The War on Christianity, Part II:
The Abomination and Blasphemy of Christian Zionism
by... JAMES PERLOFF
(Picture credit unknown)
This post is long. It is long because Christian Zionism is based on a multitude of lies. The bigger the onion, the
more the layers we are forced to peel off. I should also note that my paternal ancestors were Russian Jews (see photo below,
taken about 1900). My great-grandfather’s name was Abraham Perlovsky. People who criticize Zionism are frequently accused
of being motivated by anti-Semitism. As I’m half-Jewish myself, let me be clear that no such
feelings impel me. I am unequivocally opposed to racism in any form.
Part 1 of this series explored how the Rockefellers were instrumental in orchestrating the Modernist movement, assaulting every
fundamental doctrine of Christianity, for the long-range ecumenical purpose of absorbing it into a one-world religion. The
Fundamentalist movement rejected Modernism, intending to stand by the faith’s original tenets.
Unfortunately, as we will now see, Fundamentalism was itself infiltrated
and hijacked, consistent with the Rothschild strategy of funding both sides of wars. Fundamentalist churches were targeted
to enlist their support for the Zionist agenda. The two principal agents in this scheme were John Nelson Darby (1800-1882)
and Cyrus Scofield (1843-1921). What Darby planted, Scofield watered and disseminated. The theology they developed served
the agenda by making several claims:
• God wanted the Jews to return to, and take over, Palestine.
• God has two plans of salvation—one through the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the other a guarantee reserved
for Jews, his “Chosen People.”
• Christians should not
involve themselves in politics, education, business or the arts, as these are “worldly” matters that should be
left in the hands of “worldly” people. (The consequences of this doctrine are very visible in American culture
• God deals with mankind differently during different historical
time frames or “dispensations,” of which there are seven. The current one, “Grace” under Jesus Christ,
is merely the sixth of the seven dispensations.
• The Christian Church
is doomed to inevitable failure, which will bring the Dispensation of Grace to a close.
• The end of this dispensational age will be marked by the Tribulation—worldwide persecution under
the Antichrist for a period of seven years; however, Christians need not concern themselves with this, since Jesus will
“Rapture” believers off the Earth and they won’t be around to experience it.
• Earth will then experience a Jewish era; Jewish ritualistic animal sacrifices will be reinstituted;
Jesus will reign for a thousand years from Solomon’s rebuilt temple in Jerusalem.
These doctrines, whose main outcome was “Christian Zionism,”
might seem boring to atheists and agnostics, but they are nonetheless exceedingly relevant to the state of the world. They
are espoused by celebrity-status theologians like Hal Lindsey, Pat Robertson and John Hagee, in the best-selling Left
Behind book series, and are prevailing views in many conservative evangelical churches. Without these ideas being sweepingly
disseminated, there might have been no Israeli state created in 1948, no 9/11, and no Middle East wars.
Before proceeding, I’m aware that some readers may be visiting this
website for the first time, so I’ll take a moment to “begin at the beginning.” The United States, and
much of the world itself, is run by an incalculably wealthy oligarchy known as, among other names, the Illuminati.
The trappings of “democracy” are an illusion; the oligarchy operates behind the scenes, choosing presidents
and prime ministers long before the public goes to the polls. It owns and controls the central banks, most of the ”Fortune
500” corporations, and the mainstream media (CNN, Fox, BBC, etc.), the latter being crucial to keeping the agenda,
and the oligarchy itself, concealed from public awareness. It coordinates its global policies through international organizations
such as the Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission, and an upper, exclusive level of Freemasonry. The cabal’s highest
identifiable human center is the Rothschild banking dynasty. But the oligarchy is not only about materialistic matters such
as money and power; like the universe itself, it possesses a spiritual dimension: its outlook is satanic, which
largely accounts for Western culture’s rapid moral descent.
I cannot document and prove these claims in one paragraph, but I can in a book, which is why
I wrote Truth Is a Lonely Warrior. The ultimate goal of the Illuminati is a world government. Regional blocs like the European Union and NAFTA (intended
to become a North American Union) are stepping stones toward this end. The world government will be ruled by a dark figure
whom the Bible calls the “beast” or “Antichrist.” The book of Revelation says he will have “authority
over every tribe, people, language and nation.” The capital of this evil world government will be Jerusalem,
a city revered by Christians, Muslims and Jews alike, to be centered in Greater Israel. It was for this purpose that:
• the Rothschilds committed their fortune
to the Zionist movement, beginning no later than 1829;
• Theodor Herzl began hosting the World Zionist congresses in Basle,
Switzerland in 1897;
• the British government was persuaded to issue
the Balfour Declaration to Lord Walter Rothschild in 1917, promising the Zionists “establishment in Palestine of a
national home for the Jewish people” in exchange for the Zionists bringing America into World War I on Britain’s
However, Zionist seizure
of Palestine could not have occurred without the consent and cooperation of the world’s Christian community.
Given the centuries-old conflict between Jews and Christians, it was necessary to remold Christian theology to accommodate
the Rothschild plan. Cyrus Scofield and his reference Bible came on the scene for this express purpose.
Darby Plants the Seeds
Before examining Scofield’s life, we should note a little about John
Nelson Darby, the principle figure from whom Scofield borrowed his Biblical analysis. Darby was a Satanist, Freemason and
agent of the Rothschild-owned British East India Company,1 the latter being the most powerful multinational corporation
of its day and the supplier that turned millions of Chinese into opium addicts. Darby’s family owned Leap Castle, renowned as the most sinister and occult castle in Ireland’s history.
Darby became a leader of a Christian sect called the Plymouth Brethren
(named for Plymouth, England, where its most popular gatherings were held). He is generally credited with originating the
“Secret Rapture” doctrine and made several trips to America to spread his ideas.
Darby used many terms in common with occult Theosophists—he
referred to Jesus as “the coming one” (same term New Agers use for the Antichrist); referred to God
as the “architect” (same phrase employed by Freemasons, meaning “God” for the uninitiated, “Lucifer”
to true adepts); and many other occult phrases, as summarized in this article.
Darby even penned his own
satanic version of the Bible. The Illuminati have always known they could not perform a wholesale transformation of the
Bible, because it would be recognized as such and rejected. Therefore the approach through the centuries has been to whittle
it away: a word here, a phrase there—the universal strategy of boiling the frog.
Darby slyly introduced satanic wording into the Biblical text. For example,
in the King James rendering of John 6:69, Peter told Jesus: “And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ,
the Son of the living God.” Darby rendered this: “And we have believed and known that thou art the holy one
of God.” “Holy one of God” is a title used for Jesus only by demons in the King James. For a comprehensive
review of Darby’s satanic mistranslations, see the article John Nelson Darby Version: Doctrinal Changes to the Holy Bible.
Spreads Darby Like a Virus
Theodore Herzl began hosting the Rothschild-backed Zionist congresses in Switzerland, developing the plan for Zionist takeover
of Palestine. Knowing this scheme would require Christian approval, in 1904 Herzl approached Pope Pius X, who very politely
told him what he could do with his plan. After Catholic rejection, the Rothschilds knew Protestant support would be essential.
But this could only be achieved by tampering with the Bible to make it appear God himself had ordained that Jews retake
Palestine. Such a Bible would have to come from a non-Jew, someone with credentials as a theologian. Thus emerged Cyrus
Scofield and his reference Bible.
Scofield started out as a crooked Kansas lawyer and politician,
working under the auspices of John J. Ingalls, a major figure in corrupt Kansas politics. In 1881, the Atchison Globe
C. I. Schofield [sic], who was appointed United States District Attorney for Kansas in 1873, and
who turned out worse than any other Kansas official, is now a Campbellite
preacher in Missouri. His wife and two children live in Atchison. He contributes nothing to their
support except good advice.2
That same year, the Topeka Daily Capital picked up the story:
Cyrus I. Schofield, formerly of Kansas, late lawyer,
politician and shyster generally, has come to the surface again, and promises once more to gather around himself that halo
of notoriety that has made him so prominent in the past. The last personal knowledge that Kansans have had of this peer
among scalawags, was when about four years ago, after a series of forgeries and confidence games he left the state and a
destitute family and took refuge in Canada. For a time he kept undercover, nothing being heard of him until within the past
two years when he turned up in St. Louis, where he had a wealthy widowed sister living who has generally come to the front
and squared up Cyrus’ little follies and foibles by paying good round sums of money. Within the past year, however,
Cyrus committed a series of St. Louis forgeries that could not be settled so easily, and the erratic young gentleman was
compelled to linger in the St. Louis jail for a period of six months.3
However, court cases against Scofield were inexplicably dropped. As Joseph
M. Canfield, who is probably Scofield’s most thorough biographer, notes: “The very sudden dropping of the criminal
charges without proper adjudication suggests that Scofield’s career was in the hands of someone who had clout . .
According to Scofield, his conversion to Christ occurred
in 1879 in his “St. Louis law office.” However, he was not a member of Missouri’s bar, and no record exists
of his practicing law in that state5—in fact, he was habitually on the run from the law.
Scofield began immersing himself in Darby’s
teachings. He was mentored by Rev. James H. Brookes, whose very pulpit Darby had preached from.6 He made rapid
ecclesiastical progress: by 1881 he was already a pastor in St. Louis, despite having no seminary training or other formal
Scofield moved to Dallas and began an extended term as pastor of the First Congregational Church. Possibly this move was
necessitated because his criminal past and familial irresponsibility were too well-known in the Kansas-Missouri region.
As Rev. John S. Torell writes:
There were a number of wealthy and political power brokers in the membership of the First Congregational Church
in Dallas. . . I do know that most churches in the United States are heavily infested with Freemasons. George Bannerman
Dealey was a member of the Westminster Presbyterian Church in the later part of his life. But he was also heavily involved
in the occult, majoring in the Scottish Rite of Masonry with a 33rd degree and active as a Shriner, and was also a member
of the Red Cross of Constantine. Most likely he had a hand in getting Cyrus into Masonic circles and particularly the Lotos
Club in New York.7
am well aware that a person redeemed by Christ receives forgiveness of sins. I am also aware that those born again remain
flawed individuals. Nevertheless, a high standard is held for pastors and elders of churches. In 1883, back in Kansas, Reverend
Scofield’s wife Leontine was granted a divorce on the grounds that he had long since abandoned her and their two daughters,
Abigail and Helene. The court ruled that Scofield “was not a fit person to have custody of the children.”8
Within six months of the divorce, Scofield married a new wife, Hettie.
Here is what the Bible says (1 Timothy 5:8): “But if any provide not for his
own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” Scofield’s
fans give him a free pass on this teaching, and not surprisingly, the Scofield Reference Bible makes no commentary on this
have argued that he had to divorce his wife because she was Catholic, but there is no Biblical grounds for that, and Scofield
had deserted his family long before his professed conversion to Christ. However, if handlers were prepping him to fulfill
the role of Zionist messenger to Protestant churches, it may well be that having a Catholic wife was deemed unsuitable.
Although Scofield became quite wealthy from
his reference Bible, there is no evidence that he ever shared his riches with his abandoned family, or ever made restitution
to people whom he had defrauded in Kansas and Missouri.
Truthfulness is another characteristic of genuine conversion. Here is how Scofield later described his military service
in his Who’s Who in America entry:
Pvt. Co. H. 7th Tenn. Inf. May 1861 to close of Civil War; served in Army of Northern Va. under Gen. Lee, and
awarded Cross of Honor for valor at battle of Antietam.9
Although Scofield was in the 7th Tennessee, this little entry is full of
falsehoods. Scofield did not serve until “the close of the war.” He successfully begged out of the service in
1862 on grounds that he was a Northerner (he was Michigan-born). Also, Scofield was not decorated for valor at the battle
of Antietam. Decorations were a frill the Confederate army could not afford. The Cross of Honor was a postwar decoration bestowed by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, beginning in 1900, to any veteran
who had provided “loyal, honorable service to the South.” As to having served “under Gen. Lee“—as
Canfield notes, this was only in the same sense that “GIs in WW2 were under Eisenhower.”10
Perhaps more egregiously, by 1892 Cyrus began
using the title “Dr. Scofield.” In the Scofield Reference Bible, he is “Rev. C. I. Scofield, D. D.”
(Doctor of Divinity). Conveying this landmark book as a scholar’s work was, of course, vital. However, there is no
evidence Scofield ever received a doctorate. He never attended a college or seminary. Some suggest he could have received
an honorary doctorate, but even this seems improbable: no institution has ever claimed credit for awarding it,
Scofield made no allusion to the degree’s source in his Who’s Who biography, and since Dispensationalism
was still viewed as highly unorthodox in 1892, no Christian institution would have likely bestowed such an honorary degree
Acquires Connections and Backers
met the distinguished theologian D. L. Moody during one of the latter’s evangelical campaigns. In 1886, Moody spoke
in Dallas at Scofield’s invitation. A loose association continued between them, and in 1896 Scofield moved to New
England, becoming pastor of Trinitarian Congregational, Moody’s home church. It is unclear if this occurred at Moody’s
request, but association with Moody gave Scofield another credential that advanced his theologian resumé. In December
1899, Moody died at 62 from an undiagnosed illness.
In 1901, Scofield became a member of New York’s exclusive, invitation-only Lotos Club, a hangout for the financial
and literary elite. Members have included Mark Twain, New York Times owner Arthur Hay Sulzberger, the atheist industrialist
Andrew Carnegie, and sexual revolution advocate Margaret Mead. The Lotos Club was the sort a place a Fundamentalist preacher
would ordinarily be ridiculed, yet somehow Scofield joined its rolls, even though the membership fee alone equaled one-fifth
of his salary as a pastor.11 He remained a member until his death in 1921.
Scofield’s Lotos Club admission was approved by the ultra-Zionist
attorney on the club’s Literary Committee, Samuel Untermyer. During his lifetime, Untermyer served as President of
Keren Hayesod (Zionism’s chief financial angel), played a major role in drafting the Federal Reserve Act, was notorious for blackmailing Woodrow Wilson into appointing Louis Brandeis to the Supreme Court, and spearheaded the Jewish “declaration of war” boycott against Germany in 1933. Is it surprising that someone who might be called America’s leading Zionist would sponsor,
at the Lotos Club, the theologian who produced the book which birthed “Christian Zionism”?
