HOME PAGE9/11 TRUTH BOOKGod Bless The America BOOKHIDDEN JEWISH TYRANNYCOMMUNISM IS JUDAISMWHO CONTROLS THE USAWHITE GENOCIDEWHITE HOUSE CONTROLRABBI DOV ZAKHEIM 9/11The Pentagon InfestationWTC BUILDING 7Dr. Jones and Thermate9/11 OMISSION COMMISSION9/11 TRUTH LINKSBOLLYN 911 TruthA & E For 9/11 TruthTHE ODED YINON PLANRECOMMENDED READING9/11 Traitors & SuspectsFALSE FLAG OPERATIONSUSS LIBERTY TRUTH-FACTSCommunism By The BackdoorDROP THE JEW TABOOHollywood TV ControlISRAEL SPIES ON USAA JEW EXPOSES ISRAELMotherload of Jewish ListsREAL HISTORY CHANNELBernays PropagandaJew-Zionist OrganizationsHistory of Zionist CrimesThe Frankfurt SchoolJEWISH POWER BASESThe Protocols of ZionZionist Master PlanANTI ZIONIST LEAGUEBANKSTERSNWO OBSERVERHOUSE OF ROTHSCHILDBaron Edmond de RothschildTHE BALFOUR DECLARATIONFEDERAL RESERVE BANKI.R.S. The Real FactsTrojan Horse TRUMPSONGBIRD John McCAINHENRY KISSINGERL.B.J. Blackmailed & BribedNIXON'S JEWISH PROBLEMIsrael's Samson OptionSilent Weapons Quiet WarsTHE HOLOCAUST LIESHaavara Transfer AgreementHolocaust Lie SitesCODOH (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust)AUSCHWITZThe ANNE FRANK FRAUDRemember Ernst ZundelMeet Germar RudolfMeet Ursula HaverbeckTHE HOLODOMOR TRUTHWHY GERMANS WERE ANGRYJUSTICE FOR GERMANYGreatest Story Never ToldJUSTICE FOR GERMANSTHE BAD WARHELLSTORMEisenhower Death CampsTHE DRESDEN HOLOCAUSTSolzhenitsyn Russo-Jewish HistoryPATTON'S MURDERMASONIC VICTORIESKILLING KENNEDYSJewish Gun ControlWho Said What About JewsOrwell and HuxleyLindbergh & DisneyHENRY FORD VS. THE JEWSROBERT E. EDMONDSONELZABETH DILLINGChurchill anti-Semitic?WAR IS A RACKETRemember Rachel CorrieJimmy Carter on PalestineIF AMERICANS KNEWJames Traficant KNEW (RIP)Israel's Third World WarsThe Porn StarsCircumcision PhallusyChristian ZionismMORE HIDDEN HISTORYADL - ACLU - SPLCHISTORICAL TRIBUNEJEWS & THE NAACPThe Monsanto MonsterInstitute for Historical ReviewINCONVENIENT HISTORYJohn KaminskiKen O'Keefe Speaks OutSMOLOKO.COMRENEGADE BROADCASTINGRENEGADE TRIBUNELASHA DARKMOONDr. David DukeBrother NathanaelSTORMFRONTJEW WATCHJEW WORLD ORDERTHE WHITE RESISTERTHIS IS EUROPASTOP THE CRIME SITEThe Anti-New York TimesA Letter To AmericansLINKS DeLUXMEME COLLECTIONTOWARD THE UNKNOWN

American Protestant Christianity as the enabler for Judaic world domination and quite possibly for the end of the world...

  • Image result for mega church


    By Staś

    Dispensationalist evangelical Christians in America are the greatest friends Israel has in the world, and have been for a long time. In their very strange and science-fictionesque visualization of the soon-to-take-place ‘end of the world’ and the destruction of everything in it, they believe Israel plays a central role in ‘God’s plan’ viz the last chapter of human history and in what they call the ‘end-times’. And although the various individuals and groups making up this strange cult differ on a few particulars, one thing upon which they are all in agreement is that Jesus is scheduled to make a grand entrance at the end of it all and with all of them holding front row seats.



    Although there are many different ‘species’ of Protestant evangelical Christianity in America, the one thing that universally connects virtually all various groups is what can only be termed an obsession with the ‘end times’. As if nothing else in the 2,000 years of Christian history existed except one obscure chapter in the very last book of the bible–Revelations–the consummation of the world seems to dominate all discussion and activity. Mega-churches hosting thousands and even football stadiums hosting tens of thousands and rented for special ‘end times’ events get nationwide TV coverage and with millions of eyes and ears glued to what is going on.


  • It is easy to understand then why a phenomenon such as this would be the target for manipulation on the political level. The fact that this particular group represents the single largest voting block in America with upwards of 90 million people, the notion that it would somehow escape being captured and manipulated by interested parties with a particular political agenda is not as much an unlikelihood as it is an impossibility. The truth is that American Protestant Evangelical Christianity has been immensely important as a fuel for vital political projects, including the creation of Israel in 1948 and every drop of political and monetary support that the Jewish state has vampired from both America and around the world since that time.

    Image result for charles larkin dispensational truth chart the last days

    The very erudite and eloquent  Patrick J. Buchanan maintains (correctly) that WWI and WWII were not two separate wars but one giant European civil war that resulted in the destruction of Europe. The British who turned Palestine over to the Jews in 1948 needed the support of the Americans during WWI. That was “the deal”.



  • This is an important fact to keep in mind, given that it was Great Britain who performed the necessary CPR in breathing ‘new life’ into the Frankenstein monster known as Judea, but it would then fall upon America and its millions of Apocalypse-addicted Evangelical Christians who would be tasked with feeding, coddling and protecting this new political creation known as JSIL–the Jewish state in the Levant.



  • And while some evangelicals condemned the activities of those Jewish terrorist groups made infamous for some of their bloody exploits, including major terrorist acts such as the bombing of the King David Hotel, at the same time however many cared only about the fact that the Jews must return to the holy land as part of the ‘divine script’.



  • Although of course the Zionist Jews have been the prime movers behind these events, mainline Protestants, WASP Freemasons (Gentiles dedicated to the rebuilding of the Temple destroyed by Titus in 70 AD) and of course radical evangelicals have been major players in this. They want to see the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem blown to pieces like the aforementioned King David Hotel and the ‘3rd Temple’ rebuilt in its place. In the same manner as fans of Tolkien flocked to the movie theaters to see their favorite literary characters come to life on the big screen in living color, likewise evangelical Christians today want to see the consummation of the world in real time as it has been dramatically described by mega-church pastors such as John Hagee and others.



  • All three Abrahamic religions speak of an end times scenario. Many long for it and many even want to speed up the time table for the big finale. Understanding very well this MO on the part of American evangelical Christians, current Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu has been very adept at tapping into that particular vein and in drawing forth the necessary blood needed for the preservation of Israel in both monetary and political ways.


  • The popularity of the evangelical movement goes up and down in the US. In the aftermath of the infamous Scopes Trial it went down, whereas after the world witnessed the apocalyptic power of the newly developed atomic bomb during WWII, it went up.



  • Pastors signaling specific dates for the end of the world and/or the ‘rapture’ (that fantastic event that features prominently in virtually all neighborhoods of American Protestant Dispensationalist Christianity wherein the ‘true believers’ are suddenly vacuumed body and soul into the heavens above with no warning whatsoever) have proved to be problematic and at times have sown confusion amongst self-professed followers of Jesus Christ when the grand finale did not materialize. Nevertheless, despite some of the biggest names having had their date-sensitive predictions not materialize, nevertheless their flock seems to suffer from a certain degree of amnesia and thus continue to swallow whole-hog the next date-sensitive prediction that pops up, indicating the very emotional (and not necessarily rational) element that permeates much (all) of this.

  • Related image

    Many also seem to take delight in scenarios were their detractors are punished for their unbelief, a motley crew made up of liberals, Catholics, Democrats, Muslims, and atheists who are all pre-destined to ‘pay the piper’ when all hell breaks loose while the ‘true believers’ are vacuumed up away from all the ‘tribulations’.



  • At times one gets the image of a poorly educated person forking over what little money they have to help Israel.  One can just see Jewish porn star Ron Jeremy or some Israeli arms dealer laughing themselves silly at such a prospect.



  • Nothing even in the wildest fiction comes close to the odd dance between Jews and evangelicals. Evangelicals cry ‘we must save you!’ while at the same time, Jews laugh and take their cash.



  • Christians obsessed with end times philosophy adhere to a divine script that seems to be not quite agreed upon but quite horrifying indeed, and yet interestingly, they show no fear for themselves, secure in the knowledge that the big vacuum cleaner will save them just in time.



  • Many Protestants detest the Roman Catholic Church and the Vatican and see all Popes–past, present, and future–as the Anti-Christ described in the only book they seem to read–Revelations.



  • Yet for 500 years they have come up with  few skilled academicians who have justified in detail why they split from Rome.



  • Suffice it to say the ‘Reformation’ has had a huge affect as to why world Jewry is the preeminent power on earth to this day. Prior to this fit within Christendom, it was the unifying, solid as stone political power of the Roman Church that kept Jewry at a manageable level.



  • It must be noted the end times prophecy thinking spikes when bad or foreboding things happen. For instance, after 911 many even non-religious people developed “prophecy belief.” At times you may notice the media plays it up.  Remember the world will end in 2012? The  Y2k scare as well?



  • That Jewish voters are overwhelmingly liberal and adhere to and promote every issue that evangelicals oppose, including gay marriage, abortion on demand, etc. Despite their own conservative views they love the Jews.  The Jews and in particular the liberal Jews despise the evangelicals.



  • This is why super liberal Sen. Al Franken hates Mike Pence even more then he hates Trump. Franken detest the evangelicals. Could it be that he is familiar with their theology?

    Image result for al franken and mike pence

    Franken views Pence as worse than Trump, going so far as to refer to Pence as a Zealot, a very Jewish biblical term. He has stated the Pence would be worse for liberals on domestic issues.



  • It can be assumed that Franken is lying when he states Pence would be better on international relations and war. He knows the radical evangelicals will do anything to speed up the end times. Some even willfully. Others support Israel hardliners so firmly that this is yet another path to catastrophic war.

    This is why as TUT pointed out Franken had to go he would get in the way of the plan to impeach Trump and replace him with the evangelical Pence.

    This and the  election loss of pro-Trump Judge Roy Moore in Alabama might prove to be huge factors in the bid to impeach President Trump.

    President Trump is more than capable of dealing with the 95 million plus evangelicals. For one thing they have been endlessly attacked by the media and the left they make up some of the core of the so-called ‘deplorables’.

    It is an ongoing battle and of coarse plenty of media outlets and sell-outs are trying to portray the relationship between Trump and the evangelicals as strained.

    Lets face it–a lot of Trump’s support is racial, i.e. rust belt whites.  Or as Steve Bannon  calls them “the forgotten man”

    If the media itself–which is the real power in the United States–goes after Trump often there is not much even he can do.  The media control gives the advantage.

    This is why the support of the evangelicals for Trump and Pence has been very important. Their numbers are huge and they don’t care for the mainstream media.

    The 700 Club and similar programs watched by America’s evangelicals have gotten behind Trump and who appreciate his use of the term ‘fake news’ as they have bristled for decades under the assault on their faith by the JMSM.

    The president has done well with his white support base, but not without problems as well, and especially from events such as the rally in  Charlottesville and it’s connection to white supremacist or alleged white supremacists who have not helped Trump at all.

    The Protestant church has a lot of power in the United States. It is one of the driving forces that directs the United States. Many Protestants are fanatically pro-Israel and pro-greater Israel. That is just political reality.

    If you’re Roman Catholic or Atheist or what have you might not know about the Protestant world. It is at its core very simple.  You accept Jesus Christ and you are ”saved.”

    If you make a lot of money your ‘blessed”.

    The Protestant evangelist sometimes come into conflict with Jewish liberals over Hollywood and the obvious moral degeneration of America. However, they see Jews as God’s Chosen people who will hopefully accept Jesus Christ during the end times. This is one among many reasons the US works for Israel.

    The Protestant world is by no means monolithic. There are countless denominations and many will have nothing to do with one another. Ranging from the liberal protestants who fly the flag of LGBTQ and the banner of Black Lives Matter to the grotesque conman/conwoman team Jim and Tammy Faye Baker to megachurch Pastor John Charles Hagee who constantly invokes the wrath of God to fall upon whatever creature speaks unfavorably about Israel.

    Related image

    In fact evangelicals seem to delight in the fact that according to their interpretation of the divine script anyone they don’t like will perish in hell fire.

    According to Hagee a “Christian Zionist and Scofield Bible inspired dispensationalist if you defy Israel you’re going straight to hell.

    Image result for reverend hagee preaching with bibi

    This is why Trump’s announcement viz Jerusalem being the capital of Israel was and is HUGE. He has the Israelis wedded to this issue without lifting a finger.  The Arab world is united against Israel. The evangelical support has gotten firmly behind Trump.  Yet Trump will continue to push for “peace” something no other US president has tried.

    He has put Israel on the spot and he has the full support of the evangelical Christian movement in the United States behind him.  He has made a huge problem for Israel by “giving them what they want” so to speak. The expert negotiating skills of Trump fit into biblical prophecy. Indeed Trump’s Jerusalem decision is also a victory for “Evangelical politics”. A card that Trump holds that may come in handy for him later when it comes time to mobilize an army of angry, fed-up voters numbering somewhere in the area of about 95 million.

    Many Protestants or of course good people on the street level. Lots of Pastors “minister” to people, help with drug and alcohol addiction, suicide prevention, and so forth.

    Many evangelicals or Televangelists are frauds, madmen or both.  Despite endless proven frauds and scandals the mega TV holy roller preachers retain many followers and are fabulously wealthy.