According to some sources (e.g., this article), Untermyer introduced Scofield to other leading Zionist financiers, such as Jacob Schiff and Bernard Baruch. This is credible,
since Untermyer was close to these individuals, and Scofield’s finances took a turn for the better—he was suddenly
able to afford extended trips to Europe in pursuit of producing his reference Bible.
Scofield and his wife Hettie traveled to England in 1904. According to
Charles Trumbull’s official, laudatory biography of Scofield, he told a London acquaintance, Robert Scott, that he
planned writing a reference Bible, but had no idea who might publish it. As luck would have it, Scott was able to introduce
him to Henry Frowde, head of Oxford University Press. Quoting Trumbull:
Mr. Frowde was interested. He said he would consult Mr. Armstrong,
then head of the American branch of the Oxford University Press. Mr. Armstrong was immediately enthusiastic at the suggestion
that this new Reference Bible be brought out by the Oxford Press, and a preliminary understanding was quickly reached. Mr.
Frowde assured Dr. Scofield that, if he finally decided to place the Bible with them, they could readily arrange a proper
contract for the publication, in the interests of each party. And so the publishing question was settled . . . . 12
This story is as preposterous as Scofield’s Lotos Club admission.
Major publishing houses don’t assure publication of manuscripts they haven’t even seen yet, unless the author
has a proven track record of bestsellers (e.g., a Stephen King). Scofield had never written a book before, with the exception
of Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth (which was actually self-described as a “pamphlet”). He had no
academic background qualifying him to edit a reference Bible.
Furthermore, Oxford University Press was owned by Zionist Jews and run by Fabian Socialists.
It was primarily devoted to publishing literary and scholarly books, not Bibles, and like the Lotos Club, was a
venue normally hostile to evangelical Fundamentalists.
It is rather apparent that Scofield’s Zionist connections, who got him into the Lotos Club and provided travel
funding, also arranged for Oxford’s up-front publication agreement. Is it only coincidence that Scofield’s trip
to England came on the heels of the Pope’s rejection (January 26, 1904) of Herzl’s plea to support a Zionist
state in Palestine? With the Catholics out, rallying Protestants had become imperative. Oxford University Press, with offices
on both sides of the Atlantic, could ensure Scofield’s work would receive the publicity and distribution the Zionists
When the Scofields
left England, they moved to Switzerland, where, according to Trumbull, Scofield did nine months of “solid work”
on his reference Bible. But why Switzerland? Although John Calvin’s library was there, it was not a very
logical place to research and write a reference Bible. It was, however, a center of Freemasonic and covert banking activities,
and, perhaps most importantly, where Theodor Herzl hosted the early Zionist congresses.
Scofield came back to America in 1905. In 1906 he returned to England (and
according to some sources, Switzerland again). In 1907, Scofield signed his publishing contract at the New York City office
of Oxford University Press, and his reference Bible was first published in January 1909.
One immediately notices the volume was produced with astonishing swiftness.
For most men, a reference Bible would have required a lifetime’s work. All the more remarkable: Scofield had no seminary
or university training, and was not formally schooled in the languages that ancient Biblical texts are written in—Greek,
Hebrew and Aramaic.
Scofield Bible’s Strategy
then, some of Scofield’s notes dictated to him by other parties? Even if not, reviewing the Bible makes it evident
that Scofield borrowed heavily from John Nelson Darby, James Brookes, and other early proponents of Plymouth Brethren-Dispensational
theology. Scofield would undoubtedly have preferred to use Darby’s satanic Bible version, or a Hort-Westcott modernized translation. But since the Zionists wanted to reach the largest cross-section of Fundamentalists, the King James
was employed. As James Whisler notes:
Cyrus wanted to use the bible of his heroes, Westcott and Hort, for this project. However, he knew that due
to the prominence of the KJV and the meager results of the Revised Version sales, that his dispensationalist teachings would
never get anywhere if coupled with the R.V. So he used the KJV, but he subtly showed his contempt for it and his reverence
for the Revised Version. This is how he did it. Everywhere that the King James disagreed with the Revised Version in an
area of doctrinal importance, Cyrus inserted a footnote stating the KJV was incorrect and he always offered a “more
correct” rendering which was almost always identical to the RV.13
Although his reference Bible was first published in 1909, that edition
is virtually impossible to find today. It was the revised 1917 edition that was hyper-marketed, with limitless advertising,
by Oxford University Press, selling millions of copies. Is it only coincidence that 1917 was also the year of the Balfour Declaration, by which Britain’s government pledged to Lord Walter Rothschild and the Zionist Federation to establish a “national
home” for the Jews in Palestine? The simultaneous mass-marketing of Scofield’s Bible would make it appear that
God himself had cosigned the Declaration, and “prophecy was being fulfilled” before believers’ eyes.
Why was Scofield’s work so effectual
at changing people’s understanding of the Bible? Before this, most commentaries were published separately from the
Scriptures themselves. Earlier expositors had regarded the Bible as the sacred Word of God, and that its text should not
be adulterated by their unworthy human words. Scofield scorned this tradition, placing his comments right on the Bible’s
pages. While this was done under the pretext of reader convenience, its subliminal impact was to give Scofield’s views
status competing with the Scriptures. When a reader recalled a specific Bible verse, he was apt to remember Scofield’s
words along with it, or even in its place.
Some were not fooled. As Philip Mauro commented in 1927:
It is a matter of grief to me that a book should exist wherein the corrupt words of mortal man are printed on
the same page with the holy Words of the living God; this mixture of the precious and the vile being made an article of
sale, entitled a “Bible,” and distinguished by a man’s name. . . . For the fact is that dispensationalism
is modernism. It is modernism, moreover, of a very pernicious sort, such that it must have a “Bible” of its own
for the propagation of its peculiar doctrines, since they are not in the Word of God.14
With Oxford’s intense marketing, people who simply wanted a Bible
often found themselves holding a Scofield Bible, and thus became unwitting recipients of “Scofieldism.” To help
ensure the Bible sold well, Oxford produced it in beautifully printed cloth and leather editions. To the unsuspecting, this
I know some will argue that Scofield’s notes include many theologically
sound remarks. Of course they do, because lies are far more effective when mingled with truths. The Bible warns us that “A
little yeast works through the whole batch of dough” (Galatians 5:9) and to “Beware of the yeast of the Pharisees
and Sadducees!” (Matthew 16:6). Scofield’s foremost mission was to harmonize his Bible with Zionism. Central
to this was distorting the promises God had made to Abraham (the ancestor of both the ancient Hebrews and Arabs) in Genesis
the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto
a land that I will shew thee: And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and
thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all
families of the earth be blessed.
Although the word “thee” is singular in the Hebrew,15 Scofield pulled a fast one,
made it plural, and applied the blessing to modern Jews. He wrote in his notes:
“And curse him that curseth thee.” Wonderfully
fulfilled in the history of the dispersion. It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew—well
with those who have protected him. The future will still more remarkably prove this principle.16
The Scofield Reference Bible was copyrighted by Oxford University Press,
not Scofield. This gave the publishing house license to change his words in subsequent printings. Oxford issued
a revised edition in 1967 (coinciding with the Six Day War and Israel’s seizure of Jerusalem). That version put Scofield’s
Zionism on steroids, adding, for example, this phrase to the above words: “For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism
brings inevitable judgement.” The Bible, of course, never refers to “the sin of anti-Semitism.”
In Genesis 15:18, God described the land
He was giving Abraham and his seed:
In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the
river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates.
At Herzl’s Zionist congresses, plans were made to claim all land from the Nile
to the Euphrates.
This demarks “Greater
Israel”; the Euphrates and Nile rivers are the two blue stripes displayed on the Israeli flag. They enclose a star
traditionally used in Satanism, with six points, six triangles, and a hexagon (six-sided) in the middle—666.
To convince Christians that Zionists remained entitled to this land, Scofield made God’s promise “unconditional.”
Abraham and his descendants it is evident that the Abrahamic Covenant made a great change. They became distinctively the
heirs of promise. That covenant is wholly gracious and unconditional. The descendants of Abraham had but to abide in their
own land to inherit every blessing.17
But as any Bible student knows—or should know—God’s promises to the Hebrews
were always conditional upon their faith. When Moses brought the Hebrews out of Egypt, God did not even permit them
to enter the land due to lack of faith. Instead, they were compelled to first wander in the wilderness for forty
years. Do you think today’s “Israelites” are more faithful to God than those of Moses’ days?
Tel Aviv’s 2016 Gay Pride Parade. Tel Aviv has been voted the world’s number one gay city. Look like Biblical holiness?
Anyone who believes God’s promises to Israel were “unconditional” should read Deuteronomy 28,
which clearly enumerates blessings for obedience, counterbalanced by curses for disobedience. What did John the Baptist
think about claims of “unconditional” heritage? He told the Pharisees: “And do not think you can say to
yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for
Abraham.” (Matthew 3:9). Jesus said: “Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and
given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.” (Matthew 21:43)
Scofield also made it appear that the Bible prophesied a future return of
the Jews to Palestine, in order to give the Balfour Declaration, and Israel’s eventual statehood, the illusion of “fulfilled
prophecies.” His notes proclaimed:
The gift of the land is modified by prophecies of three dispossessions and restorations . . . . Two dispossessions
and restorations have been accomplished. Israel is now in the third dispersion, from which she will be restored at the return
of the Lord as King under the Davidic Covenant.18
Scofield’s claim of three restorations is unscriptural. The Bible prophesies
only two restorations: the Hebrews’ original journey from Egypt to the Promised Land under Moses; and the return from
the exile in Babylon described in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah. To support his claim, Scofield used verses referring to
the Ezra-Nehemiah return, or to the coming of Christ, but nowhere does the Bible forecast a third return of the
Jews to Palestine, unless ones uses (as Scofield did) imaginative leaps of logic.
A cardinal rule of Scofield Dispensationalism: claim that if any Biblical
prophecy was not fulfilled in the past, it still awaits future fulfillment. Of God’s promise to give Abraham’s
seed the land from the Nile to the Euphrates, Scofield wrote: “It is important to see that the nation has never as
yet taken the land under the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant, nor has it ever possessed the whole land.”19
“Important,” Scofield? Important
to whom? Only to your Zionist masters. Although it is claimed that the conquests described in the book of Joshua did not
give the Hebrews the whole land, and thus left God’s promise to Abraham “unfulfilled” until the
future, a careful reading of the Bible disproves this. Joshua 21:43-45 declares:
And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he
sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein. And the Lord gave them rest round about, according
to all that he sware unto their fathers: and there stood not a man of all their enemies before them; the Lord delivered
all their enemies into their hand. There failed not ought of any good thing which the Lord had spoken unto the house of
Israel; all came to pass.
4:21 testifies that the Israelites ruled the entire area Herzl envisioned as “Greater Israel”:
And Solomon ruled over all the kingdoms from the Euphrates
River to the land of the Philistines, as far as the border of Egypt. These countries brought tribute and were Solomon’s
subjects all his life.
the Bible itself refutes Scofield’s claim that the promise was never fulfilled, allegedly justifying the modern Zionist
takeover of Palestine.
Scofield’s Legacy: The Damage that Has Been Done
Scofield’s Bible birthed “Christian Zionism,” and with it, untold
sorrows over the past century:
Cleansing of Palestine. In the 1948 Nakba, the Zionists murderously drove 750,000 Palestinians from their homes
at gunpoint. Quoting If Americans Knew:
Zionist forces committed 33 massacres and destroyed 531 Palestinian towns. Author Norman Finkelstein [himself
Jewish} states: “According to the former director of the Israeli army archives, ‘in almost every village occupied
by us during the War… acts were committed which are defined as war crimes, such as murders, massacres, and rapes’…Uri
Milstein, the authoritative Israeli military historian of the 1948 war, goes one step further, maintaining that ‘every
skirmish ended in a massacre of Arabs.’”20
Victims of 1948 Deir Yassin Massacre
ethnic cleansing of Palestinians has continued to this day.
Israeli settlers abuse a Palestinian
For those Christians who think the book of Joshua somehow still justifies
this, I wish to point out that the Canaanites whom Joshua and the Hebrews fought against were giants; satanically transhumanized
beings and worshippers of Satan. (See my article “Making Sense of the Supernatural.”) Today’s Palestinians do not equate to the ancient Canaanites, and contrary to what “Christian
Zionists” typically believe, many Palestinians are Christians.
Israel destroys a Gaza town, 2014:
Israelis celebrate their bombs:
Christian Zionists have bought into the myth that Israel is only “defending
its right to exist” and that Palestinians are “terrorists.” The Israelis have over 4,000 tanks and over
400 combat aircraft, thanks to a steady flow of about $3 billion annually from American taxpayers. The unarmed Palestinians
have not one tank or plane; they fight their illegal occupiers primarily with stones.
George W. Bush invaded Iraq
in 2003 on the pretext that it was avoiding UN inspections of weapons of mass destruction (which, it turned out, didn’t
even exist). Israel, on the other hand, has hundreds of nuclear weapons which it refuses to let the UN inspect; the United
States grants it a free pass, and has even given Israel the hydrogen bomb.
• False-flag Terrorism
and War for the Rest of the World. Contrary to the Zionist media’s spin, Israel has been the world’s number-one
sponsor of terrorism, implemented “by way of deception”—the motto of Mossad, Israel’s intelligence
service. This has included, for example, the 1946 King David Hotel bombing, the 1954 Lavon Affair, the vicious 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, the 1986 “Trojan” deception that led Reagan to bomb Libya (scroll down a little if clicking link), and of course, the mother of them all, 9/11, covered with Zionist-Israeli fingerprints. 9/11 led to the countless and unnecessary Middle East wars which were already foreknown in 2001. Those wars in turn produced the refugee crisis ravaging Europe today.
• Provoking Hostility of Muslims toward Christianity. Christian
Aid is a leading Christian charity and missionary organization, founded in 1945. Here is an informative 2003 quote from
Bob Finley, Christian Aid’s founder and CEO:
Christian support for the Zionist movement began in England a century ago when a few Bible teachers began to
interpret certain Old Testament prophecies regarding the ancient Hebrews as being applicable to the present day Jewish people.
Apparently those teachers did not know that (according to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia) the Ashkenazi, or Yiddish,
majority of Jewish people originally came from the empire of Khazaria in Southern Russia and are not biologically related
to Abraham. So when a few Ashkenazi Zionists began trying to take over parts of Palestine through acts of terrorism about
70 years ago, some Christians started saying it signified the fulfillment of some obscure Old Testament prophecies.
Christians today fail to realize how such statements have had a destructive effect on our fellow believers
in many parts of the world, so Christian Aid has begun to call attention to these facts. Since 1940 the Zionists have killed,
driven out or displaced over two million of the original residents of Palestine. Their lands, houses and businesses have
all been stolen, and most of their personal property as well. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled to refugee camps
in surrounding countries over a 20-year period. Yet all the while, unbelievably, some Christians in America were cheering
for the Zionists, and proclaiming their atrocities as being blessed of God. . . . Our thoughtless expressions of approval
have been destructive in three ways.
- What we have done to
our fellow Christians in Islamic Lands.
When Americans speak favorably about Zionist aggression in Palestine, we bring needless persecution
on multiplied thousands of our fellow believers now living in Islamic countries. Christian citizens of those countries are
suspected of being in agreement with what the Americans are saying, though not one in a thousand of them are. When Muslims
hear of Baptists in America praising Zionist atrocities, what are they to think of the Baptist churches in their countries?
Or the Pentecostals? Or Presbyterians? How can we expect them not to retaliate against those who favor killing their fellow
- What we have done to missionary work among the
years ago millions of Muslims were open to the gospel. There was a great missionary opportunity for reaching them for
Christ. Muslims make up the largest segment of unreached peoples on earth, and they were very open until American Christians
began to praise Zionist conquests in Palestine. Since most of the violence has been against Muslims, it is to be expected
that Muslims in other countries would be sympathetic toward the victims and resentful toward the Christians who support
Zionist expansion. This political development has served to cut off millions of Muslims from their previous receptivity to
the gospel. . . . Our missionary opportunity among them has been ruined.
What Zionism has done to our churches.
Until 50 years ago most
Christians accepted events recorded in the book of Joshua as something special for that particular time. We believed that
the coming of the Saviour brought a New Covenant under which we no longer resort to violence to advance the kingdom of God.
But when the Zionist movement began in Palestine around 1920, some Christians started to disregard New Testament principles.
We would say it’s wrong for us to kill our neighbor and steal his property, but if Jewish people did it in Palestine,
then it was O.K. First it was thousands, then tens of thousands, and eventually hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who
were driven from their homes. All of their property was stolen by the Zionists. Forty percent of the victims were professing
Christians, many of whom were born again believers. Yet, to our everlasting shame, many Christians in America have
stood on the sidelines and cheered for the murderers. It’s all O.K., we say, because Zionism is a fulfillment of prophecy.
It is hard to imagine how any Bible believer with reasonable intelligence could endorse such things, particularly when so
many thousands of conscientious Jews the world over have objected strenuously to Zionist aggression in Palestine.
Some of our faithful friends in Christ have told us that if we dare to say anything about the tragedies
that have resulted from Christians endorsing Zionist atrocities we may lose some financial support as a result. That doesn’t
bother me. My Bible says, “We must obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29)
Faithfully yours in Him,
Chairman and CEO21
I do wish to point out: the great majority of Christian Zionists have endorsed Zionism without conscious
knowledge of the atrocities in Palestine, which the U.S. media has suppressed. Most American evangelicals and dispensationalists
are good-hearted people, who have unfortunately been led astray about Israel.
Why So Many Christians Buy the Nonsense
Besides Scofield’s distortion of the Abrahamic covenant to mean an
“unconditional” real-estate promise to the Jews, and his invention of a third prophesied homecoming, the following
reasons stand out:
The “chosen people” myth. In keeping with Zionist preferences, Scofield ignored the New Testament’s
clear explanation: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female:
for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according
to the promise.” (Galatians 3:28-29). Scofield instead reverted the promise to an Old Testament context, a misinterpreted
one at that.
Moreover, we now
know that most people identifying as Jews are probably (as Finley noted above) not descendants of Abraham, but of the Khazars, a Turkic people who made Judaism their state religion in the eighth century AD. Jewish author Arthur Koestler pioneered
historical evidence for this in his 1976 book The Thirteenth Tribe, research since affirmed by DNA evidence. The significance? If most “Jewish” occupiers of Palestine aren’t Abraham’s descendants, then they
are not his seed, and thus not entitled to the land, even under the terms of Scofield’s twisted theology.
• The “Judeo-Christian”
myth. Most evangelical Christians harbor the illusion that religious Jews today are adherents of the Old Testament.
They believe they as Christians live in “Judeo-Christian” harmony with Jews who share the same essential values.
Of course, one cannot stereotype Jews, many
of whom (like my late father) are non-religious, have no interest in Zionism, and assimilate into other cultures. However,
when referring to organized Judaism, it is important to understand that religious Jews follow the Talmud, which
rabbis consider senior to the Tanakh (Old Testament of the Christian Bible). Jesus consistently directed his
most severe censures against the Pharisees, the teachers of the oral law, which they used to nullify the laws of
God. After the Romans destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD, dispersed Jews continued teaching the oral law, eventually written down
as the Talmud. Over the centuries it evolved, becoming many times more evil than in Jesus’s day.
The Talmud decrees that:
—Jesus is in hell, being boiled in feces; Gittin 57a.22
—Jesus’s mother Mary was a whore; Babylonian Talmud (BT), Sanhedrin
—Gentiles are donkeys; BT Berakoth 58a.24
—All gentile children are animals; Yebamoth 98a.25
—If a gentile hits a Jew, the gentile
must be killed; BT Sanhedrin 58b.26
who study the Law deserve death; BT Sanhedrin 59a.27
Jew may lie to a gentile; Tractate Baba Kamma 113a.28
Jew need not pay a gentile wages owed for work; BT Sanhedrin 57A.29
—It is permissible to cheat a gentile in court; BT Baba Kamma.30
—If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile, it does not have to be returned; BT Baba Kamma
—When the Messiah comes, he will destroy
the Christians; BT Sanhedrin 99a.32
It is not just ancient texts that disdain non-Jews, but modern rabbis as well.
—Rabbi Kook the Elder, first Ashkenazi chief rabbi of the British
Mandatory Palestine, said: “The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews—all of them in all
different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.”33
—Israeli Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said in
1994: “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”34
—In his 2003 book Jewish Superiority and the Question of Exile,
Rabbi Saadya Grama of Beth Medrash Govoha wrote: “The Jew by his source and his very essence is entirely good. The
goy, by his source and in his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but
rather of two completely different species.”35
—Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef said in a 2010 sermon:
Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they
have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow,
they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. . . . With gentiles, it will be like any person: They need to die,
but God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is
his servant. That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew.36
Talmudic Judaism is inherently racist, not rooted in Biblical values.
The behavior of Jews, not some sort of universal “anti-Semitism,” caused them to be expelled from more than 100 countries over the past two millennia. Martin Luther, well aware of their views and activities, denounced them.
Judaism regards non-Jews as
animals. This is why Israel’s heavily-armed IDF soldiers regularly abuse Palestinians as though they were not humans.
A booklet, written by the IDF’s chief rabbi and published by its Central Regional Command, indoctrinated soldiers with
Talmudic outlook in proclaiming:
When our forces come across civilians during a war or in hot pursuit or
in a raid, so long as there is no certainty that those civilians are incapable of harming our forces, then according to
the Halakhah [Jewish law] they may and even should be killed.37
The IDF’s new chief rabbi, Eyal Karim, has even said
IDF soldiers may rape Arab women to boost their morale.
regards Christians with contempt, and only tolerates them for the time being because they represent a powerful pro-Israel
voting bloc. The Jerusalem Post observed in 1983:
The real Zionists in the U.S. are not the American Jews but the Christian
evangelicals since these Christians feel that we are coming closer to a critical period in history and they want the Jews
to fulfill prophecies and thus hasten the Second Coming of the Messiah. The evangelicals affect 20 million people a day
in America. They are a great asset and must be used as such.38 [emphasis added]
Many Christians are duped into the illusion of “Judeo-Christianity”
because Israel permits American church groups to visit ancient holy sites in Israel. But as Jack Bernstein, an American
Jew who lived in Israel, wrote:
Tourism is one of Israel’s main sources of income. The largest group of visitors are American Jews. But,
there are also many American Christians who want to visit the holy shrines and to see the land of “God’s Chosen
People.” These Christians come away very impressed and filled with religious fervor.
While in Israel, Jews and Gentiles alike are carefully watched so that they do not stray and happen
to see the sordid side of Israel—the true Israel. Like in Soviet Russia and other communist countries, visitors to
Israel are taken on carefully planned guided tours. They are shown the religious sites, the universities, the lush orchards,
the technical accomplishments, the arts, and to stir sympathy, they are taken to visit the Holocaust Museum.
But, kept from the eyes of the tourists are the ghettos, the prisons where political prisoners, mostly
Arabs and Sephardic Jews, are subjected to the most inhumane forms of torture. The tourists do not see the widespread crime
activities and the corruption and cooperation between organized crime bosses and government and police officials. The tourists
do not learn of the true inner workings of Israel’s Marxist/Fascist government; nor do they see Israel’s racism.
I met one American tourist who couldn’t
help telling me about the wonderful religious feeling she had from being in Israel—the Holy Land. I remarked to her,
“Just try giving a Bible to a local Jew and you will see how much religion and religious freedom there is in Israel.
If seen by the police, you will be arrested.”39
Check out Israeli television mocking Christianity:
Zionism Degenerates into Complete Idiocy
Christian Zionists do not just fail to discern the Luciferian nature of Judaism; they treat Jews and Israel with veneration
bordering on idolatry. Texe Marrs highlights an example caught on film:
[F]ive or six young Christians, some eighteen to twenty years
of age, attending a national evangelical youth conference were asked, “How many of you love Israel?” All of their
hands shot straight up. “How many of you would fight and die for the nation of Israel?,” they were asked. Again,
every hand quickly went up. “And if Israel got into a war with the United States, how many would choose to go and
fight with Israel against your home country, the United States?” Once again, all (except one) raised their hand, though
not with quite so much enthusiasm.40
A church I once attended invited a “Messianic Jew” to deliver a Sunday sermon.
He told us it was very important for our church to show solidarity with the Jewish community. He announced that, to express
this solidarity, we would pretend we were a synagogue today, and celebrate Purim (the holiday on which Jews celebrate being
saved from their enemies—and slaughtering them). He distributed noisemakers to the congregation. As the rest
of the church played along, noisily acting out Purim, I stood in silence. I looked across the aisle at another parishioner
who felt as I did, and we shook our heads.
At the time, I was not yet schooled in Christian Zionism’s deplorable history. But I knew from the Bible’s
clear instructions (book of Hebrews) that we, as Christians, are not to engage in Jewish ceremonies. Furthermore, the alleged
purpose of the “pretend we’re a synagogue” service—to show solidarity to the Jewish community—made
no sense, as no synagogue Jews were present to witness the event. In retrospect, I believe the “Messianic Jew”
was simply trying to Judaize Christians, and for I all know, was snickering under his breath at the sight of us observing
Purim; for given the Talmud’s remarks about Christians, the church was ghoulishly celebrating what was tantamount to
its own funeral.
Brother Nathanael Kapner, who was Jewish-born-and-raised, and is now an Orthodox Christian, says this about Christian Zionists:
While some of Brother Nathanael’s
remarks may bore agnostics, and anger Christians with differing theological views, his comments on the Rapture and “Messianic
age” bring us to Zionism’s ultimate deception:
The Final Insult: Persuading Christians to Worship the Antichrist
There is nothing the Rothschilds would savor more than seeing the Christian
church bow down and worship the beast, or Antichrist, whom they wish to rule their coming world government. This necessitates
that when the Antichrist appears, he initially presents himself as the Second Coming of Christ.
When I was a young Christian, I was struck by a particular distinction
in Bible translations. Older versions, such as the King James and Geneva Bibles, always said Jesus would return at the end
of the “world” (e.g., Matthew 24:3). But modern versions (NIV, West-Horcott, Darby, etc.) said He would return
at the end of the “age.” In the Scofield Reference Bible, Scofield begrudgingly used the King James Version,
but always added notes clarifying that “world” was properly translated “age.”
This may seem only a nuance, but is vital
to the Zionists. Dispensationalism says history divides into seven “ages,” and that we are currently only in
the sixth. (These ages are artificial constructs; for a refutation, see this post by a former dispensational minister.)
By claiming Jesus shall return at the end of the current age, instead of the end of the world,
Scofield and his cohorts created a scenario by which the Antichrist could proclaim himself Christ, then rule
the Earth during the next “age,” through the very world government the Illuminati have been building.
Scofield wrote in his reference Bible: “Upon
His return the King will restore the Davidic monarchy in His own person, re-gather dispersed Israel, establish His power
over all the earth, and reign one thousand years.”41
But could Lucifer really arrive in a way that would persuade Christians he was Jesus?
Certainly. The apostle Paul, when describing false apostles, wrote: “And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed
into an angel of light.” (2 Corinthians 11:14). Can he appear to do miracles? The Bible says, “Even him, whose
coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders.” (2 Thessalonians 2:9). This would
be especially easy with the high tech now available, such as the capacity to project holograms, which can be fashioned in
the image of angels as easily as anything else.
As Emma Moore Weston notes:
Scofield teaching is concerned with a literal Jewish kingdom to last for a millennium. . . . The Bible does not teach it
. . . We must ask ourselves if Jesus ever offered or announced himself as an earthly King or claimed David’s throne?
Had he ever in any way suggested he was going to set up an earthly kingdom? He said to Pilate, “My kingdom is not
of this world, if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews,
but now is my kingdom not from hence.”42
The Israelites of Jesus’s day wanted a political Messiah, a king who would liberate
them from Rome. Jesus rejected it:
When Jesus therefore perceived that they would come and take him by force, to make him a king, he departed again
into a mountain himself alone. (John 6:15)
Scofield and “Christian Zionists” reject both the character of Jesus and the Bible’s clear teaching
by anticipating Him as an earthly king. They repeat the exact same error people in Israel made two thousand years
Most Christians today believe
that when they die, they will dwell in heaven with Jesus forever. But if Jesus is to rule on Earth for a thousand
years, while they were in heaven they would be separated from their Savior all that time. Yes, Scofieldism=confusion.