    “Benny” Hinn is an Israeli televangelist, best known for his regular “Miracle Crusades”—revival meeting or faith healing summits that are usually held in stadiums in major cities. He is among the richest and most popular of the Televangelists.  He is the quintessential fraud healer and holy-roller conman.

    If you want to get saved or healed by Hinn bring cash.

    Wikipedia sites:

    In March 1993 Inside Edition reported on Hinn’s $685,000 Orlando home and Mercedes-Benz, despite Hinn having previously claiming a “modest lifestyle”. An employee of Inside Edition also faked a healing from Cerebral palsy which was shown on Hinn’s regular broadcast.[20]

    A controversial aspect of Hinn’s ministry is his teaching on, and demonstration of, a phenomenon he dubs “The Anointing”—the power purportedly given by God and transmitted through Hinn to carry out supernatural acts. At his Miracle Crusades, he has allegedly healed attendees of blindness, deafness, cancer, AIDS,[21] and severe physical injuries. However, investigative reports by the Los Angeles Times, NBC’s Dateline, the CBC’s The Fifth Estate, and the Nine Network’s 60 Minutes have called these claims into question.

    Related image

    Hinn has also caused controversy for theological remarks and claims he has made during TV appearances. In 1999, Hinn appeared on the Trinity Broadcasting Network, claiming that God had given him a vision predicting the resurrection of thousands of dead people after watching the network—laying out a scenario of people placing their dead loved ones’ hands on TV screens tuned into the station—and suggesting that TBN would be ‘an extension of Heaven to Earth’.


  • Many still to this day hate Roman Catholics and refer to them as ‘Papists’. They hate Rome–the political empire that destroyed Judea 2,000 years ago just as Jesus Christ Himself predicted would happen for the Jews’ violence and disobedience. This is why many Protestant and Jews are eager to tell you that the Jesuit Order rules the world. Within the ‘conspiracy’ world, it is acknowledged that ‘the Zionists’ are bad, but an exception is made in that they somehow report to the ‘black pope’. The Vatican controls the world?  Many if not all cannot handle the idea that the idea of a ‘chosen people’ out of the Old Testament is the ultimate form of supremacy.


  • The Episcopalians are considered the elite of the WASP neighborhood and make up a large part of the upper ranks of Freemasonry. They gather in a ‘temple’ as do their counterparts whom they despise, the Mormons.  The seal of the State of Denver is literally the very same all-seeing eye that features in Masonic symbolism.  Many of the moneyed Protestants are themselves quasi-Jewish. They gather and worship in temples like Jews. They are all keen on rebuilding the Temple in Jerusalem, just as messianic Jews are.


  • Yet they sometimes tangle with the Jews.


  • Recall Secretary of State James Baker for Super Skull and Bones Yale WASP Bush.


  • ‘F*** the Jews; they didn’t vote for us anyway.’


  • The eastern establishment Protestants or the saved have saved dentist saved doctors and telephone books that list saved places to shop for goods and services.

    They know how to network.


  • There is nothing wrong with this however what I am pointing out is that they are more insular then one might think.  You got to be saved in order to participate in the game. The exclusivity of the WAPS or eastern installment Boston Brahmin types has diminished greatly.  Long gone are the days of the ‘No Jews allowed’ country clubs. This is due in no small part to Hollywood’s attack on WASP-Think of the countless movies where the good hearted funny Jews do battle with the mean, blond-haired WASP.


  • The Protestant work ethic is admirable. Since the installment of Lyndon B. Johnson’s ‘Great Society,’ it has diminished year after year. Some would say it is all but gone.


  • The so-called Robber Barons were WASPs. They were rich but they contributed greatly to building the  US into a major power.


  • Some even pushed back against Judaic power.


  • Henry Ford a giant among them attempted to warn American Gentiles about Jewish power. He hired Elizabeth Dilling (who would later be tried for sedition for her part in efforts to keep America out of a genocidal WWII) to write books explaining the dangers of Red Communists and Jews. He gave out copies of the Protocols of Zion with his cars.


  • He wrote ‘The International Jew’.


  • He lost in his struggle against the Jews.


  • The next big loss for the WASP–and this is key–was the failure of the America First Movement to keep America out of WWII.

    Image result for america first pre wwii logo

    Sound familiar? It is no accident that Trump and Bannon pushed the use of the phrase ‘America First’.


  • Could it be they are thinking and using the ‘America First’ slogan in part because of a desperate attempt to keep the US out of WWIII?


  • Protestant power goes up and down within the US. When it goes down they try to pick it back up in the form of a revival.


  • The Protestant church has no ‘pope’ per say but a man named Dr. Harold John Ockenga was considered by many Protestants nationwide as a kind of ‘Pope of Protestantism’.


  • Ockenga and his good friend Billy Graham revitalized the Protestant world in 1950. They made it big again.

    Image result for Dr. Harold John Ockenga

    Graham was warned by the ADL to not attempt evangelizing the Jews. A clue has to who was in the dominant position.


  • The relationship between key Evangelist players such as Graham, Ockenga  and the Jews has had at times been strained.

    Image result for Dr. Harold John Ockenga

    Recall the infamous taped phone calls between Graham and President Nixon.


  • Ockenga himself was highly critical of ‘Jewish-run Hollywood’.  In In  many fundamentalists started to complain about worldwide Jewish conspiracy to take over the world

    Hollywood propaganda would slowly eat away at WASP power but in a bizarre twist of fate the WASP evangelicals and the interest with end time prophecy say the subversive activities of the Jews fit into the ‘end times plan’.


  • Thus, much of the resistance to real Jewish power is a total wash out.


  • You may notice that a lot of the conspiracy movement is nothing more than hot air. Because a lot of it is just the anger and mistrust the Protestants have for the Roman Catholic Church.


  • A lot of their criticism is justified, but to say the Vatican controls the world including ‘Zionism’ and the Mossad is ridiculous.  The Jewish money power is so far ahead of the Church that it cannot even hide it. Wall Street and virtually all money-making sectors of life in the western world are Jewish.


  • How many of the richest men  in Forbes or other publications are Jewish?  The answer is a lot.


  • Yet people talk of ‘The Illuminati’  or ‘Vatican Satanic’ groups that rule over everyone. Yet they can’t name a single person.  Does the great great grandson of Adam Weishaupt run a Hedge Fund that one can name?


  • No. But you can point to a lot of evangelical preachers that give their complete support to the State of Israel and support the plan for a ‘Greater Israel’ encompassing the entire Middle East along with all the war necessary for realizing that endeavor.


  • And virtually no one can stomach criticisms of the Old Testament itself which is an exercise in ultra-violence and supremacy.


  • Again it cannot be stated enough that for the most  whatever the Jews do is fine with the evangelicals. For they are a key part of Biblical Prophecy. They needed to return home to Israel so that the world might end and Jesus return.

    They are some well-meaning Christians who have seen though the War mongering of Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio.


  • This is a sign of great hope.


  • As witches in America publicaly curse President Trump the evangelicals pray for him. That is a positive thing. So there is hope.


  • Ockenga worked hard to oppose a JFK presidency. JFK who wanted better relations with Egypt and did not want Israel to obtain nukes.


  • Still as Alison Weir writes in ‘Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel’, some well-meaning Christians  complained bitterly about the immorality associated with the theft of Palestinian land in creating the Jewish state as well is the great danger it would pose for world peace.


  • I would contend that many more evangelicals including US presidents were and are completely committed to the formation of the state of Israel and now the expansion of settlements and to a ‘Greater Israel’ and this is no Illuminati secret. This is out in the open.


  • The WASP establishment has lost a lot of power.  America was once much run by the Protestants. When we read underground blogs like this we talk about power. We talk about things the media would never talk about.


  • Jewish power.


  • When no one is listing sometimes people will whisper to you ‘You know the Jews run America don’t you?’


  • Still many gentiles do not even realize this to be the case.


  • This is in part because of the mindset of what might be called the 2nd most powerful group in America–the liberal Protestants and the evangelical movement.


  • A brief explanation of the ‘Protestant American Imperium’ will help shed some light as to some of the reasons why the good people of America and Great Britain so willfully and diligently supported and continue to support the formation of a Jewish State in 1948.


  • That is right we are also not even supposed to talk about what I will call ‘the second power’.


  • You can make fun of Christ and Christianity all the time and this is encouraged.  But if talk about how the Christian Zionist/dispensationalist/radical evangelical fundamentalist and to some extent even the liberal Protestants assist to make the Jews and the State of Israel the most powerful group in the world today, this idea cannot be discussed openly.


  • If you talk about the Jesuit Order or the Order of illuminati people might laugh at you but you’ll be ok. (This in itself is proof of who runs things.)


  • Like Jewish power, evangelical power ebbs and flows.


  • The Protestants are by no means monolithic in their worldview.


  • Conspiracy people will point out many US Presidents are Freemasons. Well many of them are evangelical Christians. Who I might have been very keen on the Jews returning to their homeland.


  • In fact, the American Evangelicals played a key role in helping the Jews return to the Holy land.


  • At the same time, they view America as a kind of ‘new Jerusalem’, that has been blessed by the God of Israel to be the city ‘shining’ on the  hill.


  • The radical evangelical fundamentals are driven and their will is impressive. Based on their interpretation of the bible, they crave the end of the world for it will bring the return of Christ and ‘salvation’.


  • The battle to win the hearts and minds of America’s 95 million + minds continues. So far Trump seems to holding his own. No question the Zionists would prefer Mike Pence over Trump.


  • Trump’s wealth and success and his fantastically beautiful wife would actually be considered part of the ‘being blessed’ circumstance that makes up the evangelical mindset and an indicator that Trump is “god’s arm’.


  • They were skeptical of him during the election but he won enough of them over.


  • However Trump’s recent “Jerusalem gambit’ which has rallied the evangelicals behind him is risky and cuts both ways. Recently the evangelical  Pence has delayed ‘indefinitely’ his planned trip to the holy land, a sign that Trump’s ‘chaos’ plan is working.  But it cuts both ways.  Trump’s Army of evangelicals could turn on him if something goes wrong.


  • But for now they are with him.


  • The scary part is they have Pence waiting as VP to take control. All should assume he is not faking and is the real deal.


  • Pence has toured eastern Europe and wants NATO to cause trouble for Russia. He is always there to assure supporters for Israel.


  • Pence has of course expressed all out support for the ‘Iran protests’, saying ‘as long as Donald Trump is POTUS and I am VP, the United States of America will not repeat the shameful mistake of our past when others stood by and ignored the heroic resistance of the Iranian people as they fought against their brutal regime…The bold and growing resistance of the Iranian people today gives hope and faith to all who struggle for freedom and against tyranny. We must not and we will not let them down.’

    Image result for pence with hagee

    Also on On Sunday, the Likud Central Committee voted unanimously for a resolution that calls upon Israel to impose sovereignty over illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.

    Things are heating up and Trump might find himself boxed in and out of  tricks. VP Pence is on his back ready to do the bidding of Israel.  It may be hard for the fast talking Trump

    Trump has today 1/2/2018 suggested the US should halt aid to the Palestinian Authority, accusing the Palestinians of being ‘no longer willing to talk peace’ with Israel.

    Pence and his Army of evangelicals are ready.  Ready to go to war to bring about the end times?  Very possible.


  • I would say to any Jew or Protestant.  Do whatever you can to contest this  push for end times/fanatical support for Israel, because chances are very good that it just might happen. In other words do what you can to stop the end of the world, which includes YOUR world.


  • Sutton, Matthew Avery. American Apocalypse: A History of Modern Evangelicalism . Harvard University Press.


  • Timothy P. Weber. On the Road to Armageddon: How Evangelicals Became Israel’s Best Friend

 

 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

HOW CHRISTIANITY WAS INVENTED: THE TRUTH!

 

 

Emperor Constantine

Christianity is a copycat religion created by Emperor Constantine (for political purposes). (Incidentally, Constantine murdered his wife and his son, and later,  the Church made him a Saint.)

(For greater shocking revelations, see “Crimes of the Popes”, here) : http://www.ftarchives.net/foote/crimes/c7.htm )

Saint Constantine’s  copycat religion was based upon a myth (The Persian savior god Mithra, crucified 600 B.C. ?  400 B.C.?), which was based on other similar myths, all the way back to Chrishna of India (a mythical god that some claim was “crucified” around 1200 B.C.). There were 16 mythical crucifixions before Christ. The belief in the crucifixion of Gods was prevalent in various oriental or heathen countries long prior to the reported crucifixion of Christ.  Of the 16 crucifixions, most were born of a virgin and about half of them on December 25th.

At Amazon.com, take a look at the book “Beyond All Religion-Beyond religious SCRIPTURES and practices that support intolerance violence and even war, A PEACEFUL WORLD AWAITS”. Website: http://www.beyondallreligion.net/ Included: How is this for religious intolerance? Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” Muhammad married a 6 year old girl. Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism had 24 wives, one was 14 years old. Smith was convicted of fraud (of being an “imposter”- a con man), in a court of law.. Then he wrote “The Book of Mormon..”. The story of Moses is patterned after the story of Sargon the Great. Moses did not exist.   Christianity was invented for political purposes by the Roman  Emperor Constantine (“The Great”) in 325 A.D. based on the myth of Mithra (Persian savior god born on December 25th). Look at “Compassion Center” on Facebook. A wonderful alternative to religion.