Many churches today affirm, in their “what
we believe” statements, that Jesus will return to rule Earth for a millennium. Yet only one passage in the entire
Bible refers to Jesus reigning a thousand years: Revelation 20:1-6. I think it dangerous for any church to base a core doctrine
on a single scripture passage, especially given the general consensus that the book of Revelation contains considerable symbolic
language. As this post is already very long, I won’t elaborate here on Revelation 20, but I refer the reader to Appendix
IV, “The Millennium,” of my book Truth Is a Lonely Warrior.
The Temple Trick
For a number of years, I attended a fundamentalist church. One day, the
associate pastor was teaching from the Old-Testament book of Ezekiel (in which God gave the prophet Ezekiel instructions
on the building of a temple). The teacher told us that, since Ezekiel’s temple was never built, it must be constructed
in the future, and that Jewish animal sacrifices would be restored. He said that after Jesus returned, he would
reign from this temple for 1,000 years.
I was amazed at this teaching, because the New Testament unequivocally declares that the Cross of Christ did away
with the temple and sacrifices. Much of the book of Hebrews is devoted to this point, telling us that “Jesus has become
the guarantor of a better covenant,” and that “Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices
day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when
he offered himself.” (Hebrews 7:22, 27)
The Book of Ezekiel, however, prescribed animal sacrifices:
Also one sheep is to be taken from every flock of two hundred from the well-watered pastures of Israel. These
will be used for the grain offerings, burnt offerings and fellowship offerings to make atonement for the people, declares
the sovereign Lord. (Ezekiel 45:15)
Jesus will not require us to make such offerings; the Cross eliminated them. The Book of Ezekiel further proclaims:
This is what the Sovereign Lord says: No foreigner
uncircumcised in heart and flesh is to enter my sanctuary, not even the foreigners who live among the Israelites. (Ezekiel
Would Jesus exclude
foreigners? The Bible says the Gospel is for all peoples. Would he reinstitute the Jewish custom of physical circumcision?
The Apostle Paul said:
Mark my words!
I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. Again I declare to
every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. You who are trying to be justified
by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace. (Galatians 5:2-4)
How had my church’s teacher become so blind to the Bible’s clear
message? I later found the answer when he proudly displayed his Scofield Reference Bible.
Although Christian Zionists say the Jewish temple must be rebuilt, Jesus
prophesied only its destruction:
“Do you see all these great buildings?” replied Jesus. “Not one stone here will be left on
another; every one will be thrown down.” (Mark 13:2)
Never did Jesus ordain the Temple’s rebuilding, or state that He would
rule from it. Here is what Jesus said about His return:
So if anyone tells you, “There he is, out in the desert,” do not go out; or, “Here he is,
in the inner rooms,” do not believe it. For as lightning that comes from east is visible in the west, so will be the
coming of the Son of Man. (Matthew 24:26-27)
Who will rule from a temple
in Jerusalem? The Antichrist. Jesus warned the End Times would occur “when you see the standing in the holy temple
the abomination that causes desolation, spoken of through the prophet Daniel.” (Matt 24:15). Paul, speaking of the
End Times, wrote:
anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed,
the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that
he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. (2 Thess 2:3-4)
Thus, Christian Zionists teach the opposite of Scripture and prepare
their congregations to worship the Antichrist himself. And make no mistake, Israel is preparing to rebuild the Temple, and to pay the costs gullible Christian congregations are being milked for donations, by some estimates up to $100 million
Why the Rapture Had to Be Taught
I now broach a subject guaranteed to incite fury, because it is so widely believed among evangelical churches. Darby
and Scofield expounded that Christians would not face the Antichrist’s persecution because the Rapture would
remove them from the planet. They thus asserted that Jesus would return twice: once for the Rapture, and later again
for His Second Coming. Here is the verse dispensationalists most heavily rely on for Rapture doctrine:
For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with
a cry of command, with the archangel’s call, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will
rise first; then we who are alive, who are left, shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in
the air; and so we shall always be with the Lord. (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17)
I will let Carl E. Olson elucidate:
There are three problems with claiming this passage refers to the Rapture.
First, neither it nor the entire book of 1 Thessalonians mentions Christ returning two more times, or makes any
reference to such a distinction. Second, dispensationalists believe the Rapture will be a secret and silent event, yet this
passage describes a very loud and public event. This is all the more problematic because dispensationalists insist that
they interpret Scripture “plainly” and “literally,” allowing for symbolism only when such is the
obvious intent of the author. Finally, dispensationalists teach that all other New Testament references to Christ coming
in the clouds (Matthew 24:30 and 26:64; Mark 14:62; Revelation 1:7) refer to His Second Coming but inexplicably deny that
that is the case here.44
Furthermore, Scripture plainly teaches that believers will not be “gathered unto the Lord” until
after the Antichrist has been revealed (excuse the following redundant quotation):
Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to
him . . . . Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the
man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and exalt himself over everything that is
called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. (2 Thess 2:1-4)
By believing they will be spared persecution, Christians are preparing
themselves for disappointment and even shattered faith. Fritz Springmeier relates:
Chinese believers in China prior to the Mao’s Red Chinese takeover
were told that they would be raptured before they suffered any tribulation. The communists took over and tortured and martyred
millions of Chinese Christians who mistakenly thought the Bible taught that they would be raptured before any suffering.
The Bible was widely discredited, because it had been mistaught.45
Why did the Illuminati want the Rapture doctrine introduced? It emasculated
the church as an opponent of the New World Order. Why fight something you won’t be around to experience?
Today, many Christians are perplexed as to why their congregations are
shrinking. The reasons, of course, are multidimensional, and include numerous factors outside the church itself, such as
inculcation of Darwinism in public schools, and Hollywood’s stereotyping of Christians as repugnant.
But much of the problem lies within the churches. Today, many truths about
world events are freely available through alternative media. When informed newcomers come to a Sunday service, and see that
a pastor, whose brain is hardwired to mainstream media, knows less about geopolitical truths than they do, will they trust
that pastor to edify them about eternal truths? When they hear a pastor praising Israel despite decades of atrocities,
and that the pastor thus excuses murder and theft, unable to distinguish fundamental right from wrong,
will they trust this pastor to lead them toward righteousness? And when see that a pastor cannot understand clear Bible
lessons, but instead teaches their opposite, based on regurgitation of Scofield’s Orwellian Scripture-twisting,
will they want to return for another sermon?
I think not.
Picture credit: David Dees, http://ddees.com/.
For Further Reading and Viewing
Marching to Zion
The Roots of Christian Zionism: How Scofield Sowed Seeds of Apostasy
“Seven Biblical Answers to Christian Zionism,” by Rev. Stephen Sizer
“Truth about the Talmud”
“Why I Left Scofieldism,” by Rev. William E. Cox
“The Folly of Dispensationalism,” by Dr. Allen M. Barber (former Dispensational minister)
Books available on Amazon:
The Incredible Scofield and His Book by Joseph M. Canfield
Judaism’s Strange Gods by Michael Hoffman (excellent resource for Christians on the Talmud)
Christian Zionism and the Scofield Reference Bible: A Critical Evaluation of Dispensational Theology by David Lance Dean
Holy Serpent of the Jews by Texe Marrs
Zion’s Christian Soldiers? by Rev. Stephen Sizer
1. John Coleman, How Conspirators Misuse Christian
Fundamentalists (white paper) (Carson City, Nev.: World in Review, 2003), 4.
2. As quoted, “C. I. Scofield:
Scoundrel, Shyster, and Scalawag,” Heresy in the Heartland, January 13, 2014, http://heresyintheheartland.blogspot.com/2014/01/c-i-scofield-scoundrel-shyster-and.html.
3. “Cyrus I. Schofield in the Role of a Congregational Minister,” Topeka Daily Capital, August
27, 1881, as quoted, Joseph M. Canfield, The Incredible Scofield and His Book (Vallecito, Calif.: Ross House Books,
4. Canfield, 80.
5. Ibid., 83.
6. Ibid., 94.
7. John S. Torell, “Dancing around
the Golden Calf, Part 5,” European-American Evangelistic Crusades, January-March 2007, http://www.eaec.org/newsletters/2007/Jan-Mar/NL2007Jan-Mar2.htm.
8. Canfield, 114.
9. Who’s Who in America (1912-1913), 1856, as quoted in Canfield, 290.
10. Canfield, 290.
11. Ibid., 218.
12. Charles Trumbull, The Life Story of C. I. Scofield (New York:
Oxford University Press, 1920), 89-90.
13. James Whisler, “Dispensationalism Timeline,” http://poweredbychrist.homestead.com/files/history/Timeline.htm.
14. Philip Mauro, The Gospel of the Kingdom (1927), http://www.preteristarchive.com/Books/1927_mauro_gospel-kingdom.html.
15. Thomas Williamson, “Zionism Verses the Bible,” http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Doctrines/Zionism/zionism.htm.
16. C. I. Scofield, ed., The Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1917), 25.
17. Ibid., 20.
18. Ibid., 25.
19. Ibid., 250.
20. “The Catastrophe, Al Nakba: How Palestine Became
Israel,“ If Americans Knew (April 2013), http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/ref-nakba.html.
21. Bob Finley, “Why Christian Aid Is Speaking Out about Zionism and Islam,” Christian News,
May 5, 2003, 13.
22. Michael Hoffman, “Jesus and the Talmud,” The Hoffman Wire (2003), http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wire1.html.
23. Michael Hoffman, Judaism’s Strange Gods (Coeur d’Alene, Idaho: Independent History and Research,
24. Ibid., 184.
25. Ibid., 196.
26. Ibid., 182.
27. Ibid., 185.
“Jesus and the Talmud.”
29. Hoffman, Judaism’s Strange Gods, 182.
30. Ibid., 185.
32. Ibid., 239.
33. Ibid., 189-90.
34. Clyde Haberman, “West Bank Massacre,”
New York Times, Feb. 28, 1994, http://www.nytimes.com/1994/02/28/world/west-bank-massacre-israel-orders-tough-measures-against-militant-settlers.html?pagewanted=all.
35. Hoffman, Judaism’s Strange Gods, 188.
36. Marcy Oster, “Sephardi Leader Yosef: Non-Jews
Exist to Serve Jews,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, October 18, 2010, http://www.jta.org/2010/10/18/news-opinion/israel-middle-east/sephardi-leader-yosef-non-jews-exist-to-serve-jews.
37. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years (London: Pluto Press,
38. Jerusalem Post, March 6, 1983, as quoted in Coleman, How Conspirators Misuse Christian Fundamentalists,
39. Jack Bernstein, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel (1985) (online edition), http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/israel.htm.
40. Texe Marrs, DNA Science and the Jewish Bloodline (Austin, Texas: RiverCrest Publishing, 2015), 165-66.
41. Scofield, 1227.
42. Emma Moore Weston, “Origin of Scofield Heresies,” Analyzing Scofield,
43. Stephen Sizer, “Will the Jewish Temple Be Rebuilt?” (February 27, 2014), http://stephensizer.com/2014/02/will-the-jewish-temple-be-rebuilt/#more-4966.
44. Carl E. Olson, “Five Myths about the Rapture,” November 2003, http://web.archive.org/web/20041217140003/http:/www.originaldissent.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-11538.html.
45. Fritz Springmeier,” The Armageddon Plot,” http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/armageddon_plot.htm.
Click on this text to watch Why Evangelical Christians Love Israel...
Jewish people collectively work as an army of bees. The Christians see one bee and think it is
not so dangerous and that it is better to avoid it. What the Christians can't understand is the danger of the tribe,
the group of bees, when they all work together to destroy one enemy.
Jews are the most coward, but the smartest
and most satanic people on earth. It is their nature and it is now a part of their
DNA. The proof is, everywhere in all Western countries of the world, ask any Jew what he thinks about immigration,
even Islamic immigration to the country where he is born; Most Jews favor "Open Societies" because they fear
a homogeneous people who can at any day open their eyes and recognize that there is a bacteria living with them.
It is why the Jews collectively favor Multicultural, Multi-racial societies where they can hide and be considered
as other "minorities" ruled by the "evil Whites". The Jew needs to hide because he hates the
White race and White civilization especially if it is Christian. The combination of Whiteness and Christianity
is a nightmare for the Jew. The religion of Christianity opposes the core of his Jewish religion based on lies,
hatred, subversion, supremacy, envy, violence. The White race as well, because the Jew knows which people is constructive,
productive and altruistic more than other groups. It is why the Jew promotes systematically and unconsciously
any movement and group of people who can weaken the White Christians.
He likes distraction, he brings those who hate his host so his host will hate those he brings instead of hating
him. The Jew is the corrosive power in every nation, he is the trigger that doesn't want people to have peace,
it is why he brings completely different people and force them to share the same country so they can fight instead
of fighting him. This is the description of "Trigger". This strategy allows him to rule Western people
who are busy hating all the races and religions that the Jew forces on them after preparing these foreigners to
hate their host.
The Jew is a coward, he never fight, he always gets some group to
fight for him, then gets other group to fight the group he was using. He is smart because his God is the Devil
according to Christianity and the Devil is smart, he is a fallen angel. It is why the Jew tried for centuries
to remove Christianity from the West, because he knows that if people apply Christianity, then they will ban the
Jews from their countries as it was the case in all Christian empires.
Jews recently admitted that they prefer Islamic Europe over Christian Europe, because they consider Christianity
"impure". A Rabbi even wrote an article celebrating the Islamization of Europe. They certainly know that
Islamization of Europe will lead to the greatest civil war in History, and it will cause the destruction of his
competitors: the Europeans. It is why in the last 6 decades he was siding with the "Muslim rights" in
in the West.
“lt is useless to deny … a great part of Europe the whole of Italy and
France, and a great portion of Germany, to say nothing of other countries are covered with a network of these secret
[JEWISH] societies, just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered with railroads. And what are their
objects? They do not attempt to conceal them. They do not want constitutional government. They do not want ameliorated
institutions; they do not want provincial councils nor the recording of votes; they want … an end to ecclesiastical
establishments …” ---Benjamin Disraeli (Twice The
Jewish Prime Minister of U.K. 27 February 1868 – 1 December 1868 / 20 February 1874 –
21 April 1880)
"All you pious Christians who think you can go to heaven while supporting a government that has become the
hired killer doing the dirty work of homicidal Jewish tyrants should be excluded from serious conversations about
anything, for it is your delusion that you could support Israel which has created this hell on Earth and still
go to heaven when you die. God knows there is no chance of that happening."
[One of my most faithful South African supporters in the "diaspora" sent me this. Here are his remarks:
This is rich coming from the 'chosen'... If any holy books
need censoring, the talmud and torah will be at the top of the list. Jews don't seem to realise that anti-semitism is
a result of their behaviour.... Just as Apartheid was implemented as a result of 'black' behaviour.
What my supporter says
is true. If you want to get rid of RACISM, then start with the Talmud, and also BAN JUDAISM FROM BEING PRACTISED IN ANY
COUNTRY! The root of Jewish hatred of whites (Loxism), is created by the Rabbinical scum who are busy in every country where
the Jews live! BAN JUDAISM!
BAN THE TALMUD! BAN RABBIS! Then you'll get rid of LOTS of JEWISH RACISM and also the hideous Jewish cruelty
Here, yet again, we see clearly that Jews are NOT the freaking "victims" they continually claim
they are. Instead, Jews are offered opportunities and truly SPECIAL JEWISH PRIVILEGES that NO GROUP OR RACE ON EARTH EVEN
COMES CLOSE TO GETTING!!!
The more I study history and these Jewish scum, the more convinced I am that everyone,
I mean EVERYONE, of EVERY RACE, EVERYWHERE ON EARTH, treats Jews FAR FAR BETTER than this race of pure scum deserve. Everyone
bends over backwards for this race of lying, ambitious, back-stabbing filth. They are accorded privileges, especially in
WHITE SOCIETY, in Europe, the USA, the UK, beyond imagination.
So the Jewish scum now want to insert their words into the
Bible and the Koran!
When I did a video about how the Jews infiltrated the Vatican and changed the Roman Catholic
Church, you would have noticed that the JEWS, yes, the JEWS, were getting the opportunity by the Vatican to actually read
and CENSOR Roman Catholic writings about the JEWS! Yes, Jews were telling the Vatican what they can and cannot publish about
Now we see the Jews, boldly sticking their noses into Christianity and Islam. Soon they will be
telling Christians and Muslims how to behave. Heck, the other day I posted an article about how the CIA is being changed!
We are at the epitome of sheer madness, where Jews anywhere on the planet can do anything the hell they please in any country
in any way. Jews can have British thrown in jails, they can have Germans thrown in jails ... in fact this happens across
I honestly don't know how much more is left that Jews do NOT have a say in? It seems they run or
can get involved in, ALMOST ANYTHING, ANYWHERE? They had 255 technical holocaust books removed from Amazon! They've had
whites thrown off Facebook, Twitter, Gab and every other social media.
Jews did 911 and sent America, Britain
and even European troops to go and kill Muslims by the million!!!
Is there ANYTHING LEFT FOR WHITES? Is there ANY FREEDOM LEFT
FOR CHRISTIANS OR MUSLIMS?
The problem is NOT the whites, NOT the "racists", NOT the "NAZIS",
NOT the Christians, NOT the Muslims ... the problem is Super-duper Jewish privilege to every corner and inch of this planet!
THAT'S THE PROBLEM! Jan]
Jewish leaders call for new editions of the Bible
and the Koran to carry trigger warnings highlighting anti-Semitic passages
- A Catalogue of Policies to Combat Antisemitism outlines numerous suggestions
- It was produced after a conference organised by the European Jewish Congress
- The conference
discussed anti-Semitism online and in various religious texts
- Leaders met earlier this week in Vienna to discuss the new policy suggestions
Jewish leaders are calling for new editions of the Bible and Koran to carry warning messages which highlight anti-Semitic
passages in the holy texts.
The recommendations have been made in a new document called ‘An End to Antisemitism! A Catalogue of
Policies to Combat Antisemitism’.
It was produced following an international conference organised by the European Jewish Congress, at which academics
gathered to discuss how prejudice and discrimination can be tackled.
Ariel Muzicant, Vice-President of the European Jewish
Congress, and co-author of the new document holds it up, showing the title 'An End to Antisemitism! A Catalogue of Policies
to Combat Antisemitism'
Among the policies mentioned in the document was the idea of warning messages in holy texts,
a topic discussed in a chapter entitled 'recommendations regarding Religious Groups and Institutions'.
The document reads: 'Translations of the New Testament, the Qur’an and other Christian
or Muslim literatures need marginal glosses, and introductions that emphasize continuity with Jewish heritage of both Christianity
and Islam and warn readers about antisemitic passages in them.
'While some efforts have been made in this direction in the case of Christianity, these efforts
need to be extended and made consistent in both religions.'
These include the blame of Jews for the death of Jesus and the seemingly stubborn nature of
the Jewish people and their disloyalty to God.
While there are some negative remarks about Jews in the Koran, and negative portrayals of the
The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has previously spoken of how religious texts can
be exploited or misinterpreted to promote discriminatory attitudes.
Academics and leaders gathered in Vienna earlier this year to discuss how an end to anti-Semitism
can be brough about. Pictured here (left to right) are Ariel Muzicant, Vice-President of the European Jewish Congress,
Heinz Fassmann, Federal Minister for Education, Science and Research, Mathias Doepfner, CEO Axel Springer SE, Danielle Spera,
Director of the Jewish Museum Vienna, Kenneth Jacobson, Deputy National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, Pawlo Klimklin,
Minister for Foreign Affairs of Ukraine and Dina Porat, Head of the Kantor Centre
Writing in a collection of essays published in 2016, he said: 'It is a shameful truth that,
through its theological teachings, the church, which should have offered an antidote, compounded the spread of this virus.
'The fact that anti-Semitism has infected the body of the Church is something of which we
as Christians must be deeply repentant. We live with the consequences of our history of denial and complicity.'
The document, which was produced by academics including Dina Porat and Lawrence H. Schiffman,
also calls on all antisemitic texts and passages in the heritage of Christianity and Islam 'to be identified and rejected'.
Other recommendations include religious leaders and thinkers 'publicly denouncing as
unholy writ' canonical or quasi-canonical writings of religious anti-Semites.
The justification for these changes, the documents states, is because divine messages are
always communicated through human beings and therefore subject to error.
It reads: 'God’s revelation is thus marred by human fallibility. Beginning with the
New Testament, divine revelation expresses itself in Christian holy texts that also express a form of hatred.
'The manifestations of this hatred resulted in a tradition of antisemitism that gave moral
legitimacy to crimes against the Jewish people, the epitome of which is the Shoah.'
Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, Moshe Kantor,
President of the European Jewish Congress, and Manfred Weber, Chairman of the European People's Party, are pictured during
a conference on anti-Semitism in Vienna, Austria. The conference followed the publication of a document outlining a number
of policy suggestions
Once the 'antisemitic contents of a religious memory are identified' religious leaders and
followers need to be told, the document concludes.
Other areas highlighted, following the conference, include addressing anti-Semitism online
and within research organisations and academic institutions.
This includes ensuring internet search engines privilege positive depictions of Judaism and
accurate descriptions of the history of anti-Semitism.
Academics have been reacting to suggested recommendations laid out in the documents.
Dr Christine Joynes, a theology lecturer at Oxford, told The Times that she had 'some sympathy'
over the suggestion of an annotated bible.
But said: 'The whole Bible needs a health warning to read it through the right critical lens
and in historical context.'
While Muhammad Abdel Haleem, professor of Islamic Studies at the University of London,
and also speaking to The Times said that the Koran is entirely negative towards Jews.
He said: 'If someone wants to get involved in antisemitism or anti-Islamic behaviour, they
will do it whether or not you add warnings and footnotes.'
Click on this text to watch "When Will Christian Zionists Denounce Israels Embrace of Homosexuality"...
Quoting from editions of the Jewish Encyclopedia, this author demonstrates some 95% of modern Jews
are in fact non-Semitic Gentiles.
Introduction. The Jews are the only people in the
world who have found hostility in every country in which they settled in any numbers. The big question is—WHY ...
The New York Kehillah is the largest and most powerful union
of Jews in the world, the center of Jewish world power has been transferred to that city. That is the ...
"Such a desperate, thoroughly evil, poisonous and devilish
lot are these Jews, who for these fourteen hundred years have been and still are our plague, our ...
Historic proof most Jews are not Abraham's seed or
Louis D. Brandies, Justice if the Supreme Court of the United
States -- "Let us all recognize that we Jews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever ...
The story of the Jews in America begins with Christopher
Columbus. On August 2, 1492, more than 300,000 Jews were expelled from Spain and on August 3, ...
There is a true Church, and there is a FALSE Christian church,
but it is not generally known that there are true Jews and FALSE Jews. As genuine Christians are ...
THE INTERNATIONAL JEW. CONTENTS. Foreword. Editor's
Foreword. The Man. Henry Ford -- The Man. Chapter 1. Jewish History in the United States.
Documentation by a Jewish insider of the beliefs and behavior of his fellow Jews
and their hatred for the goyim on whom they depend for economic, military, and ...
“If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not
known and do the evil there”
— Moed Kattan
Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews. When a Jew murders a Gentile (“Cuthean”), there will
be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep.
“Jews are Divine. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, the Gentile must be
killed. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God”
foundation of the new Holocaust religion, the holy 6 million? Choose your own biggest whopper: http://balder.org/judea/Six-Million-140-Occurrences-Of-The-Word-Holocaust-And-The-Number-6,000,000-Before-The-Nuremberg-Trials-Began.php
Today, America is dying of a venereal disease of the spirit
called Jewish morality, spread throughout the population by a nonstop onslaught of perverse propaganda from Jewish owned
media aimed at destroying all families and making everyone depend on the all-powerful arms of the state.
This is called Communism, which according to the famous rabbi Moses Hess, is
another term for Judaism. So if you have any interest in the people who are now running society, consider one of the things
these so-called humans believe?
are Sub-Human. All Gentile children are animals.
The #3 largest TV broadcasting network in America is Trinity
of Garden Grove, California. It was founded by
shyster-for-God guy, Paul
Crouch (died 2013), and his laughably
ridiculous looking ex-wife Jan (died
in 2017). See photo
of her below to get an idea of my idea of ridiculous.
You would imagine that Trinity would be the exclusive
domain of your typical
pseudo-Christian TV money
hucksters, but no... There are Jewish fingerprints all over
and Jewish money evidently flows
like wine into Trinity’s bank account. Just have a look at
daily programming; such as on Monday,
March 11 th , 2013:
2:00 AM – Israel, A Journey Through Time with Rev.
Dr. John Tweedie
5:45 AM – Supernatural with Sid Roth (Jew)
10:30 AM – Jewish Voice with Jonathan Bernis (Jew)
1:30 PM –
The Jewish Jesus with Rabbi Kirt Schneider
PM – Live From the Holy Land (Israel)
So we have Jewish propaganda
between multi-millionaire Evangelist hustlers all crowing
of Israel and the Jewish people all day.
Trinity has evangelist hustlers such as the ever-smirking
Osteen and his employee Israel Houghton (who
rocks out for Jesus), jet setter Joyce Meyer (who has her
jet), Benny Hinn (born in Israel), Texas cattle baron
Kenneth Copeland, and uber-Israel supporter John Hagee
all touting the “godliness” of the Holy Land, aka: Israel.
These evangelical imbecilic fools actually believe that
Jews will renounce Judaism and all become Christians
once Jesus returns. This is a concept that Jews find
laughably insulting. Evangelicals raise millions of dollars
a year by fleecing their flocks and sending some of the
money to Israel for Israeli causes. The Israelis take
money from the useful idiots but are ever wary
of the obligatory
An hour doesn’t go by without Trinity reminding
flock of sheeple watching that Jesus isn’t coming back
until Israel has been firmly established, is safe,
secure. And if Jesus is indeed “returning,” I doubt that he
would be concerned with the security
of a nation that
despises him and the religious institutions that he
inspired into existence in the first
PM you can watch Live From the Holy Land.
The Holy Land Experience
is a Christian theme park near
Disney World in Orlando, Florida that opened on
February 5 th , 2001. This
quote can be found at the Holy
Land Experience website:
“The Holy Land Experience
was born in the heart of a Jewish believer named
...I have no doubt whatsoever that Marvin’s
only idea was to fleece the sheeple who would flock to
his synthetic “holy land” and he only believes in a good
scam when he sees it.
In summation, Trinity Broadcasting is still wholly owned by the
the controllers are people working
diligently on the Judeo-Christian agenda of global
Son Matt Crouch is being royally compensated
renting out his network...
It’s a fair estimate that
90% of American television
networks are owned and/ or controlled by Jews. One of
the repulsive things about
Zionist control of media is the
many semi-pornographic references to sodomy, fellatio,
masturbation, bondage, multiple
sex partners, whore mongering and other perversely
that are referred to at dinner
time during the course of many “situation-comedy” TV
Two and a Half Men and The Exes are the best, or
worst, examples of what I’m talking about.
Click on this text to see how ridiculous TV Evangelism can be...
Click on this text to watch THE TRAITORS AMONG US...
Click on this text to waych... Zionism: Deconstructing the Power Paradigm with Kevin Barrett, Alan Sabrosky and Gilad Atzmon....
"In the religious sphere the profession of denominational
belief is largely the result of education, while the religious yearning itself slumbers in the soul." ...Anon.
Click on this text to hear Brother Kapner discuss the Moral Rot Of Zionist Christians....
The 100 Year-Old Duping of American Evangelical Christianity –
The followers of Christ have been fooled into believing the Bible teaches something it does
not teach: Christian support of Israel. Israel is, in fact: antichrist, because Israel denies both the Father and the Son.“Who
is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist–he denies the Father
and the Son.” (1 John 2:22).
Walk into any Christian
bookstore in America and you will see how virtually everyone who calls themselves a follower of Jesus Christ in this
nation has been tricked into believing a false theology, which leads them to believe, erroneously, that the Bible commands
them to support the Jewish nation of Israel.
The driving force behind this error was the 1909 Scofield Reference Bible, which was the first
Bible printed by Oxford University Press that included theological reference notes that guide the reader as to how to “properly”
understand, or interpret, the biblical text.
It’s no coincidence that the rise of Zionism,
that is: the impulse of the Jews to seek a homeland for themselves, began not long before the Scofield Reference Bible was
published. In the late 1800’s, England is where Zionism first found political support. England was already awash with
the erroneous “Christian” doctrine of British-Israelism, wherein the British Christians were taught that they
were one of the lost tribes of Israel; therefore they should support the Zionist Jews venture to create a Jewish state:
the advent of World War I, England began the push to create a Zionist homeland for the Jews in Palestine. This served two
functions: it would ensure safe passage through the Suez Canal and trade with India; and it would placate the Zionist Jews
and the British Christians who, due to British-Israelism, had been fooled into thinking they should support Zionist Jews
in obedience to God and the Bible.