Emperor Constantine-continued: There were too many religions in Rome in 325 A.D.  A Council was called in an endeavor to amalgamate the many religions of the Roman Empire into one.  Christianity plagiarized older myths and legends historicized to suit the Roman Catholic Church while combining the numerous religions existing at the time (Krishna, Horus, Mithraism, Osirian, Isis, and many other mystery religions).  For unity and to stop all the conflicts between the numerous religions…

Christianity was INVENTED. Eusebius (Bishop of Caesarea in Palestine  “Father of Church History“) attended the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. and was a friend of Emperor Constantine, who also attended and made the keynote speech. Constantine  instructed Eusebius to organize the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at the council.  Eusebius has been described as  follows:  Jacob Burckhardt (19th century cultural historian) dismissed Eusebius as “the first thoroughly dishonest historian of antiquity”. He has been also described as “a political theologian”. He favored doctoring his history in his own words to “be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity”. Edward Gibbon (18th century historian –“The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire”) dismissed his testimony on the number of martyrs and impugned his honesty At first, there was controversy about the new religion at the Council of Nicaea.  Some claimed it was a fiction and Christ was a fiction, but they did not prevail. .

(To be clear on this matter, I say don’t trust Eusebius’s  reports of the Apostles or how the Apostles died, and be suspicious of all of his writings.)  – Author Samuel Butler

Eusebius then arranged for scribes to produce fifty sumptuous copies to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art (ibid.).

Bishop Eusebius

These orders, said Eusebius, were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself we sent him [Constantine] magnificently and elaborately bound volumes of three-fold and four-fold forms (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, p.36).  They were  the New Testimonies, and this is the first mention (c. 331) of the New Testament in the historical record. With his instructions fulfilled,  Constantine then decreed that the New Testimonies would thereafter be called the word of the Roman Saviour God (Life of Constantine, vol. iii, p. 29) and official to all presbyters sermonising in the Roman Empire.

He then ordered earlier presbyterial manuscripts and the records of the council burnt and declared that any man found concealing writings should be stricken off from his shoulders (beheaded).

NONE OF THESE 50 NEW TESTAMENTS EXIST TODAY OR ARE ADMITTED TO EXISTING!

THIS NEW TESTAMENT WAS THE OFFICIAL BOOK OF THE NEW UNIFIED RELIGION OF CONSTANTINE NOT THE BIBLE!

ALL OTHER BOOKS TO BE BURNED ,THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE TORAH/OLD TESTAMENT

IT INCLUDED BURNING THE GREAT LIBRARY OF ALEXANDRIA IN EGYPT 391 A.D.

In 391 A.D., Christian Emperor Theodosius I ordered the destruction of all pagan (“heathen” they were also called) temples. The Christian Patriarch Theophilus of Alexandria (Egypt) complied with this request. Seizing this opportunity, Theophilus exerted himself to the utmost to expose the pagan mysteries to contempt, the Serapeum also he showed full of extravagant superstitions, (and) the commander-in-chief of the troops in Egypt, assisted Theophilus in demolishing the heathen temples (and) then he destroyed the Serapeum. -Historia Ecclesiastica

The Serapeum housed the Great Library of Alexandria.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_alexandria Why there are no records of Jesus Christ?

Federic William Farrar

It is not possible to find in any legitimate religious or historical writings compiled between the beginning of the first century and well into the fourth century any reference to Jesus Christ and the spectacular events that the Church says accompanied his life. This confirmation comes from Frederic Farrar (1831-1903) of Trinity College, Cambridge:

“It is amazing that history has not embalmed for us even one certain or definite saying or circumstance in the life of the Saviour of mankind … there is no statement in all history that says anyone saw Jesus or talked with him. Nothing in history is more astonishing than the silence of contemporary writers about events relayed in the four Gospels.”  (The Life of Christ, Frederic W. Farrar, Cassell, London, 1874)

This situation arises from a conflict between history and New Testament narratives.  Dr Tischendorf made this comment:

“We must frankly admit that we have no source of information with respect to the life of Jesus Christ other than ecclesiastic writings assembled during the fourth century.” (Codex Sinaiticus, Dr Constantin von Tischendorf, British Library, London)

There is an explanation for those hundreds of years of silence: the construct of Christianity did not begin until after the first quarter of the fourth century, and that is why Pope Leo X (d. 1521) called Christ a “fable” (Cardinal Bembo:  His Letters…, op. cit.), and later Pope Paul III expressed similar sentiments, saying that there was no valid document to demonstrate the existence of Christ.  He confessed that Jesus never existed, adding that he was no other than the sun, adored in its Mithraic sect…”

BUT WAIT, WHAT DOES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SAY ABOUT THIS?

You will be surprised:  From: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biblianazar/esp_biblianazar_40.htm :

What (your local) Church doesn’t know and/or wouldn’t want you to know,  if they knew.

It has often been emphasized that Christianity is unlike any other religion, for it stands or falls by certain events which are alleged to have occurred during a short period of time some 20 centuries ago. Those stories are presented in the New Testament, and as new evidence is revealed it will become clear that they do not represent historical realities.

The Church agrees, saying:

“Our documentary sources of knowledge about the origins of Christianity and its earliest development are chiefly the New Testament Scriptures, the authenticity of which we must, to a great extent, take for granted.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, p. 712)

The Church makes extraordinary admissions about its New Testament. For example, when discussing the origin of those writings, “the most distinguished body of academic opinion ever assembled” (Catholic Encyclopedias, Preface) admits that the Gospels “do not go back to the first century of the Christian era” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. vi, p. 137, pp. 655-6).

This statement conflicts with priesthood assertions that the earliest Gospels were progressively written during the decades following the death of the Gospel (sic) Jesus Christ. In a remarkable aside, the Church further admits that, “the earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”– (Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7).

That is some 350 years after the time the Church claims that a Jesus Christ walked the sands of Palestine, and here the true story of Christian origins slips into one of the biggest black holes in history. There is, however, a reason why there were no New Testaments until the fourth century: they were not written until then, and here we find evidence of the greatest misrepresentation of all time.  It was British-born Flavius Constantinus (Constantine, originally Custennyn or Custennin) (272-337) who authorized the compilation of the writings now called the New Testament.

Yes, but what about references to the four Gospels supposedly before the 3rd Century A.D.?

For example: What about Tacitus, Roman Historian, who wrote about the persecutions of the early “Christians”?

Regarding Tacitus, (Senator and Historian of the Roman Empire) these writings supporting the persecution were mysteriously found in the 15th century in the forests of Germany, following a reward offered by Leo X for old writings, and following a history of forgeries in Catholicism:  In any case, there has been serious questions about the integrity of the famous passage about Christians.

From: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/tacitus.html Gordon Stein denied the authenticity of this passage, arguing: (1) no corroborating evidence that Nero persecuted the Christians (2) there was not a multitude of Christians in Rome at that date (3) Christian was not a common term in the first century (4) Nero was indifferent to various religions in his city (5) Nero did not start the fire in Rome (6) Tacitus does not use the name Jesus (7) Tacitus assumes his readers know Pontius Pilate Yes, but what about Josephus?

His reference to Jesus in Testimonium Flavianum has been claimed as a later addition, (Forgery-Author) not questioning the authenticity of the main work.

See: http://www.truthbeknown.com/josephus.htm

Also: https://www.academia.edu/10463098/Josephus_s_Testimonium_Flavianum_Examined_Linguistically_Greek_Analysis_Demonstrates_the_Passage_a_Forgery_In_Toto

In part:

Josephus’s Testimonium Flavianum Examined Linguistically Greek Analysis Demonstrates the Passage a Forgery In Toto

From D.M. Murdock 
 Author of
Who Was Jesus?
 D.M.Murdock[at]StellarHousePublishing.com (With gratitude to Dr. Paul J. Hopper for his review of this paper)
 Abstract
The passage about Jesus Christ in Jewish historian Josephus’s writings
 has been debated for centuries, as concerns its authenticity totally, partially or not at all 
. This brief “testimonium” is proffered by Christian apologists as the “best evidence” for the historicity of Jesus, but it has been declared many times to be a forgery in toto. A recent study by a renowned linguist confirms this analysis of the entire passage as an interpolation by a Christian scribe, likely during the fourth century or late

Yes, but what about Pliny the Younger’s letter to Emperor Trajan 112 A.D.(Pliny was not a contemporary of Jesus, and he never mentions “Jesus”?) Pliny the Younger (c. 61 – c. 112), the provincial governor of Pontus and Bithynia, wrote to Emperor Trajan c. 112 concerning how to deal with Christians, who refused to worship the emperor, and instead worshiped “Christus”.

What about that?

Charles Guignebert

Charles Guignebert, who does not doubt that Jesus of the Gospels lived in Gallilee in the 1st century, nevertheless dismisses this letter as acceptable historical evidence:

“Only the most robust credulity could  reckon this assertion as admissible evidence for the historicity of Jesus” – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

Nevertheless, I was concerned about the possibility of far older Gospels when I was stating that Christianity was invented around 325 A.D., but the research thread leads back to Eusebius, the FORGER, (“Papias, quoted by Eusebius…”).

Eusebius was the dishonest Church Father historian of antiquity who made up a lot of Church historywe shall introduce into this history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity”. The research thread (about older Gospels) also leads to the “spurious” writings of Irenaeus: http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/gospels-late-forgeries/blog-249881/ .

THE RELIGIOUS QUICKSAND OF EARLY CHRISTIAN WRITINGS.

A  SCHOLAR AND YOU WILL BE QUICKLY SWALLOWED UP IN QUICKSAND RESEARCHING SO-CALLED “PRE-NICENE” WRITINGS.

What about  pre-nicene so-called “Early Christian” (Gnostic?) writings? They disagreed with each other, were riddled with conflict and forgeries, of questionable and confusing timing and origin , had conflicting opinions about supposed truths,  and were not coherent enough for an organized religion. So the myth of Mithra, the Persian Savior God, was chosen by Emperor Constantine and Bishop Eusebius as the model to create the new religion , Christianity.  What if there are references to Christ and/or Jesus in pre-nicene writings? That doesn’t mean Jesus or Christ existed.  What if there are references to “fairies” in pre-nicene literature?  That wouldn’t mean fairies existed,  prior to the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD or later, even if the Council claimed the existence of fairies and made it doctrine, with severe penalties for those who denied their existence.

Yes, but what about Church father Justin Martyr’s purported use of the New Testament gospels? From Acharya S., Biblical scholar: (http://www.freethoughtnation.com/contributing-writers/63-acharya-s/679-does-justin-martyr-quote-the-gospels.html) “No verbatim quotes or unambiguous citations from the canonical gospels as we have them appear anywhere in Justin’s extant works.” Matthew, Mark and Luke are never named by Justin; nor is John. Nor does Justin Martyr name any of the evangelists in any known text.

All of the Gospels were written by anonymous authors, not by the actual disciples .  In fact, the Church doesn’t even have the anonymous writings that purport to be written by a disciple that was written before the middle of the 4th century. “The earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”– (Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7).

That is saying, they have no manuscript of Mark,. no manuscript of Matthew nor Luke, nor John, written before the middle of the  4th century.

Retired Episcopal Bishop says Hell is an invention of the church to control people with fear:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=5BkP9-HG8-Ihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Shelby_Spong

Information about Eusebius, Constantine, and Paul. FATHER EUSEBIUS, FORGER:http://www.christianity-revealed.com/cr/files/fathereusebiustheforger.html (One view, for what it’s worth-a bit harsh) _______________________________________

The False Prophet John Hagee

This False Prophet's name is John Hagee. An evangelical Zionist that is on record stating the Jewish people don't need Christ

Christian Zionism BRAINWASHING

John Rand https://www.facebook.com/groups/John.Rand.Group/permalink/207710599356617/SEE ALSO ...

How Americans Were Manipulated into Loving Israel

 

 The vast majority of Christians that I’ve met are Zionists. They not only espouse a Jewish right to a homeland in Israel, but they refer to Jews as “God’s Chosen People” and believe it is their duty as good Christians to defend Israel no matter what.

 

When I ask Christians whether Zionism is a valid position to hold, I am not asking whether they believe in the Jewish right to their own homeland. I believe that every group of people should have their own homeland, if they should desire one. Instead, I am talking about the reflexive posture of submission and servility shown by Christian Zionists towards the state of Israel in the belief that doing so will bring blessings from God.

 

Americans love Israel. While it is not unusual to find people of Irish or Polish descent who love Ireland or Poland, there are millions of Americans who love Israel even though they have no connection to the small, Middle Eastern country. Why is this the case?

 

Israel is a country with a clear purpose

 

There are things to admire about Israel. The most important is its clarity of purpose. The primary goal of Israel is to protect the country and its citizens. Israelis take attacks against their people personally. In 2015, when a terrorist stabbed two people in Jerusalem, civilians and even a police officer beat and kicked the terrorist who had already been shot. But Americans and Europeans have been conditioned to think as atomized units, not as a single people. Terrorism, which is an act of war against a nation, is treated merely has a crime.

 

Israel’s ability to put its own interests first has enabled it to undertake efficient action in defending itself. In 2010, Mossad assassinated a Hamas official in a Dubai hotel. The assassination, which involved nine agents, is like something out of a James Bond movie. When Israeli citizens were hijacked in Entebbe Airport in Uganda, the Israeli Defense Forces undertook a daring overnight raid. And while weak Western leaders hold hands and mouth platitudes after each terrorist attack, Israeli leaders like Benjamin Netanyahu are strong, confident, and unabashedly pro-Israel. For many Americans, cheering for Israel is like supporting a winning team, while their own country’s actions give them little reason to get excited.

                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                          Disordered love

 

The feeling that millions of Americans have about Israel is much deeper than mere admiration. It is better described as idolization. There are several reasons this idolization exists.

First, Israel has a powerful political lobby, AIPAC. American Jews are generally very successful and they use their money to support their politics, and this includes Israel. American politicians from both sides of the aisle, anxious to get donations, make the most boot-licking speeches at the annual AIPAC conference. Thus, it doesn’t really matter whether you elect a Republican or a Democrat. You can rest assured that they will be ardently pro-Israel.

 

SEE MORE: WAR CRIMES: Israeli Planes Spray Crop-Killing Chemicals on Gaza Farms 

 

                                                                                                                    Dispensationalism

 

The biggest reason why so Americans love Israel, even more than their own country, is not due to the work of AIPAC. Rather, it is the result of a peculiar Christian heresy—the heresy of Dispensationalism.