Fast forward 100 years and we find that American Evangelical Christians have, long ago, been
fooled into believing they should support Jewish Zionism, because they mistakenly believe the Bible teaches this, and that
God will curse them and America if they/we don’t. Thus we have never-ending support from the American Evangelical
Christian Right for endless wars on behalf of Israel.
This duping of American Evangelical Christians is mostly due to the fact that
the Scofield Reference Bible and its footnotes, which explains the biblical text in a way that convinces its unsuspecting
readers to support Zionist Jews. Its complimentary theology: Dispensationalism, has been instrumental in influencing American
Evangelical Christians to support Israel, because the theology of Dispensationalism has been pervasive throughout virtually
every American Evangelical Bible school and theological seminary for the past 100 years.
This erroneous doctrine, Dispensationalism, has resulted in the Judaizing of
American Evangelical Christianity and has been successful in converting Evangelical Christian Americans into Christian Zionists,
who are not following the teachings of Jesus Christ, the New Testament, or traditional orthodox Christianity at all. In
fact, these millions of well-meaning people have adopted a false theology, based upon a twisting of and a re-interpretation
of the Scriptures and have become a part of America’s largest and most influential non-Christian, even anti-Christian,
“Judeo-Christianity is less than 200 years old. The Jewish Zionism movement has played the key part in assuring
its growth. We see the result in the creation of a new “Christianity” which in its extreme form is known
as Christian Zionism. It was first fed by Oxford University Press’s Scofield Reference Bible published in New York
in 1908, and updated several times. Bible editors, including Oxford, have failed to correct obvious changes in common usage
of words, such as “Jew” and “Israel” that provide misleading, Zionist friendly inferences.”
a new 20th Century theology to evangelical seminaries. The Scofield usage has become a standard in most study or reference
Bibles used by a wide range of evangelicals, and even penetrating into mainline church bible studies and broadcast media.
These books are the subject of many articles by this author and others.” (See: http://www.whtt.org/show/) Source:
It should not come as a surprise to any Bible-believing Christian that false teachings and
false teachers will use the Bible to convince well-meaning believers to believe a lie rather than the truth, because the
Bible itself, through St. Paul, warns us of this danger:
“For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, masquerading as
apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his
servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve.” (2nd Corinthians
Judaized Christians, or Christian Zionists, are fond of turning the discipline of Bible study
on its head by allowing the Old Testament to interpret and to clarify the New Testament when, in fact, the proper method
of Christian Bible study is to do the opposite: allow the New Testament to shed light on and interpret the Old Testament.
Thus these “Christians”, rather than following the teachings and example of Jesus Christ, which is found in
the New Testament, will force the words of Christ and the Christian New Testament to comply with the Old Testament, especially
Whereas Jesus himself cursed Israel and proclaimed its soon abandonment by God, in Matthew 23, especially verse 38,
as well as its destruction at the hands of the Roman armies (see Luke 21:20) within the lifetimes of those who heard his words (see Matt. 24:34), Judaized Christians, or Christian Zionists will appeal to the teachings of the Old Testament, especially Genesis 12:3, in direct contradiction to the teachings of Jesus Christ found in the New Testament, and they will insist that all Christians
must support and bless Israel in order to be faithful to God and the Bible. Yet nothing could be further from the truth.
and hermeneutical error has led millions of so-called Christians to support war rather than peace, and the merciless killings
of millions of people in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Palestine. Rather than being peacemakers, as Christ commanded his followers
to be (see Matt. 5: 9) these Christian Zionists have, instead, adopted the Old Testament principle of waging war upon the enemies of Israel,
at America’s expense (e.g., lives, broken bodies, and tax monies).
Those who claim to be Christians but who do not follow Christ in love
lie and do not have the truth: “We know that we have come to know him if we obey his commands. The man who says, “I
know him,” but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But if anyone obeys his word,
God’s love is truly made complete in him. This is how we know we are in him: Whoever claims to live in him must walk
as Jesus did.” (1 John 2: 3-6).
writes: The Incredible Scofield and His Book by Joseph M. Canfield (1988) provides a thoroughly documented account
of how Zionist banksters sponsored a wolf in shepherd’s clothing to deceive the evangelical church. Scofield’s
distortions of scripture have been exposed and corrected by Robert Van Kampen, Marvin Rosenthal, H. L. Nigro, Joseph Lenard
and Donald Zoller, and many others. But truth is suppressed when the big money, power and prestige goes to those who repeat
from Jim Perloff:
bad enough that many mainstream denominations have adopted Rockefeller-financed Modernism (rejecting the authority of their
own Bible, rejecting the divinity & miracles of Jesus, going pro-gay/abortion, etc). If one is fortunate enough
to find a church that is still theologically conservative, even most of THESE have been duped into embracing the “Christian
Zionism” which Mr. MacDonald so accurately describes.
I have found that a good many 9-11 Truthers reject Christianity.
One reason is the Pavlovian flag-waving of Christian pastors who throw their support behind war after war that is slaughtering
the people of the Middle East. These pastors have abandoned the love of Christ for a revived book of Joshua, believing it
is their “Christian duty” to support the Zionists’ bloody conquest of Palestine. They IGNORE that Zionism
was financed by the Rothschilds (who also financed Communism, which exterminated Christians by the million). They IGNORE
that most calling themselves Jews today are descended from Khazaria, NOT Abraham, and have no conceivable “Biblical”
claim to the land whatsoever.
Jesus Christ said he came to tell us TRUTH. The church should therefore be in the
forefront of the Truth Movement. Instead it has swallowed a cyanide pill of lies, committing suicide as it cuts off any
hope of meaningful dialogue with both Truthers and Muslims worldwide.
Cyrus Scofield was a member of New York’s exclusive Lotos
Club, where he met Samuel Untermeyer and other powerful Zionists. They financed his trips to England, where Oxford University
Press agreed IN ADVANCE to publish his proposed Bible, which he spent months working on in Switzerland – an unlikely
place to research a Bible commentary, but long the nerve center of Masonic, banking and revolutionary activity. An
excellent reference on Scofield is Joseph Canfield’s THE INCREDIBLE SCOFIELD AND HIS BOOK.
The Jews have completely hijacked
Evangelical Christianity since the halcyon days of Billy Graham though TV evangelicals who sell their souls to the beast...
From 1789 to 1989 the
first 200 years of the American Constitution it was perfectly legal and very loved by Americans to have Christian and Christmas
Cultural Icons on public ground as part of our American fabric. Even the date of our Constitution was signed by its authors with
the preface: “In the Year of our Lord.”
In 1989 it became illegal to
have any Christian-themed Christmas display on any Federal, State, County or City ground. It became illegal to say any prayers
in schools, forbidden to even sing Christmas Carols in them or even call the Christmas holidays, “Christmas Holidays!”
In the height of chutzpah, the
same Supreme Court decision that outlawed any Christian Symbol because it was religious – decreed that the oldest symbol
of the Jewish Religion, the
Menorah, even huge, monster
Menorahs could be put up on public ground.
So 80 percent of the American people are denied their religious and cultural heritage while less that two percent
of the population get’s their religious symbols erected on any public space.
Where Christian motifs once stood in front of the White House and city halls, giant Jewish Menorahs
became perfectly legal along Rabbis lighting it in Jewish rituals celebrating Jewish dedication to the preservation of their
race, religion and culture in a ritual that DENIES OUR HERITAGE RELIGION AND CULTURE.
You can thank a JEW.
Christianity as the enabler for Judaic world domination and quite possibly for the end of the world...
The Confused World
Paul And Jan Crouch
by Joseph Chambers
If there is one thing certain about Paul and Jan Crouch, it is that
nothing is certain. Whether the guest of Trinity Broadcast Network is a religious leader that is fairly fundamental in doctrine
or a way out person that says almost nothing that makes sense, they both are welcomed and applauded as great. For one hour
of the "Praise The Lord" show you may hear someone trusted by much of the church world and then the next hour hear
the babble of Kim Clement. Theology or truth is just not important. It is religious entertainment.
In fact, Paul Crouch calls theology "doo-doo". On a Praise
The Lord telecast he shouted, "Let Him (God) sort out all this doctrinal doo-doo, I don’t care about it."
He apparently hates no one worse than those he calls "heresy hunters". On another occasion he spoke to his worldwide
audience by stating, "Heretic hunters, those guys who spend their lives straightening us all out doctrinally, they are
going to go straight to hell." (You could hear Jan laughing approvingly on the set.) Here are a man and woman that controls
the message about the Word of God and the airing of the messages of the most noted televangelists to the greatest single audience
in the world and they hate correction and biblical reproof. It is a formula for spiritual disaster and that is what is already
Here are three additional
statements that show Paul’s disdain for anyone that dares to question the messages of his guests on Trinity Broadcast
Transcribed From Trinity Broadcasting Network’s Praise The Lord Show:
"I refuse to argue any longer with any of you out
there. Don’t even call me if you want to argue doctrine, if you want to straighten somebody out over here, if you want
to criticize Kenneth Copeland for his preaching on faith of Dad Hagin, get out of my life. I don’t ever want to talk
to you or hear, I don’t want to see your ugly face."
"I think they are damned and on their way to hell and I don’t think there is any redemption for them.
I say, ‘to hell with you’."
"I say, ‘Get
out of God’s way, quit blocking God’s bridges (Apparently, he defines God’s bridges as the One World Church
and ecumenism.); or God is going to shoot you if I don’t.’"
What Does Paul And Jan Really Believe?
Either they do not know what they believe or
they do not care. Their guests represent some of the wildest possible heresy that can be exposed. Two of their newest stars/idols
are Phil Munsey and Kim Clement. The mainstays of the last five to twenty years are well-known televangelists that continually
teach questionable doctrines that have already destroyed a multitude of believers. I want to simply give you quotes from TBN
telecasts and their guests and then show those quotes in the light of clear biblical truth. The picture that will emerge will
represent some of the absolute darkest heresy available in the church world. The problem is that these people, whose actual
words you will read, are not called cultic. They operate in the supposedly sane world of true Christianity. You must let God’s
Word help you decide. Your spiritual life is absolutely at stake.
The "Force Of Faith" Vs. The "Faith Of Our Fathers"
Nothing we discuss in this article is more important than this definition
of faith. God is either the Sovereign and Eternal God that has revealed Himself in His book of faith (The Holy Bible) or He
is a pagan god that operates much like Kenneth Hagin, Kenneth Copeland, Benny Hinn, Paul Crouch, etc. Listen carefully to
this explanation of faith.
Transcribed From Trinity Broadcasting Network’s Praise The Lord Show:
Kenneth Copeland: "The force of faith is in
the spiritual realm a great deal like certain forces in the natural realm. It is a spiritual force, like gravity is a natural
force, and electricity is a natural force of power."
Paul Crouch: "A measurable natural force."
Kenneth Copeland: "It’s a
measurable force, it’s conductible, it’s perceptible to the touch . . . Faith is a spiritual force, it’s
perceptible, . . . it is a tangible force, it’s an invisible force, so is gravity, but it is there."
Paul Crouch: "So is electricity
. . . Does God use faith?"
Paul Crouch: ". . . See, here is the sore spot. There are
those who say . . ."
Crouch: "Not with him." (speaking of Copeland)
Paul Crouch: "Not with you." (lots of
Jan Crouch: "Not with God."
Copeland: ". . . the fact. No, I’m not sore at God at all and I don’t think
He’s sore at me . . . I haven’t done anything to Him."
Paul Crouch: ". . . The critics say God is
God, He doesn’t have to have faith; He doesn’t exercise faith. He doesn’t use faith. He’s God. He’s
the object of faith."
Copeland: " . . . Wait a minute, what does that mean? Object of faith. I don’t know
what that means."
Crouch: "I don’t either."
What Does The Bible Say About Faith?
The definition of biblical faith has no kinship to this "Force of Faith"
espoused by Copeland, and apparently Paul and Jan Crouch. In the above statement by Kenneth Copeland, God is said to use faith
just like Copeland uses faith. Faith ceases to be the lofty and eternal truth forever settled in the Heavens and established
by an eternal God that is Himself the object of our faith. It becomes a formula or a New Age force that is a pagan idea, clearly
kin to the many teachings of the occult.
new religion of the Antichrist is said to be a religion of "forces". Daniel prophesied this clear warning, "But
in his estate shall he honor the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honor with gold, and silver,
and with precious stones, and pleasant things." (Daniel 11:38)
To even suggest faith as a "force" is to deny God as an eternal being
to whom we turn in truth and faith for all our sufficiency. It actually reduces God to the level of man. Real faith is clearly
seen in Apostle Paul’s beautiful description to the Hebrews. Listen to his biblical statement of faith, "Now faith
is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." "Through faith we understand that the worlds
were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear." "But without
faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them
that diligently seek him." (Hebrews 11:1,3,6). In true faith God becomes the "Absolute, the Eternal Sovereign God"
in whom we rest all our hopes.
Biggest Failure In The Bible
you join together the idea of faith as a "force" with a God that became the biggest failure in the universe, you
are laying the foundation for a "pagan cult" or a "paranormal religion". Here is another example of a
TBN telecast where biblical doctrines are cast to the wind.
Transcribed From Trinity Broadcasting Network’s Praise
The Lord Show:
Copeland: "I was shocked when I found out who the biggest failure in the Bible actually
Paul Crouch: "Okay."
Copeland: "You know everybody you ask, you say, ‘Who’s the biggest failure?’
They say, ‘Judas.’ Somebody else will say, ‘No, I believe it was Adam.’ Well, how about the devil?"
Paul Crouch: (Sound of amazement.)
Kenneth Copeland: "He’s the
most consistent failure . . . but he’s not the biggest in terms of material failure and so forth. The biggest in the
whole Bible is God. . . . Wait, wait. Don’t you turn that set off. You listen to us. I told you. . . . Now, you sit
still a minute. You know me well enough to know I wouldn’t tell something I can’t prove by the Bible.
"He lost His top ranking of most anointed angel, the first man
He ever created, the first woman He ever created, the whole earth and all the fullness therein, a third of the angels at least.
That’s a big loss, man! I mean you figure up all of that, that’s a lot of real estate, gone down the drain.
"Now, the reason you don’t think of God as a failure,
He never said He’s a failure. (Paul Crouch and others laughing on the set.) And you are not a failure until you say
you are one."
Does The Bible Suggest
That God Was A Failure?
Sovereign God created us in His image that we might bring honor and glory to Him and have eternal fellowship together. He
desires our love and He wanted that love to be our choice. He wanted our obedience, but He wanted that obedience to be our
choice. To suggest that God was a failure because Adam and Even made a sinful choice is ridiculous. It completely alters the
entire biblical account of man’s fall, Satan’s fall, and the results that occurred. Our world would certainly
be a different place if man had not sinned, but not for one moment was God ever a failure. The only failure was found in those
that sinned. He never ceased to be the God of His universe or of the spiritual world where His will is forever being done.
The biblical account of the years that have transpired since the
fall are filled with His story and the revelations that have never ceased to unfold. David made it clear who rules this Universe
and it has never been the devil. His words speak volumes. "The earth is the LORD'S, and the fulness thereof; the world,
and they that dwell therein. For he hath founded it upon the seas, and established it upon the floods. Who shall ascend into
the hill of the LORD? or who shall stand in his holy place? He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart; who hath not lifted
up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully. He shall receive the blessing from the LORD, and righteousness from the God
of his salvation. This is the generation of them that seek him, that seek thy face, O Jacob. Selah. Lift up your heads, O
ye gates; and be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors; and the King of glory shall come in. Who is this King of glory? The LORD
strong and mighty, the LORD mighty in battle. Lift up your heads, O ye gates; even lift them up, ye everlasting doors; and
the King of glory shall come in. Who is this King of glory? The LORD of hosts, he is the King of glory. Selah." (Psalm
You have the choice of
believing Copeland and the Crouches or God and His true prophets. Reducing God is a constant theme of these diluted pundits
(self-proclaimed authorities), but His majesty is undefeatable. The foolishness of this crowd gets worse.
The Deity Of The Son Of God In Question
Always error is on a downward spiral. Truth ascends and gets richer
and sweeter, but error descends and becomes more and more absurd. That is clearly the direction of Paul and Jan Crouch. We
will see other evidence of that in some of the new stars of TBN, but already the deity of Jesus Christ is under attack. Read
carefully the following conversation:
From Trinity Broadcasting Network’s Praise The Lord Show:
Kenneth Copeland: "We are still
questioning what was said about that prophecy. That prophecy never mentioned the Son of God. Never said anything about the
Son of God."
Paul Crouch: "What did it say?"
Copeland: "It said I did not claim to be God."
Jan Crouch: (Unintelligible sounds.)
Kenneth Copeland: "That’s
all it said."
Paul Crouch: "In other words, in so many words, you’re right, no where in the New Testament did he literally
get up . . ."
Kenneth Copeland: ". . . preach and claim that He was God . . ."
Paul Crouch: ". . . and say, ‘I am God.’
Did He? I stand corrected."
is the apparent prophecy that was being discussed by Copeland and Crouch. It is an example of the new revelations as being
claimed throughout the "New Wave" so-called revival. Christ supposedly told Copeland the following:
"Don’t be disturbed when people put you down and speak
harshly and roughly of you. They spoke that way of Me, should they not speak that way of you? The more you get to be like
Me, the more they’re going to think that way of you. They crucified Me for claiming that I was God. But I didn’t
claim I was God; I just claimed I walked with Him and He was in Me. Hallelujah." (Kenneth Copeland, "Take Time To
Pray," Believer’s Voice Of Victory 15, 2 (February 1987): 9.)
Here is an additonal quote by Copeland, which confirms his belief that Jesus
was not God as He appeared on earth.
[why] does God have to pay the price for this thing? He has to have a man that is like that first one. It’s got to be
a man. He’s got to be all man. He cannot be a God and come storming in here with attributes and dignities that are not
common to man. He can’t do that. It’s not legal." (Kenneth Copeland, "Question & Answer," Believer’s
Voice Of Victory 16, 8 (August 1988):8, emphasis in original.)
Let’s read the words of another guest that was also bold enough to deny the deity of
the Lord Jesus Christ.
Transcribed From Trinity Broadcasting Network’s Praise The Lord Show:
Joseph Good: "Yeshua (Jesus), we do not see
as being God when He walked here on earth. We see Him as a man."
Guest: "A man anointed by God."
Joseph Good: "A man anointed by
God, sent by God to perform a function. Now, in his resurrection . . ."
Guest: "He’s not God."
Joseph Good: "We do not see Him
as God. We see Him as a man anointed by God. And that has been restored. There is nothing in the statements of Yeshua, in
the statements of the disciples that would cause one to believe that they were proclaiming that He was deity."
Was Jesus Christ The Eternal Son Of God?
The Copeland, Hagin, Hinn, and Crouch, etc. theology plainly teaches
that Jesus was only human in His earthly visit. Paul Crouch makes a statement that Jesus was reincarnated as the Divine Son
when He was "born again" in hell. Let’s listen to Kenneth Copeland say that God was not the Father of Jesus
Christ, that He was an "emaciated (poured out) little wormy spirit . . . down in the bottom of that thing (the pit of
hell)." Then, we hear Benny Hinn say how Jesus was born again with Paul Crouch adding, "that is when His divinity
A Message Given By Kenneth Copeland:
"How did Jesus then on the cross say, ‘My God.’
Because God was not His Father any more. He took upon Himself the nature of Satan. And I’m telling you Jesus is in the
middle of that pit. He’s suffering all that there is to suffer, there is no suffering left . . . apart from Him. His
emaciated, little wormy spirit is down in the bottom of that thing and the devil thinks He’s got Him destroyed. But,
all of a sudden God started talking."
From Trinity Broadcasting Network’s Praise The Lord Show:
Benny Hinn: "Jesus Christ destroyed
the power of Satan on earth, but destroyed Satan in the under world, the Holy Ghost wasn’t there. Think about that."
Paul Crouch: "That’s when
His divinity returned."
The Bible Deny That Jesus Was The Eternal, Divine Son Of God?
The answer is simple. To deny His divinity, to suggest that God wasn’t His Eternal Father,
or to even consider that the Son of God had to be reincarnated as divine is total heresy. It flies in the face of the established
truth of the eternal deity of Jesus Christ. The great Apostle John settled this in his gospel and other revelations.
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and
the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made
that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended
it not." (John 1:1-5).
the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full
of grace and truth." (John 1:14).
which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands
have handled, of the Word of life; (For the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you
that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;) That which we have seen and heard declare we unto
you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ."
(1 John 1:1-3).
"I am Alpha and
Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty." (Revelation
The Lord Jesus was eternal
God and never ceased to be divine. Yes, He took on the "form of a servant and was made in the likeness of men",
but that does not even remotely suggest that He ceased to be God. God forbid that we suggest it did. Listen to this passage
of truth, "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation,
and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled
himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross." (Philippians 2:6-8).
The divine nature, by its very essence, cannot be discarded and then
reincarnated. This fallacy alone shows the total biblical collapse of the entire "Faith Movement."
The Diety Of Man And The Teaching That We Are "Little Gods"
Let’s go straight to several statements by Paul Crouch, Benny
Hinn, and Kenneth Copeland on this crucial subject. After seeing the denial of Jesus Christ’s eternal divinity, it is
amazing to hear their elevation of man unto a "god" status.
Transcribed From Trinity Broadcasting Network’s
Praise The Lord Show:
Crouch: "He doesn’t ever draw a distinction between himself." (Jan Crouch agrees
in the background.)
Kenneth Copeland: "Never, never. You never can do that in a covenant relationship."
Paul Crouch: "You know what else that settles
then tonight. This hue and cry and controversy that has been spawned by the devil to try and bring dissent within the body
of Christ that we are gods. I am a little god."
Kenneth Copeland: "Yes, yes!"
Paul Crouch: "I have His name. I’m one
with Him. I’m in a covenant relationship. I am a little god."
Kenneth Copeland: "Critic, you are anything
that He is."
Paul Crouch (heard under
the words of Kenneth Copeland): "Critic, be gone."
Paul Crouch: "Yes!"
Transcribed From Trinity Broadcasting
Network’s Praise The Lord Show:
Hinn: "Adam was a superbeing when God created Him. I don’t know whether people even
know this, but he was the first superman that ever lived. (Jan Crouch is heard laughing on the set.) First of all, the Scriptures
declare clearly that he had dominion over the fowls of the air, the fish of the sea, which means he used to fly."
Jan Crouch: "Wow!"
Benny Hinn: "Of course, how can
you have dominion over the birds and not be able to do what they do?"
Jan Crouch: "Whoa, I mean, wait a minute. Benny,
wait a minute."
Benny Hinn: "I’ll prove it to you. The word dominion in the Hebrew clearly declares that, if you have dominion
over a subject, you can do everything that subject does. In other words, that subject, if it does something that you cannot
do, you don’t have dominion over it. I’ll prove it further. Adam not only flew, he flew to space. He used to be
. . . He, He, He, He, He, He . . . with one thought He’d be on the moon."
Transcribed From A Message Given By Kenneth
reason for creating Adam was His desire to reproduce Himself and in the Garden of Eden, He did that. He was not a little like
God, He was not almost like God, he was subordinate to God, even. And Adam was as much like God as you can get . . . And I
want you to know something. Adam in the Garden of Eden was God manifested in the flesh."
Does The Scripture Teach The "Little God" Concept?
The answer is obviously, "No!" There are many great truths
of Scripture that show our humanity and the hope of a future glorification.
- Presently, We Are Tempted - "My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall
into divers temptations; Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience." (James 1:2-3).
- Our Outward Man Perisheth - "For which cause we faint not;
but though our outward man perish, yet the inward [man] is renewed day by day." (II Corinthians 4:16).
- Our Hope Is At The Completion Of Our Earthly Journey - "Wherefore
gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation
of Jesus Christ." (1 Peter 1:13).
is certainly clear that this entire concept is a cheap path to riches and earthly glory. To look for some spiritual benefit
in this false doctrine is a waste of time. The purpose of the teaching is to create a whole class of "swinging saints
living the good life", something akin to the "Beverly Hillbillies". You would think this crowd has been watching
too much television. When you look at the real Jesus of Scripture, the prophets and apostles in their suffering and sacrifice
and then return to see Paul and Jan and their fellow travelers in their glory, it all becomes a fantasy world of deception.
God Is Both Male And Female?
The pagan roots of this whole deception is manifest as they create a God that
becomes more like Zeus or the pantheon of ancient gods. I have been aware for some time that this entire theological confusion
was headed back to its pagan roots. These men and women are clever, but they will eventually become so deluded that the error
will show through. Listen as Kenneth Copeland clearly states that God is both male and female. Next, listen to Benny Hinn
state that women were first created to bear children out of their side. Then, he somehow compares this to Jesus and the spear
print in His side.
A Message Given By Kenneth Copeland:
"Then, he created Eve out of Adam. Now, actually God didn’t
name her Eve, Adam named her Eve later. That wasn’t her name, her name was Adam . . . Adam. When God said Adam, they
both came. Their authority was one and the same together. They did everything together. They had always been together. Even
when she was still part of him, he was as much female as he was male, LIKE GOD IS. And God separated the female part of him
and then put them back together. And she was Adam, they were Adam. He was the man, she was the woman. She was the man with
A Message Given By Benny Hinn:
"Holy Spirit said something to me and I had to go like a mad
man and looking in the Word. He says, ‘God’s original plan is that the woman was to bring forth children out of
her side.’ What? You know that there is nowhere in the Bible but where God gives birth out of His side. Jesus gives
birth to the church out of His side. Adam gives birth to his wife out of his side. It was sin that turned the thing around.
And it was sin that transformed her flesh and her body."
Such an idea is certainly blasphemous. It is exactly the same foolishness that elevates Mary,
the mother of Jesus, to the state of "The Mother of God." Many writers are beginning to suggest as Copeland that
God has a dual nature of male and female. The entire new headquarters of Trinity Broadcasting Network is feminine in design.
There are female angels guarding the entrance to the television studio. The ceilings are filled with frollicking, mostly nude
children. Two pictures of the mother/child deception and one of a feminine face, with two nude young bodies hovering above,
line the short hallway leading past the female angels to the studio. The appearance is mythological and pagan.
The Bible is absolutely clear that God is our Heavenly Father. His
nature is divine and eternal and sexual distinctions are non-existent. He created man in His image and then created woman
in the image of man. There are no female angels because the angelic host were created in the image of God before women were
created. Women are a unique creation out of man to supply him a helpmeet and has absolutely nothing to do with the nature
and appearance of God. This false concept of God being both male and female is clear decension into paganism.
God As Mother Nature
As we move to the concept of a dual nature, both male and female, manifest in
the Heavenly Father, the results can only lead to more disgusting ideas. The new additional studio of Trinity Broadcasting
Network in Hendersonville, TN, is the scene of the following quotes. Jan Crouch appears to be the host of these events, with
preachers like Phil Munsey and Kim Clement. On one occasion Phil is preaching and appears to be speaking more from "fertility
rites of ancient paganism" than the Bible itself. He states:
Transcribed From Trinity Broadcasting Network, Hendersonville,
Phil Munsey: "There is going to be a paradigm shift in philosophies of men. Mother Earth is groaning in travail,
labouring pain, ready to give birth to something big and something mighty and wonderful . . . God is moving, connect with
As he preaches, he mentions
the Buddhists and directs his remarks to them. "Buddhists, I love you much, I’m honored that you are willing to
get out of yourself and take a risk and go for something that people used to laugh at. I’m honored that you have enough
passion for God to try to connect with something."
Phil Munsey: "In the Throne Zone, time past, present, and
future cease to exist. We move into a frame without the limitation of humanity in the natural."
In the course of these several nights of so-called revival, he apparently
tried to show that people in the heathen world have learned how to connect with the principles of God without being Christians.
I presume this is why he spoke so kindly of the Buddhist. Listen:
Phil Munsey: "People learn how to work the principles of
God, they learn how to operate in the charisma of God without the character of God and that makes good people mad."
Phil Munsey: "Get your ears to
hear what the Spirit says now, Get your ears to hear what the Spirit says now. (Supposedly, the Spirit is speaking through
him.) I tell you that the kingdom of God is so due and overdue. I tell you that Mother Nature and I don’t mind using
that word . . . It is now time for the New Jerusalem to come down out of heaven and kiss the earth until all that God is shall
be made known and His glory fills the earth . . . I tell you what God is going to, has to do. He’s either going to shut
some mouths up that are aborting the purpose of God and bring some marriages . . . If you are a virgin and you are telling
people you are pregnant, you could get stoned."