 

Dispensationalism originated with John Nelson Darby, an English Christian preacher who lived in the 1800s. It only received wide popularity, though, through the influence of the Scofield Bible. The Scofield Bible contains Dispensationalist commentary by Cyrus I. Scofield (1843-1921).

 

There are allegations that Scofield was influenced by Jewish Zionists. Though Scofield was a fundamentalist preacher, he was admitted as a member of the Lotus Club, an elite NYC men’s club. One of the club’s committee members was Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. Author David Lutz suggests that it may have been Untermeyer who encouraged Scofield to write his commentary:

 

Untermeyer used Scofield… to inject Zionist ideas into American Protestantism. Untermeyer and other wealthy and influential Zionists whom he introduced to Scofield promoted and funded the latter’s career, including travel in Europe.

 

What’s wrong with Dispensationalism

 

To understand why Dispensationalism is so perverted, it’s necessary to explain what Christians believed before Dispensationalism came on the scene. Traditional Christian theology teaches that the Christian covenant is the “new and eternal covenant” that fulfills all the past covenants including God’s covenant with Israel.

 

John Charles Hagee

 

In Second Corinthians, St. Paul says that the old covenant has “faded away.” The Epistle to the Romans says that Christ is “the end of the law” meaning he was both the goal and the termination of the old covenant. Traditional theology also teaches that the Christian Church is the true continuation of Israel: Jesus is Israel’s true Messiah and the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. Therefore, the Church, which includes gentiles and Christians Jews, is “the Israel of God” (Gal. 6:16), not Jews by physical descent. Let me say it again for emphasis: the traditional Christian belief is that the Church is the true continuation of Israel.

 

SEE MORE: Jewish Survivors of Holocaust & Their Descendants Condemn Israel’s Massacre of Palestinians

 

Thus, for 1800 years, Christians did not believe the re-establishment of a Jewish state or modern day Israel. They played no role in the biblical prophecy. Dispensationalism changed that. Dispensationalists believe that the Christian Church is God’s “Plan B.” With the Church, God is merely taking a temporary break before getting to what He really cares about—Israel according to the flesh. This can be seen in the picture at the head of this section which portrays three horses—two large Jewish ones (don’t ask me why there are two) and one small Christian one. The Church that Christ died for is an afterthought.

 

Dispensationalism is largely a Protestant phenomenon. Most Baptist and non-denominational churches subscribe to it, which means that most Evangelical Christians are also dispensationalists. While the Catholic Church does not teach dispensationalism, some Catholics have also succumbed. I had one Catholic on Twitter block me after I told him that the modern state of Israel plays no special role in Christian theology.

 

Dispensationalism in action

 

Dispensationalism has practical impacts on how its adherents behave in the real world. Dispensationalist Christians have applied the following verse to Israel and Jews in general: “I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you” (Gen 12:3). In context, the verse refers to Abraham the patriarch, but Dispensationalist Christians take it to mean that whoever supports Jews and Israel, will be personally blessed.

John Charles Hagee is the founder and senior pastor of Cornerstone Church, a megachurch in San Antonio, Texas. Hagee is also the CEO of his non-profit corporation, Global Evangelism Television

 

This type of thinking is extremely powerful form of conditioning. Everyone wants to be personally blessed by God and here is a passage that Evangelicals believe guarantee them blessings. More realistically, it guarantees Israel a large block of voters who will consistently and unquestioningly support pro-Israel policies. No other countries, including staunch US allies France and Great Britain, have such a solid base of support.

 

Evangelical Christians are a potent force in American politics so US politicians go out of their way to appeal to this fervor. During one of the GOP debates in 2015, each of the 16 candidates mentioned the security of Israel in their closing statement. This blatant pandering caused Ann Coulter to tweet: “How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?” But the candidates were not just targeting wealthy Jewish donors, but all those Evangelical voters who have been programmed to support Israel.

 

This disordered love of Israel is not harmless. It has helped lead the United States into dubious wars in the Middle East in support of Israel. It has also spurred the development of Islamic fundamentalism and Islamic terrorism. ISIS came about due to US support of “moderate rebels” to depose Syrian president Assad, an enemy of Israel. And blind support of Israel may eventually lead us into a war with Iran—a country that poses no military threat to the US.

 

SEE MORE: Balkanizing the Middle East: The REAL Goal of America and Israel: Shatter Syria and Iraq Into “Many Small Pieces” 

 

The ethical defense of other people

 

Now that we have examined the “Old vs. New Covenant” dilemma, let us move on to examining whether it’s truly ethical to defend any particular group of people–no matter what they do.

 

I think it’s a fairly dangerous position to take, and one that leads to very negative logical conclusions. After all, if one has made up one’s mind to defend a person or group of people no matter what they do, then is there any point at which one would hold said person or people accountable?

 

Is there any crime so vicious, any act so heinous, that your sense of decency (or self-preservation) would kick in and you would want to defend yourself from them, instead of defending those actions?

 

Or, if the Israeli politicians are “God’s Chosen People” who can do no wrong, do you simply turn a blind eye to anything bad they do out of fear of offending God?

 

This is a very serious matter, as the Old Testament does say that those who curse the Israelites will be cursed in turn. It puts the thinking man in a difficult position, if he believes in the Old Testament and ignores Paul’s thoughts on the topic.

 

Of course, the problem is easily solved if it is true that the “Jewish” people currently running Israel have no blood relation to the ancient Biblical Israelites. If that’s the case, then not only are Christians under no obligation whatsoever to mindlessly defend them, but we can also safely hold them accountable for their actions without fear of divine retaliation.


 

Click on this text to get an idea of what Jews really think of Christ and Christians...

.

.

 

Click on this text to view the folly of Christian Zionism....


Nearly 70 million Christians in the United States accept or are heavily influenced by the belief system of Christian Zionism. The primary requirement of Christian Zionism is the belief that the modern state of Israel is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. So 20% of the population of America thinks we MUST conduct WAR FOR Israel! Only 2% of the population is Jewish. So you can see what we are up against! This is the biggest pro-war voting block in America. They do seem to be getting their way!

Christian Zionism, also referred to as Premillennialism, Judeo-Christianity and Dispensationalism was considered heresy for the first 1800 years of the church until it reappeared in 1830. With the publishing of the Scofield Reference Bible in 1908, Christian Zionism found a mainstream audience. Why would millions of Christians worldwide forsake fundamental Christian values in favor of war, persecution and fear, yet continue to call this behavior Christian?

History is replete with instances of people using religion for political and monetary gain. Jesus Christ warns of this in the New Testament. Christianity today is being used as an excuse for theft, murder, destruction and deception. The majority of Christians supporting this have no idea what they’re supporting or why they believe this.

This video proves the deception beyond question. It shows you how Christianity is being used for political purposes in direct contradiction to the teachings of Jesus Christ.
 
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Click on this text to see 'Marching to Zion' - Christian Zionism and 1948 Israel Exposed! ...

THE INCREDIBLE SCHOFIELD
 
And his perversion of Christianity for the Zionist Jews.
 
In his 2008 book, The Rise of Israel: A History of a Revolutionary State, Jonathan R. Adelman describes the crucial support Israel receives from Christian fundamentalists as “totally fortuitous.” That assertion is belied, however, by the incredible career of the man who wrote “the Bible of Fundamentalism.”
 
Two years after Scofield’s reported conversion to Christianity in 1879, the Atchison Patriot was less than impressed. Describing the former Atchison resident as the “late lawyer, politician and shyster generally,” the article went on to recount a few of Scofield’s “many malicious acts.” These included a series of forgeries in St. Louis, for which he was sentenced to six months in jail.
 
Being a “born again” preacher did not preclude Scofield from becoming a member of an exclusive New York men’s club in 1901, either. In his devastating biography, The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph M. Canfield suggests, “The admission of Scofield to the Lotus Club, which could not have been sought by Scofield, strengthens the suspicion that has cropped up before, that someone was directing the career of C.I. Scofield.”
 
That someone, Canfield suspects, was associated with one of the club’s committee members, the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. As Canfield intimates, Scofield’s theology was “most helpful in getting Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer’s pet projects—the Zionist Movement.”
 
Others have been even more explicit about the nature of Scofield’s service to the Zionist agenda. In “Unjust War Theory: Christian Zionism and the Road to Jerusalem,” Prof. David W. Lutz writes, “Untermeyer used Scofield, a Kansas City lawyer with no formal training in theology, to inject Zionist ideas into American Protestantism. Untermeyer and other wealthy and influential Zionists whom he introduced to Scofield promoted and funded the latter’s career, including travel in Europe.”
 
On one of these European trips, Oxford University Press publisher Henry Frowde “expressed immediate interest” in Scofield’s project. According to a biography of Frowde, although the OUP publisher was “[n]ot demonstrative in his religious views, all his Christian life he was associated with brethren known as ‘Exclusive.’” The “Exclusive Brethren” refers to the group of Christian evangelicals that, in an 1848 split in the Plymouth Brethren, followed John Nelson Darby, the Anglo-Irish missionary generally considered to have been the most influential figure in the development of Christian Zionism, and a major influence on Scofield.
 

Scofield’s Legacy
 
Had the Scofield Bible never been published, American presidents influenced by Christian Zionism such as Truman, Johnson, Reagan and George W. Bush might have been less sympathetic to Israeli demands, and consequently more attentive to U.S. interests. Moreover, the American people could have been spared the pseudo-Christian rants of John Hagee, Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell, not to mention the lucrative End Times Rapture “prophecy” peddled by Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye.
 
But it is the people of the Middle East who have been most affected by an expansionist Israel emboldened by the unswerving allegiance of Christian Zionists led to believe that Scofield’s words are God’s will. Not least among the many victims of the Scofield Bible are 5 million Palestinian refugees whose right to return is fervently opposed by America’s Zionized Christians. Thanks to their indoctrination by Scofield’s unholy book, they believe that Palestine belongs not to the Palestinians—many of whom are fellow Christians—but exclusively to “God’s chosen people.” ❑
 
Maidhc Ó Cathail writes extensively on U.S. foreign policy and the Middle East. He is also the creator and editor of The Passionate Attachment blog, which focuses primarily on the U.S.-Israeli relationship.

.

.

Click on this text to see Christian Zionism : the biggest Deception Revealed ...

 
 

Roots of American Christian Zionism. Part I

 
 

Long before John Locke set about writing his late 17th century works which laid the foundations for political liberalism in the Anglo-Saxon world (and the broader West), there existed the already deeply entrenched religious views of Martin Luther and John Calvin. The works of these two founding fathers of Protestantism greatly influenced the spiritual, cultural, political, social and economic Weltanschauung of Americans far more than anything written by Locke or any of the other social contract philosophers of the Enlightenment (e.g. Hobbes, Rousseau, Kant, et al.). This unique American worldview, or more specifically culture-soul, which arose on the rocky shores of New England during the first half of the 17th century, can indeed be classified as “Calvinist” as it exhibits many distinctly Calvinist traits such as the Protestant Ethic, staunch individualism, an obsession with the concept of God’s Chosen People, the belief in exceptionalism, a universal world mission, etcetera. However, there is a specific ideological catalyst within Calvinism which itself provided the foundation for the tradition of Christian Zionism to take root – a tradition which for the past 400 years has flourished in North America and indeed is flourishing today like never before among evangelical Christians, Neoconservatives and a variety of other groups. The ideological catalyst alluded to is Judeocentric prophecy interpretation. Without this fundamental ideological catalyst firmly in place (implanted as it was in early Protestant theology), it is highly doubtful whether the subsequent doctrine of Christian Zionism would have ever arisen – a doctrine which has had an enormous influence not only on American religion and politics but on American culture and identity as well.

 

Without question, the strongest advocates of Christian Zionism in the United States today are evangelical Christians. Here it is important to understand that the evangelicals are not only a religious group, but they are a highly mobilized political bloc who enjoy an enormous amount of support nationwide (especially in the South and Midwest), and thus they wield a great amount of political power. The defining characteristic or trait of evangelical Christians is not their belief in Jesus (which would make them no different from other nominal Christian groups) but rather their unconditional support for the modern terroristic state of Israel. Indeed, it is their unabashed Zionist fanaticism which has caused many to refer to evangelicals as “Christian Zionists” – and indeed, in the author’s opinion, these two terms (“evangelical” and “Christian Zionist”) are synonymous.

 

Understanding the two intertwined facts that (1) Christian Zionists possess a great deal of power in the U.S. and (2) they are absolutely fanatical when it comes to supporting Israel also helps one to understand why a pro-Jewish lobbying organization like AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) has so much political influence in the United States.

 

But then the following questions naturally arise: Why are there all of these Zionist Christians? Where did they come from? Why is Christian Zionism so prevalent in America, etc.? To answer these questions we must study both the historical and ideological bases of Judeocentric prophecy interpretation, as well as the Judeocentric tradition of biblical hermeneutics in general. We must therefore begin our study in the most obvious place: the Protestant Reformation and Martin Luther.

 

The important thing to know about Luther with regard to Judeocentric prophecy interpretation is his absolute emphasis on biblical literalism – i.e. his insistence on the idea that when one reads and interprets the bible, it must be taken literally. Luther inaugurated this patently Protestant view which, it should be said, fundamentally differs from medieval hermeneutics. For example, medieval theologians tried to embrace as many approaches as possible when interpreting biblical texts – they were quite literally Catholic (i.e. universal) in this sense. They would interpret the bible metaphorically, allegorically, anagogically – as many ways as possible in order to extract every last drop of biblical “juice” or meaning from the text. But Luther went in a very different direction. He insisted on literalism. Thus, Luther insisted on interpreting all history through a narrow biblical lens. In other words, he insisted on looking to historical events for confirmations and clues to past and future prophecies.

 

As the unequivocal founder (or “first father”) of Protestantism, Luther had obviously made prime enemies with the Pope and the entire Catholic Church as a religious and political institution. Accordingly, Luther directed his most passionate attacks against Catholicism. Nevertheless, there was another very powerful religio-political force which Luther frequently denounced – the Ottoman Empire. And so, in his interpretation of biblical prophecy Luther considered the Antichrist as being a two-headed demonic entity, which is to say a “Turco-Catholic” Antichrist. Both Muslims and Catholics were considered to be two sides of the same satanic coin, as it were.

 

Regarding the Jews, it is well known that Luther became notoriously anti-Jewish later in life, going so far as to publish a work in 1543 entitled On the Jews and Their Lies. Nevertheless, Luther was the first theologian to advance the notion of Jewish national conversion – a belief that still persists among some Christian Zionists. Those who subscribe to the doctrine of Jewish national conversion essentially believe that preceding Christ’s return, there will be a mass conversion of Jews to Christianity, and that this conversion will actually hasten the Second Coming of Christ. It must be stressed that John Calvin also believed in the idea of Jewish national conversion, in addition to all of the other biblical-literalist ideas advanced by Luther.

 

Now then, many of the English followers of Luther and Calvin were absolutely captivated by the prospect of a Jewish national conversion – and it is precisely in England where Christian Zionism first rears its head as a popular religious force. It was on account of the pro-Jewish advocacy and intellectual influence of a number of English Christian Zionists that Oliver Cromwell was persuaded to reverse the centuries-old prohibition on Jews entering England, which had been enacted in 1290 by King Edward I. Thus, in 1657 Jews were once again permitted (and even encouraged) to settle in England.

 

The English Puritans were, needless to say, very elated to see the Jews return. They interpreted this historical event in the same way Luther or Calvin would – as a clear sign from God which would mark the imminent return of Christ. And so they immediately began trying to convert as many Jews to Protestantism as possible, only to find (to their great chagrin) that they were in fact converting no one. The Puritans soon discovered that the conversion of a single Jew was something which was extremely rare. Moreover, they soon realized that the Jews only wanted to be left alone – they wanted to remain in their own communities, maintain their own culture and traditions, to conduct business and to go about their lives. In other words, the Jews wanted to remain Jews. This fact greatly disappointed the English Puritans because, quite clearly, their apocalyptic hopes were “riding” on a different outcome (as it were) and were thus not being fulfilled in a literal way. And so, their hermeneutical interpretation changed from having a strong emphasis on literalism to favoring a more allegorical interpretation along the lines of preterism. (Preterist theology maintains that the prophecies described in the bible are not really prophecies but sets of allegories for events which have already occurred.)

 

Thus, preterist interpretations started to arise among the Puritans of England, and philology began to be used in hermeneutics by leading European philosophers like Hobbes, Grotius, Spinoza and others. It is important to stress, at this point, that on account of the relative isolation of the American colonies from the events taking place in England, the turning away from literalism in hermeneutics did not take hold in America. If anything, the intertwined ideas of biblical literalism and pro-Jewish sentiment would only grow stronger becoming a staple of American religion, thereby distinguishing it greatly from its British counterpart.

 

In his famous 1630 “City upon a Hill” speech, John Winthrop (the first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony) compared his fellow Puritan settlers to the Jews of the Old Testament. Winthrop stated that, like the Jews, the Puritans were expelled from their homes in England; like the Jews, they were persecuted; and like the Jews, they had a special covenant with God, which is to say that the Puritans believed they were given a special mission by God and that they had a special or “exceptional” role to play in history. This 1630 speech by Winthrop – which was actually just one part of his sermon, entitled “A Model of Christian Charity” – constituted the beginning of what would emerge to create not only Christian Zionism but a general kind of ethos in America, and a general idea of American exceptionalism.

 

The next major “American” figure to mention after Gov. John Winthrop is the Reverend John Cotton (1585-1652). Beginning in 1639 Cotton delivered a number of millenarian and Judeocentric speeches which also tied in the idea that the people of the New England colonies were a special people who possessed a special divinely ordained mission from God – that they were “Chosen,” just as the Old Testament Israelites had been “Chosen.” This line of thought was developed further in the work of one of Cotton’s close friends and associates (who happened also to possess a rather strange first name): the Reverend Increase Mather (1639-1723).

 

In 1669 Mather published a book entitled The Mystery of Israel’s Salvation. In this work, Mather insisted on a literalist interpretation of biblical prophecy and of the entire bible in general. A man of considerable erudition, Increase Mather was definitely aware of the anti-literalist (preterist) trends which were gaining ground in England (trends with which he strongly disagreed), and so he committed himself to defending biblical literalism against all other tendencies. Mather strongly believed that if one does not interpret the bible literally – if people allow themselves to get caught up in metaphor and allegory – then eventually the concept of religious faith will lose its entire meaning. Mather also repeated in his work many of the same themes of his Christian Zionist predecessors, going all the way back to Calvin and Luther. Themes such as: Jewish national conversion paving the way for the return of Christ, the destruction of the Catholic Church, the return of the Jews to Palestine and the concomitant destruction of Islam which would accompany the return, etc.

 

Meanwhile, back in England, there was not only a growing sense of anti-literalism taking root, but there was also a growing indifference to the overall destiny (spiritual or otherwise) of the New England colonists themselves. For example, in 1634 the well-read English bible scholar Joseph Mead (1586-1639), when asked for his opinion of the New England colonists, essentially said that he wished the colonists well but he did not think that the colonies – or more specifically, North America – had any importance in an eschatological sense. Mead even went as far as to say that he believed America was the land to which Satan and his armies had fled at some point in the remote past, because Christ’s message (which had been spread throughout the rest of the known world) had not been received by the indigenous peoples prior to the arrival of the Europeans. So according to Mead’s embarrassingly simple logic, Satan had retreated into the vast American wilderness in order to prevent the Indians from coming to Christ – and this would then explain the fact that the Indians had no clue as to who Christ was or what Christianity was all about.

 

Here, one should understand that at this time in history, when Mead made his judgment on North America, there already existed widespread speculation among Christian settlers as to the biblical origins of American Indians – because at this time, it was still believed by most Christians that the origin of every race, tribe and people on earth could be found in the pages of the Book of Genesis. The “discovery” of indigenous non-White peoples in the New World presented the Christian theologians with a great conundrum. It was not enough to simply state that the indigenous peoples had always lived in North America; a formal explanation would be required. So, many began to assume that the Indians might have been the descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. However, speculation about this eventually died out after countless attempts to convert the Indians had completely failed. In time, Joseph Mead’s negative view of North America and its indigenous population eventually found a significant base of support in England. Some people began to believe that the New World was in fact Satan’s den and that the Indians were nothing more than reincarnated “Canaanite” heathens, i.e. savage, idol-worshipping pawns of Satan.

 

It was only after Joseph Mead had been dead for more than half a century that a few New England colonists began responding (in the 1690s) to what he had said about America all those decades before. One of the New England respondents was Judge Samuel Sewall (1652-1730). Essentially Sewall stated in his response that he not only disagreed with the late Joseph Mead’s view that America would have no place in the Millennium (i.e. millennial reign of Christ), but Sewall went so far as to say that America would host the actual physical location of the future New Jerusalem. Accompanying this assertion was an unmistakable expression of colonial patriotism, as Sewall was unquestionably offended by Mead’s statements. Another New England respondent was the famous colonial preacher and polymath Cotton Mather (1663-1728) – the son of Increase Mather and grandson of John Cotton. In his response to Mead, Cotton Mather did not exhibit as much patriotism as Sewall. For example, he did not dare espouse the unorthodox view that the future seat of Christ’s Kingdom on earth would be located in America. Nevertheless, Mather did state that it was unreasonable to believe that, upon Christ’s return, America would have no role to play in the coming Millennium.

 

Overall, in these responses one could clearly detect an emerging, nascent American nationalism mixing with the older Puritan tradition of Judeocentric prophecy interpretation. Indeed, both American patriotism and Judeocentrism coalesced to create an unmistakable civic religion in what would become the United States.

 

The person of Cotton Mather should be discussed here a bit further because, in all honesty, he was quite an interesting historical figure and one who is perhaps underestimated in his contribution to helping form American identity. As a prolific author and confirmed polymath, Cotton Mather was interested and knowledgeable in a wide variety of subjects, and one of these subjects was Islam. He was very interested in Islamic culture, history, the Ottoman Empire, etc. It should be said that at this time in colonial history it was very popular to read the narratives of those who had been abducted and taken captive by the various American Indian tribes. Thus in a similar fashion (due to his great knowledge of Muslim cultures), Mather produced a number of popular stories on the experiences of Anglo-American sailors who had been taken captive by the infamous Barbary pirates.

 

Consequently, Cotton Mather’s writing contributed quite significantly to the formation of early American nationalism. For example, he would write about the various trials and degradations suffered by the American captives, and of the great need for them to persevere and hold on to their Christian faith. So these stories served to confirm and consolidate American national identity, and to foster an already growing sense of patriotism in the colonies.

 

As Cotton Mather grew older he became more acquainted with the non-literalist trends and hermeneutics back in England. And he saw that many people had been routinely disappointed with the literalist interpretations of various ministers – which is to say, many had become disappointed with those ministers who, based on their own literal interpretations of biblical text, had predicted that the Millennium would arrive on such and such a date. For example, some pastors predicted the Millennium would come in 1697, others said it would come in 1716, etc. Needless to say they were all proven wrong. At that point, after seeing the late 17th and early 18th century “great disappointments” among the religious masses, Cotton Mather began to question whether a purely literal approach to interpreting biblical prophecy was correct. Thus, Mather tried to establish something of a hybrid approach. Toward the end of his life, however, he became a convinced pre-millennialist like Joseph Mead, which is to say that Mather no longer believed the Jews had to be converted as a precondition prior to Christ’s return, and that the only thing preventing the events of the Apocalypse from being set in motion is the Will of God. In other words, Christ could return at any moment and there are no essential preconditions for the Second Coming.

 

In any event, by the mid-eighteenth century, after more than a century of Judeocentric indoctrination and pulpit-based propaganda, the English colonists of North America (and especially those in New England) began to see themselves as Jews, which is to say they began to strongly identify themselves as a Second Israel. This belief comes out especially strong in the years leading up to the American War of Independence – to form what the historian Nathan Hatch refers to as civil millenarianism. What Hatch means by the term “civil millenarianism” is that the idea of civic or patriotic duty and political involvement eventually coalesced with millenarian prophecy to create a civic belief system in which one’s political and national identity combines with one’s religious beliefs. And indeed, this was a phenomenon which was occurring to an enormous extent throughout New England and, by extension, throughout all of the other colonies as well – because, compared to all of the other colonies, New England dominated in terms of intellectual influence. So it is important for the reader to comprehend that practically all of these early “American” ideas and works have their origins in the long-deceased minds of New England’s foremost religious zealots.

 

And so, as we pass into the second half of the eighteenth century, when the British government intensified its perceived “tyranny” against the considerably free and prosperous colonials (via the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, etc.), the long-established tradition of Judeocentric prophecy interpretation (as well as the age-old belief in the “Turco-Catholic” Antichrist) was easily combined with American civil millenarianism in such a way as to portray the British government – and the embodiment of that government, King George III – as being the Antichrist or Satan incarnate. Naturally then, the eventual war against Britain came to be seen by many of those descended from Puritan stock as a grand cosmic, apocalyptic struggle between the forces of Good and Evil.

 

Of course many traditional American historians like to emphasize the mainstream view that the founders of the United States were great admirers and followers of the ideas of John Locke, and that they all categorically believed in “libertarian” type principles which include religious tolerance among other “enlightened” views such as freedom of speech, civil rights, limited government, property rights, etc. However, this mainstream view is not at all accurate. The truth of the matter is that the influence of millenarian Puritanism (aka Judeocentrism aka Christian Zionism) on the ideological foundations of the United States is grossly understated and underrepresented in the historiography of the American experience. This is a tradition which fundamentally denies religious tolerance, denies minority rights and denies freedom of expression. And this is the tradition upon which the United States was fundamentally founded.

 

Indeed it was civil millenarianism, specifically, which was the driving ideological engine behind the so-called American “Revolution” (i.e. War of Independence). Then, upon independence, the civil millenarian idea became embedded in the American national identity and consciousness. In other words, it became a part of what it means to be “American.” Thus, more and more Americans, post-independence, came to view themselves as the New Israel, the New Chosen People, the holders of another covenant with God, the Redeemer Nation, the last bastion of freedom on earth, etc., etc. The “snowball” began rolling downhill, so to speak. Hence it takes no great effort for one to see how this kind of civil millenarian belief system led to the modern civic religion of American Exceptionalism and the patently false and hypocritical view that America stands for “freedom and democracy” around the world.

 


 

                     Roots of American Christian Zionism, Part 2

 

 During the nineteenth century there came into being two quintessentially American religious movements: Mormonism and Seventh Day Adventism (aka Millerism). One of the things that really stands out about Mormonism, especially within the context of Judeocentric prophecy interpretation, is that the first Mormons (Joseph Smith, Orson Hyde, et al.) strongly believed that there were two “Chosen People”: the Jews and the Americans (or the “Second Israelites”). Likewise, according to Mormonism’s founder and life-long freemason Joseph Smith (1805-1844), there are two Jerusalems as well: the original biblical Jerusalem located in Palestine, and a New Jerusalem which would someday be established in North America. According to Smith, each city would house one of God’s two Chosen Peoples; the Jews would receive the old Jerusalem and the Americans would inherit the new. The Jews would be granted the earthly kingdom of God in Palestine, and the Christians (i.e. Protestants, and more specifically Mormons) would inherit the spiritual kingdom. Thus it was with the Mormons and their distinct brand of Protestant theology that there really began to evolve a well-articulated theological division between Jews and Americans, in contradistinction to the prior millennialist division between Jews and Christians.

 

As mentioned above, the other quintessentially “American” religious movement is Seventh Day Adventism founded by William Miller (1782-1849). Miller was someone who was incredibly interested in Judeocentric prophecy interpretation, and he actually “borrowed” the work of a number of English writers – and even the calendar system of the Karaite Jews – in order to advance his religious views and, specifically, to determine the precise date of the Second Coming which would then usher in the millennial reign of Christ on earth. He especially incorporated many of the writings of the renowned “Father of Classical Physics” Sir Isaac Newton, who himself expended a prodigious amount of intellectual energy into examining and interpreting biblical prophecies so as to determine the exact date of the “end of the world.”

 

According to Miller, the return of Christ would occur sometime between March 21, 1843 and March 21, 1844 – sometime in that one year period between the spring equinoxes. When the cut-off date came and went, as it inevitably did, Miller gave the excuse that he had made a mistake in his “calculations.” And so, he recalculated and came up with a new date: October 22, 1844. Of course, that date came and went and nothing happened – but it was really quite sad for his loyal followers, because, in preparation for the “big event,” they had sold off all of their earthly possessions and properties to the point where they had become penniless. This naturally caused Miller’s followers to go into a deep depression, which came to be known historically as the Great Disappointment.

 

In any event, it is important to note that the way in which William Miller differs from nearly all other Protestant religious leaders is that he was not Judeocentric at all. Instead he was a “supersessionist,” meaning he believed that the covenant which the Jews had once held with God was now held by Christians, i.e. the true Christian Church. Therefore, according to supersessionist belief, God no longer owed the Jews anything. As Miller himself once stated, “the Jew has had his day.” So again, Miller was not at all Judeocentric. And because he held a more negative opinion about Jews, Miller was harshly criticized and even condemned by many of America’s leading Protestant figures.

 

Now we come to the person who is regarded as the father of Evangelicalism: John Nelson Darby (1800-1882). Originally, Darby was an Anglican priest in Ireland who was staunchly against the Catholic Church and very interested in eschatology and prophecy interpretation. Eventually Darby came to repudiate the Anglican Church of Ireland and all churches everywhere. Darby then began advising his followers to cut themselves off from the world (or “worldly affairs”) – to neither participate in politics nor church life, and to fully prepare themselves for the return of Christ. Like the Mormons, Darby drew a sharp distinction between true Christians (i.e. Protestants), whom he collectively considered to be the “spiritual bride of Christ,” and Jews who comprised the “earthly bride.” Darby promoted the idea that Jews would receive an earthly inheritance (Israel) and Christians would be raptured up into heaven to be with Christ. All those who remained on earth would have to suffer greatly under the Antichrist due to all of the chaos and destruction generated through him.

 

Of course the most famous idea in all of Darby’s work is this idea of the “rapture” – a theological concept which is certainly very popular today among evangelicals in the United States. However, unlike many of his contemporaries and predecessors, Darby did not believe that the Jews would have to be converted to Protestantism in order to usher in the apocalypse. In other words, Darby was a convinced premillennialist; he believed that when the appointed time came, Christ would simply return. Then, upon his return, Christ would rapture up the elect (the spiritual bride) and they would disappear from the face of the earth. The Jews (the earthly bride) would then return to Palestine to exterminate all the Muslims and thus inherit the Holy Land. Then the Antichrist would emerge to usher in the Tribulation – a time of great terror and destruction, where all of the people remaining on earth would be greatly punished. According to Darby, this punishment would be meted out by God to non-Christians in general, but more specifically to Jews for their responsibility, as he saw it, for the crucifixion of Christ.

 

Thus Darby is often described as an anti-supersessionist (unlike the Seventh Day Adventists) because he, in some sense, does believe that the Jews are still the people of God. Even so, this is only a kind of ornamental anti-supersessionism, as Darby still believed that Jews would have to suffer during the Tribulation (like everyone else who remained on earth) and that only true Christians would escape the sheer horror of the apocalypse. It should further be known that Darby was actually quite harsh in his remarks on Jews and, indeed, he taught his followers to have this same contemptible attitude toward them (in striking contrast to modern-day Christian Zionists). In Darby’s view the Jewish people were nothing more than elements in the fulfillment of biblical prophecy; Jews were not people in themselves but only chess pieces in the fulfillment of a grand cosmic drama.

 

As already mentioned, John Nelson Darby was strongly anti-political. He quite openly stated (referring to himself and his followers), “We do not mix in politics; we are not of the world: we do not vote.” This is yet another way in which Darby’s evangelicals differ from their modern politically mobilized counterparts in America. And speaking of America, Darby did visit the country a number of times, and he had quite a lot of influence on various American preachers, especially one by the name of Dwight L. Moody (1837-1899). It was essentially Moody that began spreading Darby’s doctrine throughout the United States – a unique strain of biblical interpretation called “dispensationalism,” because both Darby and Moody believed that the Word of God comes forth and is revealed to humanity in special installments or “dispensations.”

 

And although John Nelson Darby’s anti-political message did resonate to an extent among some nineteenth century American evangelicals, ultimately it was a message that failed. This is because Americans have a long tradition of civil millenarianism (of mixing their religion in politics), which is fundamentally rooted in the New England Puritan idea that Americans are the New Chosen People and America is the New Israel. So, as one can discern from a number of his comments on America, Darby was quite dismayed at what he observed among those Americans who claimed to follow his ideas. It is important to point this out because, again, modern Christian Zionism is extremely political or “worldly.” Darbyite theology, on the other hand, advocated for a complete withdrawal from the world, not only from politics but from organized churches as well – and of course this latter position of Darby’s earned him a great deal of contempt and criticism from many of his contemporaries.

 

Perhaps the most important historical figure who laid the groundwork for modern Christian Zionism, which is to say the one person who was instrumental in adding a powerful political dimension to Christian Zionism, was William E. Blackstone (1841-1935). Blackstone was a businessman who found success early in life. Sometime after making his fortune, Blackstone decided to remove himself from the business world and dedicated himself to religious matters, specifically to Judeocentric prophecy interpretation. Here, he believed (unlike Darby) in active political involvement with the explicit mission of assisting Jews (yes Jews, not Christians) as much as possible. Blackstone published his first book on this subject in 1878 entitled Jesus Is Coming. In it he highlighted various “signs” which, he thought, conclusively demonstrated that the end of the age was near. It is important to note that, at this time in world history, the publishing of Blackstone’s work roughly coincided with the emergence of political Zionism among Jews in Europe.

 

As far as prophetic “signs” go, William Blackstone viewed Zionism as a sign which was very encouraging, and he did everything he possibly could to assist the likes of Theodor Herzl and other influential members of the World Zionist Congress. And indeed, Blackstone was a major friend to the Zionists. So much so that from the late nineteenth century into the early twentieth, Blackstone would write to one U.S. president after another, petitioning them to bring as many eastern European Jews into the country as possible and to assist in helping Zionist leaders create a Jewish state in Palestine. This was largely due to the news stories Blackstone read of the various anti-Jewish pogroms which were allegedly occurring in Russia at the time. And so, Blackstone wrote first to President Harrison on this issue, advocating for millions of eastern European Jews to come to America. Needless to say, his appeals were not successful immediately. But Blackstone was a dogged political activist. He would continue writing to other presidents and politicians on the Jewish issue and was especially successful in getting through to Woodrow Wilson. His letters to President Wilson were quite interesting because he would repeatedly drive home the point that if Wilson would assist the Jews and the Zionist effort to establish a Jewish state in Palestine, then Wilson would himself go down in history as one of the greatest world leaders of all time, along the lines of Cyrus the Great. It is very well known to historians that over the course of his political career Wilson had developed a deep-seated messiah complex, so Blackstone’s “tact” in dealing with Wilson (i.e. in comparing him to one of history’s great kings) was very shrewd indeed, and it yielded great results.

 

It should be mentioned that there is quite a bit of irony in William Blackstone’s career as a political activist, because despite the fact that he was someone who wanted to evict millions of Arabs from their ancestral lands in the Middle East, and despite the fact that he is considered a “founding father” of extreme right-wing Christian Zionism, Blackstone really was a progressive/left-wing “social gospel” Christian. For example, one of the institutions he was responsible for helping to establish was the International Court of Justice. And without question this is one of many “humanitarian” world bodies which today’s Christian Zionists regularly deride due to the fact that the ICJ happens also to condemn Israel on a regular basis. So it is certainly ironic that this man (Blackstone), whom Christian Zionists can trace their philosophical lineage to, was a strong supporter of the International Court of Justice.

 

When, during the early years of the twentieth century, the United States was witnessing the political formation of the burgeoning Jewish state via the Balfour Declaration of 1917, there again sprouted a distinct millenarian ethos. Evangelical leaders became more and more vocal in their support for the Jewish people to conquer Palestine and to dispossess and even exterminate all Muslims because, they maintained, the Jews are God’s “Chosen People.” Comparisons were easily made (as more and more Jewish “settlers” immigrated to Palestine) between what the Jews were doing to the Arabs and what the American settlers had already done to North America’s indigenous population. This is to say that there was a conscious effort – among religious, cultural and political elites – to associate the ongoing Jewish conquest of Palestine with the “heroic” idea of American Manifest Destiny. The utter extermination of Palestinians was viewed in a positive light, not only by Christian Zionist leaders but by major American media outlets as well. Americans and Jews were portrayed as having come together, as God’s People, in order to carry out their God-given mission to expand Judeo-Christian civilization as far afield as possible.

 

One must also understand that as Zionism was gaining influence politically, during the late nineteenth century, the imperialist mentality was also emerging in America. The cataclysmic War Between the States (1861-1865), in which nearly 1 million Americans lost their lives, was still a recent memory for most, and the vast majority wanted to somehow forget all the many pains which were caused by that especially cruel internecine war. Both Northerners and Southerners desperately craved some semblance of patriotic unity. The Spanish-American War would provide such a display of patriotism and national unity.

 

The 20 year period between the Spanish-American War (1898) and the end of World War I (1918) witnessed a profound resurgence of American patriotism which galvanized the nation like never before. It just so happens that these two pivotal decades also witnessed the influx of millions of Jewish immigrants (the largest influx of Jews in American history). In addition, the Federal Reserve System was also established during this era (via the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913), and for the first time in history Jewish political and economic power really began to consolidate itself in North America. So, all of these factors began to coalesce. It is by no means accidental that the Puritanical belief that Americans are God’s Chosen People was then projected on to the Zionists. Indeed, more and more Americans came to consider the Jews as a special kindred people – as being like themselves. It is therefore easy to see how it is an integral part of American culture to be pro-Jewish – this has been true, historically, since the earliest days of colonial settlement, long before the official establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. Today, it is even highly doubtful whether a genuine American identity could exist without there being a firm pro-Jewish ethos in place, despite what the ever-dwindling numbers of paleoconservatives have to say. It all goes back to the civil millenarian tradition which arose out of a Puritanical religious source in the 17th century and then mixed with a late 19th century imperialist worldview.

 

Hence the fanatical support for Israel among evangelicals (aka Christian Zionists) in the United States. The evangelical belief in the rapture and Judeocentric prophecy interpretation, in addition to the central role which the Jews and the state of Israel play in the evangelicals’ overall belief system – all these fundamental pillars of the Christian Zionist worldview translate to mean that evangelicals (and Christian Zionists in general) have to support Israel and the Jewish lobby in America. It is quite literally a part of their religion – and I dare say the number one tenet of their entire Weltanschauung – to be pro-Israel. Their support for Israel is so important, in fact, that if Israel ever ceased to exist, their religion would be proven wrong. So the evangelicals/Christian Zionists must do whatever they can to support Israel in any way possible.

 

Now, in addition to the Christian Zionists, there is one other group of people that one can definitely say is an inheritor of the pro-Jewish/pro-Israel tradition – and that group is the neoconservative faction. If neocons are not modern-day millenarians, then I (the author) don’t know who is! Just take a look at Francis Fukuyama’s book, The End of History (1992). In this (his most famous) work, Fukuyama states that, with the fall of the Soviet Union, liberal democracy has essentially triumphed over all other political systems worldwide. And like many other neocons, Fukuyama believes that America has the right and the moral duty to go forth and spread its special brand of “freedom and democracy” throughout the world. So again, one sees this Puritanical idea of America being a Second Israel favored by God – the same great “bastion of freedom” which the Puritans believed in from the time of their initial landing at Plymouth Rock all the way to the Revolutionary era. And of course this ties into the millenarian aspect as well – the idea of the democratic millennium, that democracy has conquered the world and dictatorship is gone forever. If Fukuyama’s book is not an overtly millenarian work, then (again, in the author’s opinion) nothing is! Then there are groups of neocons like the one which rabidly pushed for the Iraq War – the Project for the New American Century. I have a feeling that the only reason they did not call themselves the “Project for a New American Millennium” was because that title would sound too grandiose, and perhaps also blow their cover!

 

What is ironic about neoconservative historians is that they tend to downplay the effect of religion on American culture and on the founding of the United States. They claim that the founders were all secularists and that the religious nationalism of the Puritans was not an influential force in the country’s founding. This premise is of course 100 percent wrong. Nevertheless, the neocons are definitely a group which has inherited the millenarian tradition, and this fact explains quite well why neocons tend to agree on so many points with Christian evangelicals, especially with regard to their shared support for the state of Israel and the American Jewish lobby.

 

Indeed, the pro-Israel lobby in the United States is very influential, however were it not for the long tradition of forming American identity around Judeocentric and millenarian lines, it is highly dubious to suggest that the Israel lobby would have any power in the United States whatsoever. As already mentioned, it is simply a part of American culture to be pro-Jewish. This fact is what ultimately empowers the Israel lobby and it is the ultimate source of American support for the state of Israel, despite the fact that Israel offers no strategic benefit to the U.S. government, and despite the fact that Israel does not share any alleged “democratic values” with the United States or the broader West.

 

In his book Knowing Too Much (2012), American Jewish scholar Norman Finkelstein predicts that American support for Israel will eventually end as the knowledge of Israel’s atrocities spreads throughout the news media and as American Jews learn more and more about the true nature of Israeli aggression (given how cerebral and literate they tend to be). American Jews will therefore come to the conclusion that supporting Israel conflicts with their own predominantly liberal beliefs. And so, over time, as this tension becomes stronger and stronger, American Jews will cease supporting Israel as fervently as they once had, and this will lead to the eventual end of American support for Israel in general. This is Finkelstein’s claim, and it is ultimately flawed. Because, make no mistake: American support for Israel will not end.

 

Even if American Jews stop supporting Israel tomorrow, there are still many tens of millions of evangelicals supporting the Jewish state. There is still an entire cultural context of pro-Jewishness being a part of American identity and the belief (dating back to the time of the Puritans) that Americans are the New Israelites. This deep-seated pro-Jewish ethos (ingrained in the psyche of tens of millions of Americans) is something that would be much more difficult to uproot and eliminate than the pro-Israel views of the American Jewish minority (who are themselves split on the issue).

 

If we consider the evangelicals, support for Israel is the central tenet of their religion – it is not Jesus or God or the Holy Spirit, and it is certainly not any of the teachings of Jesus’s Sermon on the Mount. Support for Israel is the most fundamental idea behind evangelical Christianity or what could also be called Christian Zionism. And evangelicals will continue their support for Israel no matter what heinous atrocities that that illegal terrorist state continues to perpetrate against the indigenous non-Jewish peoples of the region. Evangelicals and Christian Zionists in general simply do not care. They evaluate the righteousness or unrighteousness of someone by the degree to which that person supports Israel. That kind of fanatical support is not going to vanish any time soon. So this problem is much more serious than Finkelstein realizes.

 

Make no mistake about it: the Zionist problem does not ultimately stem from American Jewish support for Israel. Rather, it is entirely rooted in the pro-Jewish culture, history, politics, identity and religious traditions of Gentile Americans – a religious, cultural, political and national bloc which constitutes the primary support for Israel’s dastardly deeds, and without which the Zionist state of Israel would have never come into being.

 

.

.

.

Click on this text to see Brother Nathanael Exposing Zionist Christians...

.

.

.

Click on this text to see How Christians were Hoodwinked by the Scofield Bible...

The Plot Against Christ

Introduction — Jan 2018

 

The Darkmoon website was attacked on January 15 by person(s) unknown and is now no longer available. The site has not been destroyed and can be revived easily enough in a couple of days if need be. For medical and family-related reasons, however, we have no intention of restoring the site until a later date. The article below was about to be published when the site was attacked.

 

The Plot Against Christ

Lasha Darkmoon — Darkmoon Jan 15, 2018

 

Is Christianity a “slave religion” designed to turn Christians into wimps and sissies? 

 Camel Eye of Needle

“It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” (Matthew: 19:24)

 

Christianity, we are frequently told, is a Jewish plot. It was cunningly designed to emasculate Christians and turn them into wimps. It does this by encouraging Christians to love their enemies and turn the other cheek. So goes a popular conspiracy theory popularized by the late White Nationalist leader Dr William Pierce. Root out Christianity and return to your pagan roots, Dr Pierce urges. Christianity is a “slave religion” and will turn you into a pathetic pacifist incapable of standing up to your enemies.

 

Here are some significant extracts from Pierce’s history of the White Race, Who We Are. These ideas have had a persuasive effect on many who were looking for pretexts to dump Christianity and find salvation elsewhere:

 

—  “For more than two centuries it [Christianity] festered in the sewers and catacombs of Rome, along with dozens of other alien religious sects from the Levant; its first adherents were Rome’s slaves, a cosmopolitan lot from all the lands conquered by the Romans. It was a religion designed to appeal to slaves: blessed are the poor, the meek, the wretched, the despised, it told them, for you shall inherit the earth from the strong, the brave, the proud, and the mighty; there will be pie in the sky for all believers, and the rest will suffer eternal torment. It appealed directly to a sense of envy and resentment of the weak against the strong.”

 

—  “A Frank of the seventh or eighth century would tremble in superstitious awe before some fragment of bone or vial of dried blood which the Church had declared a sacred relic with miracle-working powers—but if you smote him on the cheek you would have a fight on your hands, not another cheek turned. As for the brotherhood of man and equality in the eyes of the Lord, the Germans had no time for such nonsense; when confronted with non-Whites, they instinctively reached for the nearest lethal weapon.”

 

—  “Slave Morality. But Christian ethics—the slave morality preached in the Roman catacombs—was like a time bomb ticking away in Europe—a Trojan horse brought inside the fortress, waiting for its season. That season came, and the damage was done. Today Christianity is one of the most active forces working from within to destroy the White race.”

 

—  “The inversion of natural values inherent in the exalting of the botched, the unclean, and the poor in spirit in the Sermon on the Mount—the injunction to “resist not evil”—all are prescriptions for racial suicide. Indeed, had a fiendishly clever enemy set out to concoct a set of doctrines intended to lead the White race to its destruction, he could hardly have done better.”

 

—  Extracts from William Pierce’s “Who We Are”. (Emphasis added)

 

You get the idea. Christianity is the great weakener. If you want to be strong, dump Christianity.

 

Dr Pierce’s ideas are well-expressed and obviously sincere, but other thinkers before him had nurtured the same beliefs.  Dr Pierce was clearly influenced by Nietzsche who had raved against Christianity in his Antichrist. Note this. There is not a single historical fact in Nietzsche’s rhetoric: just fine words and histrionic posturing, befitting a man who sounded more like a mad prophet than a wise philosopher.

 

Let’s hear what Nietzsche has to say. It is even more extreme, verging on hysteria, than anything Dr Pierce had to say. We are used to this sort of thing now, but in 1895, when these words first burst into print, they must have struck most readers as the ravings of a lunatic:

 

“Christianity remains to this day the greatest misfortune of humanity…. Our age knows better. What was formerly merely sickly now becomes indecent—it is indecent to be a Christian today…. I call Christianity the one great curse, the one great intrinsic depravity, the one great instinct of revenge, for which no means are venomous enough, or secret, subterranean and small enough—I call it the one immortal blemish upon the human race.”

 

— Friedrich Nietzsche, The Antichrist

 

Can you see a single factual statement here? Unfortunately, you cannot. You see only rhetoric and mood music, the verbal froth and fury of a man who was at the end of his tether and was soon to be pronounced clinically insane.

 

You can’t have it both ways. If the Jews invented Christianity as a cunning ploy to weaken Christians and turn them into natural-born slaves, which is what the Christ-bashing conspiracy theorists maintain, then you need to explain why the Jews have spent so much of their time and energy, ever since the foundation of Christianity, trying to destroy the very thing they should never have created in the first place. Why create a Frankenstein monster in Palestine 2000 years ago—i.e., Christianity, under the alleged distorter and corrupter of Christ’s original teachings, St Paul—in order to spend the next 2000 years trying to destroy it? The inability to answer this simple question has never troubled the conspiracy theorists who move in a world beyond the tedious limitations of logic and fact.

 

I will ask this awkward question again and challenge the Christ-bashing conspiracy theorists to answer it: If Christianity is so mad, bad and dangerous to organized Jewry that they should have spent the last 2000 years trying to destroy it, why did they bother to create it in the first place under the aegis of the allegedly wicked and scheming St Paul?

 

If you can answer that, fine; if you cannot, why keep spreading these preposterous conspiracy theories?

 

We need to clarify here that neither Nietzsche nor Dr William Pierce went so far as to state that Christianity had actually been cooked up and planned by an evil cabal of Jews, with St Paul as the ringleader, so as to bring the whole edifice of Christianity crashing down like a house of cards at some later date. This is a much later conspiracy theory which is in vogue today among the more wild-eyed Christophobes who infest the internet. The reader will be familiar with these types, for whom no evidence for their bizarre theories is ever necessary.

 

—  §  —

 

Another fatal flaw in the argument of these logically challenged conspiracy theories theorists is their glib assumption that Christians have all read Christ’s Sermon on the Mount and been profoundly influenced by its message. Having been infected by Christ’s noble words in St Matthew’s Gospel, these 2.1 billion Christians have all decided to implement its instructions to the letter, swept away by devout enthusiasm. One can imagine some hypothetical individual, at one moment a fierce Viking warrior, suddenly morphing into a pathetic wimp after picking up his New Testament and casting an eye over its contents—something he would have been most unlikely to do in any case, given that New Testaments and Bibles in the vernacular were almost non-existent in those distant days before the invention of the printing press in the mid-fifteenth century. Most Bibles were then in Latin, totally inaccessible to all but an infinitesimal minority of learned monks and clerics.

 

You are being asked to believe the absurdity that 2.1 billion Christians have been exposed to the extreme pacifism of Christ’s Sermon on the Mount—in which they are told to turn the other cheek and love their enemies—and that this exposure to Christ’s pacifist ideas has induced a mass hypnosis in them, turning 2.1 billion Christians into wimps and sissies. But since when did the injunction “Be ye therefore perfect” produce perfection? Long before Christ came on the scene, telling us to be perfect, Moses had given the Jews the Ten Commandments. Have these commandments, drummed into the Jewish mind over the millennia, produced a race of model citizens? No, they have certainly not. They have had no effect whatever in turning Jewish sinners, en masse, into Jewish saints. So why should Christ’s pacifist teachings turn most Christians into servile sissies when Moses’ Ten Commandments have notably failed to turn most Jews into paragons of virtue?

 

I wish someone had asked Dr Pierce this question: Do most Christians, when you strike them on the right cheek, turn the other cheek and invite you to strike that cheek also? If so, I have yet to come across one such Christian.

 

One has only to look at the blood-soaked history of Europe and America to see that Christians are among the most belligerent people on earth, despite the pacifist teachings of Christianity. Ever since the foundation of Christianity, Christian nations have waged war without ceasing, killing off vast numbers of people without agonizing too much about it. The Crusades were not fought by pathologically altruistic Christians. Nor was the British Empire, on which the sun never set, acquired by exemplary Christians with a sword in one hand and a New Testament in the other. In short, Christianity has had no effect whatsoever in turning its adherents into limp-wristed poltroons. If this is why the Jews “invented” Christianity—to emasculate Chrisitans—they failed spectacularly.

 

Christ’s Sermon on the Mount, ironically, didn’t even turn Christ into a wimp. For if Christ had followed his own teachings at all times, he would hardly have taken a whip to the moneychangers in the temple. The same man who said “Blessed are the peacemakers” also said, “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.”

 

—  §  —

 

The world would be an infinitely worse place today if all of us were to give up our religious beliefs and become atheists instead, given that more millions (100 million-plus) have died under atheistical Communism in the 20th century than at any other time in history.

 

One of the most brilliant mathematicians and philosophers of the 17th century, Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), had a mind-altering mystical experience which turned his entire life upside down. There was no need for any tiresome logic chopping, ratiocination or “empirical evidence” after that. He had entered into intimate contact with the Divine. And that’s all that mattered:

 

“On 23 November 1654, between 10:30 and 12:30 at night, Pascal had an intense religious vision and immediately recorded the experience in a brief note to himself which began: “Fire. God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, not of the philosophers and the scholars…” and concluded by quoting Psalm 119:16: “I will not forget thy word. Amen.” He seems to have carefully sewn this document into his coat and always transferred it when he changed clothes; a servant discovered it only by chance after his death.”

 

When it comes to the difference between faith and what the scoffers like to call “blind belief”, Pascal said it best: “The heart has its reasons, which reason does not know. We feel it in a thousand things. It is the heart which experiences God, and not the reason. This, then, is faith: God felt by the heart—not by reason.” (See here)

 

These words bring to mind Hamlet’s famous comment to his friend Horatio, “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” Words that were more or less echoed in the twentieth century by the great biologist J.B.S. Haldane: “The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.”

 

In the last analysis, there is every reason to believe that Christianity and the great Oriental religions—in particular Buddhism and Vedanta—are perfectly compatible with modern science. According to Vedanta, Mind is everything. Mind did not arise out of matter, but matter out of mind. In the beginning, only Mind existed.

 

The great physicist Sir James Jeans was once asked in an interview: “Do you believe that life on this planet is the result of some sort of accident, or do you believe that it is a part of some great scheme?” He replied:

 

“I incline to the idealistic theory that consciousness is fundamental, and that the material universe is derivative from consciousness, not consciousness from the material universe. In general, the universe seems to me to be nearer to a Great Thought than to a great machine. It may well be that each individual consciousness ought to be compared to brain-cell in a Universal Mind.

 

Take some time now to consider the work of the theoretical physicist and theologian John Charlton Polkinghorne. Born in 1930, Polkinghorne managed to combine quantum physics and mathematics with Christian theology, becoming a practicing Anglican priest while serving as Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge University. He achieved this synthesis in several acclaimed books which included The Quantum World (1989), Quantum Physics and the World (1989), Quantum Physics and Theology: An Unexpected Kinship (2005), Exploring Reality: The Intertwining of Science and Religion (2007), and Questions of Truth (2009).

 

Polkinghorne was knighted by the Queen of England in 1997, and in 2002 he received the £1 million ($1.45 million) Templeton Prize, awarded for “exceptional contributions to affirming life’s spiritual dimension.”

 

When political radicals like William Pierce call for the death and destruction of Christianity, they have no concept what cultural vandalism they are advocating. Renaissance masterpieces produced by Christian artists like Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and Raphael are among the most celebrated works of art ever produced. If Christianity had been aborted in the womb or destroyed in its infancy, none of these great works of genius would ever have seen the light of day, for Christianity provided the rich soil which gave them birth.

 

The most admired classical music in the Western canon is the Christian sacred music of composers like Pachelbel, Vivaldi, Bach, Handel, Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, Schubert and Verdi. Many well-known historical figures who influenced Western science considered themselves Christian: Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Boyle.

 

According to 100 Years of Nobel Prize (2005), a review of Nobel prizes awarded between 1901 and 2000, 65.4% of Nobel Prize Laureates have identified Christianity in its various forms as their religious preference (423 prizes). Overall, Christians have won a total of 78.3% of all the Nobel Prizes in Peace, 72.5% in Chemistry, 65.3% in Physics, 62% in Medicine, 54% in Economics and 49.5% of all Literature awards.” (See Role of Christianity in Civilization).

 

By all means disparage Christianity if that’s what you need to do, but at least take the trouble to find out the names of the stellar luminaries you are disparaging. Ask yourself, in all honesty, if your own contributions to human welfare have been greater than those provided by renowned Christians—I pick out their names at random—like Pascal, Mozart, Beethoven, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, JS Bach, Botticelli, Tintoretto, Velazqez, Michaelangelo, Milton, Leonardo da Vinci, Copernicus, Galileo, Leibniz, Lavoisier, Marconi, Mendel, Tielhard de Chardin, Swedenborg, Albertus Magnus, Thomas More, JRR Tolkien, William Tyndale, William Wilberforce, Dietrich Bohhoeffer, Meister Eckhart, Erasmus, St Teresa of Avila, Joan of Arc, Florence Nightingale, and a thousand other illustrious names one could invoke in a long litany of praise.

 

Collage of Christians

Click to enlarge

Collage of photos of 49 renowned Christians from all walks of life: Saint PeterPaul the ApostleJohn of DamascusSaint HelenaSaints Cyril and MethodiusThe Romanovs, Sun Yat-senConstantine the GreatCharlemagneJoan of ArcThomas AquinasAugustine of HippoCatherine of Siena, Antoni GaudíMichelangeloJean-Bapt iste de La SalleMaria TheresaJean CalvinTeresa of ÁvilaAnton ChekhovBrothers GrimmIsaac NewtonMartin LutherChristopher ColumbusLudwig van BeethovenGalileo GalileiWilliam ShakespeareWolfgang Amadeus MozartLeonardo da VinciThérèse of LisieuxGregor MendelJohn D. RockefellerFlorence NightingaleLouis PasteurMax PlanckMartin Luther King Jr.Mother TeresaJohn F. KennedyPatriarch Bartholomew I of ConstantinoplePope John Paul IILeo TolstoyLuiz Inácio Lula da SilvaNelson MandelaLionel MessiCarlos Slim HelúMarissa MayerNovak DjokovicGerard ButlerFreida Pinto. (See here)
 

—  §  —

 

The glory that was Greece and the grandeur that was Rome had its culmination in the magnificent achievements of Europe and its people over the centuries. Whatever has been greatest in the last 2000 years of European civilization since Golgotha, and whatever bears the stamp of its transcendent genius, was nurtured in the rich soil of Christianity. Europe would be a dead husk, a barren desert plunged in spiritual darkness, were it not for its Christian heritage.

 

The fate of  Western civilization now lies in the balance and is threatened as never before. Abandoning Christianity, the source of our inner strength, would be a recipe for disaster and only hasten our doom.

 

Scene: The Plaça de Sant Roc in Sabadell, a city in Catalonia, Spain, nestling on the banks of the lazy River Ripoli with its orange orchards and flour mills. Here you will find a few local musicians, in the market square, playing the most inspired music ever composed in the history of our planet. It is the Ode to Joy from the finale of Ludwig van Beethoven’s majestic Ninth Symphony (1824). Never before had mankind enjoyed the privilege of listening to such supernaturally sublime music—music utterly steeped in the ethos of Christianity out of which it arose, and whose numinous beauty has haunted even the minds of the most devout atheists.

 

Listen to it now and reflect: Christianity gave us this precious gift. No neo-pagan, no humanist, no atheist or nihilist has ever produced a note of music to match this. Nor ever will.

 

VIDEO : 5:41 mins


About Lasha Darkmoon

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website, Darkmoon.me, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

 
 
_____________________________________________

 

 

What it means to be 

‘pro Israel’


It means you’ve lost your freedom

and you think mass murder is OK


Americans are the hired hitmen of the Jews, destabilizing all societies and then feasting on the carcasses, like true vampires.


There is a new secret police in America and it is Jewish. This police force doesn’t fight crimes, it commits them.


The truth and the law no longer coincide.



By John Kaminski

http://johnkaminski.org



The main obstacle in dealing with most of my fellow Americans is how absent of moral compass they have become. Their actions have shrunk to the size of their intellects. They genuflect toward goodness, but overlook the blood constantly spilled in their names. To them, honesty has become a naive anachronism; profitable ways to circumvent the law are now admired.  How lost people are, how absolutely certain of their own ignorance, how they lie to themselves. As long as their addictions and compulsions are sated, they are stunningly willing to fight to the death for ideas they do not thoroughly comprehend.


For instance, the United States surrounds Russia today with tanks, troops and missiles, yet the only topic found in Western media is what a profound threat Russia is to the United States. It’s a classic war-is-peace trick, and the world suffers mightily for it. The U.S. military budget is ten times Russia’s. Sen. John “Insane” McCain was not happy until President Donald Trump fired missiles into Syria for reasons that were totally bogus. How much more do you need to know? Apparently, a lot more.


Americans badly need to realize they have been consigned to the wrong side of history, where all of their considerable triumphs have ended in a pockmarked landscape of abandoned businesses, streetwalkers selling crack, and people shot in the back of the head because they developed health products that actually worked. We have been set up for destruction by treasonous leaders who got rich by impoverishing our country.


In between taking bribes from billionaires and raping children, our leaders remain securely in the pocket of a foreign power which makes them rich beyond their wildest dreams and the rest of us broke beyond our worst nightmares.


As we are plucked of our money by bizarre schemes and programs that have nothing to do with the welfare of the people, the world is plundered by charlatans who bet on disasters and then create them. Most of the people in the world are crushed, or at least badly deformed, by this. Their cosmic destinies remain unfulfilled as they struggle for subsistence-level survival.


Americans are the hired hitmen of the Jews, destabilizing all societies and then feasting on the carcasses, like true vampires. Criminalizing all thoughts that don’t ultimately feed the beast, and murdering anyone who threatens their hateful hegemony. 


Heck, they’re carving up the corpses of Syria and Iraq right now, terraforming them into military bases and oil transport points, with tens of thousands dead in the process and the rest invading Europe. This process, including the murder of Qaddafi, was a work of Jewish genius to destabilize all of Europe in one fell swoop.


I have always been amazed at how few people actually possess a social conscience. And it has never been worse then now, when most people are trying to diagnose the ills of the world without realizing their own attitude is the most relevant component of their task.


Relying on mainstream history guarantees you will not see the hidden hand behind the horror that remains everpresent today in every law that says you are not permitted to think about certain subjects, nor should you express them publicly.


If you believe in what’s right, how can you tolerate two Rothschild candidates running for president, not just last time, but every time?


It’s like, throughout history, swindlers have won the day every time and people have just gone along with it. So now we have bogus religion that doesn’t work except through willful ignorance, and government that is obviously a robber’s free-for-all, and we still remain blockheaded about why we are always invading some other country for reasons that are always false. Start with both World Wars and descend into the pit of Hell from there.


What I do know is so tragically horrible there’s no way to put a positive spin on it, when all of the elements of destruction are massed on the horizon awaiting our next false move. It’s such a waste. Life could be so grand.


Specializing in horror and hate


If you’re pro-Israel you applaud the gratuitous murders of Palestinian children, whose organs are then stolen and given to decrepit old Jews desperate to extend their warped lives. From the middle 1940s on, Jews have decimated the local population in Palestine with a wanton genocide that continues to this current moment. Pictures of what the Jews have done to this poor tribe (and the rest of the world) are straight out visions of Hell, with crumbled houses, bleeding children and a world that has long since looked the other way.


Pro-Israel fans endorse poisoning wells, starvation and beheadings, which are Jews’ favorite methods of eliminating those called goyim, a Hebrew word that means cattle. This is why they have so many beheadings in Saudi Arabia, a member in good standing of those countries known as national killing machines, or neocon nations (those fake conservatives who used to be Communists). Here is America we have all our food and medicine poisoned by Jewish pharmaceutical giants and all our entertainment turned into suicidal psychodramas by Jewish music producers that urge black people to rise up and kill whites.


If you are ‘pro-Israel’ you support all these things.


Lately the Jews have taken to incarcerating 80-year-old women for telling the truth about World War II and lampooning the lies of the magic 6 million figure which Jewish media have made into a slogan central to their new Holocaust religion — “We have suffered; you should pay us for that!”


In Germany especially but also in other European countries, the truth and the law do not coincide. These EU countries have lost their freedom and people in them are not allowed to speak their minds in any way that differs from what their government says about certain events of the past. 


These restrictions always concern the Jewish history of the World Wars and their fabricated death toll of the fabled 6 million that have enabled them to fleece billions out of innocent countries thanks to strategically positioned Jewish judges and politicians. Hitler is the most hated man on the planet because of the false stories Jews told about him. Yet in his own country, and among people around the world who understand what real freedom is, Hitler was and is beloved as no U.S. president ever has been.


As you read this today, the negative feelings in your mind that you have about Hitler are all as a result of the massive public relations campaign to denigrate his plan to escape from the clutches of the Jewish world bankers. It was a war he would ultimately lose, and there went the last chance humanity had to escape from the Jewish world bank that is now using its financial trickery to strangle the life out of the planet.


To be a Jew is a crime against humanity


There is a new secret police in America and it is Jewish. This police force doesn’t fight crimes, it commits them.


Every politician in America owes his position to a Jewish financier, whose loans allow candidates to prevail in manipulated elections.


Politically correct functionaries determine which children will receive more complete educations. The rest are consigned to a pablum exclusively designed for Deltas and Epsilons. This is how the Jews achieved dominance on a scholastic level, having Jewish administrators ease their passage to the upper levels of non Jewish organizations.


To be a Jew is a crime against humanity. Jews have no integrity. They have only an instinctual urge for vengeance which they are programmed to inflict on everyone else. Jews are immune to both logic and compassion, which is why it makes no sense to ever argue with them. The bottom line is their only marker, which is why everything they touch eventually sinks to the bottom, only they never suffer the losses, only their duped victims do.


They irradiated 100,000 of their own Sephardic children back in the 1950s, presumably to maintain Ashkenazi supremacy within Israel. But that was only a single incident. <http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-ringworm-children.html>


Thanks to the multigenerational purveyor of criminal sabotage Monsanto, we have a poison called Glyphosate sprayed on every piece of food in the supermarket which assures serious diseases will seriously affect subsequent generations if the consumer is not killed outright.


The Jews are responsible for the murders of millions of people throughout history, a fact that remains mostly unknown because these same Jews control virtually all of the world’s media.


I’ve seen the faces of Jewish soldiers manhandling old Palestinian women. Worse is how the self-described Israeli defense forces shoot Arab children for sport and joke about it. Even though they claim to be the only humans and everybody else to be farm animals, in this and so many other matters, Jewish behavior is decidedly not human.


Bringers of darkness


Just remember you know nothing about what’s going on in the world, and you never will unless you become willing to look at yourself and our situation much more seriously than you ever have. And as always, tomorrow might be too late.


To be pro-Israel is to be pro-genocide and profoundly deceitful about how you relate to the rest of the world. In the court of human opinion you’d be declared insane by healthy people, who know that building your own fortune is the way to a healthy life whereas swindling your way to happiness will ultimately make you sick.


Jews should never be allowed to hold positions of trust, because they will always be subverting and sabotaging others in service to the dastardly schemes of their own tribe. You see it everywhere.


If you are pro-Israel, you can do anything you want and get away with it. Especially if you are Jewish, you can commit any crime you choose and escape to Israel, where no one can ever touch you. 


As this hateful reality spreads through every country in the world, refusal to address this problem means the end of freedom as we have known it. If you are pro-Israel, you like this idea.

 

 

 

IIn 1948 Zionist Jews from all over the world came to Palestine and founded Israel. It was considered a “miracle” by Christians and a blessing from God. But immediately, the Jews began a bloody ethnic cleansing—a genocidal murder—of the resident Palestinians. Suddenly, things went murky and dark. Today Israel threatens the whole world with its many nuclear bombs. Its military force is paid for by the U.S.A.

Is Israel really a blessing or is it a curse and plague on the world? Does DNA Science prove the “Jews” to be imposters, Khazars not related to Abraham and the ancient prophets? Is this new nation, in fact, the “Synagogue of Satan?” Have Christians been horribly deceived?

Hear biblical and scientific evidence by pastors, rabbis, and scholars as the issue is resolved once and for all. Who are God’s Chosen People? Is Israel a miracle, or is it a deliberate satanic hoax?

"Marching to Zion," a documentary by Baptist Pastor Steven Anderson shows that Christians finally are realizing they've been scammed by Zionists, whether they be Christian or Jewish.

They're finally recognizing that Judaism is a satanic cult masquerading as a religion. The real Covenant is between God and them, i.e. believers in Christ.

They were deceived by the Scofield Bible which was financed and promoted by Zionist bankers. Christian Zionist pastors like John Hagee, Benny Hinn and Joel Osteen are apostates and traitors. Pro-Zionist US politicians like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, Scott Walker and Rand Paul are also traitors.

When Christians realize this, they'll understand that the Dept. of Homeland Security and NSA are there to protect the Federal Reserve Bank and the Zionist political establishment from the wrath of the American people when they realize their country has been stolen out from under them. Terrorism is a pretext manufactured by the CIA and FBI.
.