Phil Munsey: "God is looking for a womb to bring forth His Rhenna upon the
earth. The Bible says in Isaiah, chapter 34:16, and I love the Amplified Version, that everything in nature has a mate of
which they bring forth from their seed . . . Every Word of God has a mate . . ."
Can Truth Of Scripture Be Blended With Pagan Doctrines?
The answer is obviously a resounding, "No!" When God the
Father becomes "mother god" as much as "father god", anything becomes possible in the pulpit. The term
Mother Earth, as used by Munsey on these TBN Broadcasts suggests that the paradigm shift has reached an intense level of change.
These doctrines will be preached very carefully for a while and then the speakers will grow blatant and arrogant.
Notice that Munsey says that the Spirit was saying, "the kingdom
of God is so due and overdue." Is God ever late? Does He have to apologize for the failure of His plan? Copeland has
already answered that on an earlier Praise The Lord telecast. "God," says Copeland, "was the biggest failure
ever in history." Paganism has arrived at the pulpits of many churches.
Stand On The Word Of God
My dear friends, get back to the truth of God’s Eternal Word with all of
your heart. Truth will set you free. Do not allow these "New Wave" preachers to force you to deny the beautiful
ministry of the Holy Ghost in your life. The Holy Spirit was sent by the Father as the Spirit of Truth. His living presence
in the church will cause the Word of God to come alive. My heart is set on a reformation in the Body of Christ. The church
world has a multitude of sincere believers who love the eternal Son of God and many of them have been influenced by these
pagan ideas. Pray earnestly for the "Word of God to prevail." Let’s be sure that each one of us gets back
into total truth and believes for a revival of New Testament Christianity.
Pray earnestly for the Crouches and others that truth will
prevail in their lives. Millions are being led into deeper and deeper error and everyone of us has an obligation to help them
learn the truth. Share this information with everybody in your sphere of influence.
- [Source: Paw
Creek Ministries - 5110 Tuckaseegee Road - Charlotte, NC 28208 - (704) 391-0588 - http://www.pawcreek.org/mainpage.htm
is a copycat religion created by Emperor Constantine (for political purposes). (Incidentally, Constantine murdered his
wife and his son, and later, the Church made him a Saint.)
(For greater shocking revelations,
see “Crimes of the Popes”, here) : http://www.ftarchives.net/foote/crimes/c7.htm )
Saint Constantine’s copycat religion was based upon a myth (The Persian
savior god Mithra, crucified 600 B.C. ? 400 B.C.?), which was based on other similar myths, all the way back to Chrishna
of India (a mythical god that some claim was “crucified” around 1200 B.C.). There were 16 mythical crucifixions
before Christ. The belief in the crucifixion of Gods was prevalent in various oriental or heathen countries long prior to
the reported crucifixion of Christ. Of the 16 crucifixions, most were born of a virgin and about half of
them on December 25th.
take a look at the book “Beyond All Religion-Beyond religious SCRIPTURES and practices that support intolerance violence
and even war, A PEACEFUL WORLD AWAITS”. Website: http://www.beyondallreligion.net/ Included: How is this for religious intolerance? Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, “One million
Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” Muhammad married a 6 year old girl. Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism
had 24 wives, one was 14 years old. Smith was convicted of fraud (of being an “imposter”- a con man), in a court
of law.. Then he wrote “The Book of Mormon..”. The story of Moses is patterned after the story of Sargon the
Great. Moses did not exist. Christianity was invented for political purposes by the Roman Emperor Constantine
(“The Great”) in 325 A.D. based on the myth of Mithra (Persian savior god born on December 25th). Look at “Compassion Center” on Facebook. A wonderful alternative to religion.
Emperor Constantine-continued: There were too many religions in Rome in 325 A.D. A
Council was called in an endeavor to amalgamate the many religions of the Roman Empire into one. Christianity plagiarized
older myths and legends historicized to suit the Roman Catholic Church while combining the numerous religions existing at
the time (Krishna, Horus, Mithraism, Osirian, Isis, and many other mystery religions). For unity and to stop all the
conflicts between the numerous religions…
Christianity was INVENTED. Eusebius (Bishop of Caesarea in Palestine “Father of Church History“) attended the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. and was a friend of Emperor Constantine, who also attended and made the
keynote speech. Constantine instructed Eusebius to organize the
compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at the
council. Eusebius has been described as follows: Jacob Burckhardt (19th century cultural historian) dismissed
Eusebius as “the first thoroughly dishonest historian of antiquity”. He has been
also described as “a political theologian”. He favored doctoring his history in his own words to “be useful
first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity”. Edward Gibbon (18th century historian –“The Decline and
Fall of the Roman Empire”) dismissed his testimony on the number of martyrs and impugned his honesty At first, there
was controversy about the new religion at the Council of Nicaea. Some claimed it was a fiction and Christ was a fiction,
but they did not prevail. .
(To be clear on this matter, I say don’t
trust Eusebius’s reports of the Apostles or how the Apostles died, and be suspicious of all of his writings.)
– Author Samuel Butler
Eusebius then arranged for
scribes to produce fifty sumptuous copies to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable
form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art (ibid.).
orders, said Eusebius, were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself we sent him [Constantine] magnificently
and elaborately bound volumes of three-fold and four-fold forms (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, p.36). They were
the New Testimonies, and this is the first mention (c. 331) of the New Testament in the historical record. With
his instructions fulfilled, Constantine then decreed that the New Testimonies would thereafter be called the word
of the Roman Saviour God (Life of Constantine, vol. iii, p. 29) and official to all presbyters sermonising in the Roman
He then ordered earlier presbyterial manuscripts and the records of the council
burnt and declared that any man found concealing writings should be stricken off from his shoulders (beheaded).
NONE OF THESE 50 NEW TESTAMENTS EXIST TODAY OR ARE ADMITTED TO EXISTING!
TESTAMENT WAS THE OFFICIAL BOOK OF THE NEW UNIFIED RELIGION OF CONSTANTINE NOT THE BIBLE!
BOOKS TO BE BURNED ,THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE TORAH/OLD TESTAMENT
IT INCLUDED BURNING THE GREAT
LIBRARY OF ALEXANDRIA IN EGYPT 391 A.D.
In 391 A.D., Christian Emperor Theodosius I
ordered the destruction of all pagan (“heathen” they were also called) temples. The Christian Patriarch
Theophilus of Alexandria (Egypt) complied with this request. Seizing this opportunity, Theophilus exerted himself
to the utmost to expose the pagan mysteries to contempt, the Serapeum also he showed full of extravagant superstitions,
(and) the commander-in-chief of the troops in Egypt, assisted Theophilus in demolishing the heathen temples (and) then
he destroyed the Serapeum. -Historia Ecclesiastica
The Serapeum housed the Great Library of Alexandria.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_alexandria Why there are no records of Jesus Christ?
Federic William Farrar
not possible to find in any legitimate religious or historical writings compiled between the beginning of the first
century and well into the fourth century any reference to Jesus Christ and the spectacular events that the Church says
accompanied his life. This confirmation comes from Frederic Farrar (1831-1903) of Trinity College, Cambridge:
“It is amazing that history has not embalmed for us even one certain or definite saying or circumstance
in the life of the Saviour of mankind … there is no statement in all history that says anyone saw Jesus or talked
with him. Nothing in history is more astonishing than the silence of contemporary writers about events relayed
in the four Gospels.” (The Life of Christ, Frederic W. Farrar, Cassell, London, 1874)
arises from a conflict between history and New Testament narratives. Dr Tischendorf made this comment:
“We must frankly admit that we have no source of information with respect to the life of Jesus Christ
other than ecclesiastic writings assembled during the fourth century.” (Codex Sinaiticus, Dr Constantin von Tischendorf,
British Library, London)
There is an explanation for those hundreds of years of silence:
the construct of Christianity did not begin until after the first quarter of the fourth century, and that is why Pope
Leo X (d. 1521) called Christ a “fable” (Cardinal Bembo: His Letters…, op. cit.), and later Pope
Paul III expressed similar sentiments, saying that there was no valid document to demonstrate the existence of Christ.
He confessed that Jesus never existed, adding that he was no other than the sun, adored in its Mithraic sect…”
BUT WAIT, WHAT DOES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SAY ABOUT THIS?
will be surprised: From: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biblianazar/esp_biblianazar_40.htm :
What (your local) Church doesn’t know and/or wouldn’t want
you to know, if they knew.
It has often been emphasized that Christianity is
unlike any other religion, for it stands or falls by certain events which are alleged to have occurred during a short period
of time some 20 centuries ago. Those stories are presented in the New Testament, and as new evidence is revealed it will
become clear that they do not represent historical realities.
The Church agrees, saying:
documentary sources of knowledge about the origins of Christianity and its earliest development are chiefly the New Testament
Scriptures, the authenticity of which we must, to a great extent, take for granted.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley
ed., vol. iii, p. 712)
The Church makes extraordinary admissions about its New Testament.
For example, when discussing the origin of those writings, “the most distinguished body of academic opinion ever assembled”
(Catholic Encyclopedias, Preface) admits that the Gospels “do not go back to the first century of the Christian era”
(Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. vi, p. 137, pp. 655-6).
This statement conflicts
with priesthood assertions that the earliest Gospels were progressively written during the decades following the death of
the Gospel (sic) Jesus Christ. In a remarkable aside, the Church further admits that, “the earliest of the extant
manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”–
(Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7).
That is some 350 years after the time the
Church claims that a Jesus Christ walked the sands of Palestine, and here the true story of Christian origins slips into
one of the biggest black holes in history. There is, however, a reason why there were no New Testaments until the fourth
century: they were not written until then, and here we find evidence of the greatest misrepresentation of all time.
It was British-born Flavius Constantinus (Constantine, originally Custennyn or Custennin) (272-337) who authorized the compilation
of the writings now called the New Testament.
Yes, but what about references
to the four Gospels supposedly before the 3rd Century A.D.?
What about Tacitus, Roman Historian, who wrote about the persecutions of the early “Christians”?
Regarding Tacitus, (Senator and Historian of the Roman Empire) these writings supporting the persecution were mysteriously found
in the 15th century in the forests of Germany, following a reward offered by Leo X for old writings, and following a history
of forgeries in Catholicism: In any case, there has been serious questions about the integrity of the famous passage
From: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/tacitus.html Gordon Stein denied the authenticity of this passage, arguing: (1) no corroborating evidence that Nero persecuted
the Christians (2) there was not a multitude of Christians in Rome at that date (3) Christian was not a common term in the
first century (4) Nero was indifferent to various religions in his city (5) Nero did not start the fire in Rome (6) Tacitus
does not use the name Jesus (7) Tacitus assumes his readers know Pontius Pilate Yes, but what about Josephus?
His reference to Jesus in Testimonium Flavianum has been claimed as a later addition, (Forgery-Author)
not questioning the authenticity of the main work.
Josephus’s Testimonium Flavianum
Examined Linguistically Greek Analysis Demonstrates the Passage a Forgery In
From D.M. Murdock
Who Was Jesus?
gratitude to Dr. Paul J. Hopper for his review of this paper)
The passage about
Jesus Christ in Jewish historian Josephus’s writings
been debated for centuries, as concerns its authenticity totally, partially
or not at all
. This brief “testimonium” is proffered by Christian apologists as the “best evidence” for the historicity
of Jesus, but it has been declared many times to be a forgery in toto. A recent study by a renowned linguist confirms this
analysis of the entire passage as an interpolation by a Christian scribe, likely during the fourth
century or late
Yes, but what about Pliny the Younger’s letter
to Emperor Trajan 112 A.D.(Pliny was not a contemporary of Jesus, and he never mentions
“Jesus”?) Pliny the Younger (c. 61 – c. 112), the provincial governor of Pontus and Bithynia, wrote to Emperor Trajan c. 112 concerning how to deal with Christians, who refused to worship the emperor, and instead worshiped “Christus”.
What about that?
Guignebert, who does not doubt that Jesus of the Gospels lived in Gallilee in the 1st century, nevertheless dismisses this
letter as acceptable historical evidence:
“Only the most robust credulity could
reckon this assertion as admissible evidence for the historicity of Jesus” – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
Nevertheless, I was concerned about the possibility of far older Gospels when I was stating that
Christianity was invented around 325 A.D., but the research thread leads back to Eusebius, the FORGER, (“Papias, quoted
Eusebius was the dishonest Church
Father historian of antiquity who made up a lot of Church history. “we shall introduce
into this history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity”. The
research thread (about older Gospels) also leads to the “spurious” writings of Irenaeus: http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/gospels-late-forgeries/blog-249881/ .
THE RELIGIOUS QUICKSAND OF EARLY CHRISTIAN WRITINGS.
A SCHOLAR AND YOU WILL BE QUICKLY SWALLOWED UP IN QUICKSAND RESEARCHING SO-CALLED “PRE-NICENE”
What about pre-nicene so-called “Early
Christian” (Gnostic?) writings? They disagreed with each other, were riddled with conflict and forgeries,
of questionable and confusing timing and origin , had conflicting opinions about supposed truths, and were not coherent
enough for an organized religion. So the myth of Mithra, the Persian Savior God, was chosen by Emperor Constantine and Bishop
Eusebius as the model to create the new religion , Christianity. What if there are references to Christ and/or Jesus
in pre-nicene writings? That doesn’t mean Jesus or Christ existed. What if there are references to “fairies”
in pre-nicene literature? That wouldn’t mean fairies existed, prior to the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD
or later, even if the Council claimed the existence of fairies and made it doctrine, with severe penalties for those who
denied their existence.
Yes, but what about Church father Justin Martyr’s purported
use of the New Testament gospels? From Acharya S., Biblical scholar: (http://www.freethoughtnation.com/contributing-writers/63-acharya-s/679-does-justin-martyr-quote-the-gospels.html) “No verbatim quotes or unambiguous citations from the canonical gospels as
we have them appear anywhere in Justin’s extant works.” Matthew, Mark and Luke are never named
by Justin; nor is John. Nor does Justin Martyr name any of the evangelists in any known text.
All of the Gospels were written
by anonymous authors, not by the actual disciples . In fact, the Church doesn’t even have the anonymous writings
that purport to be written by a disciple that was written before the middle of the 4th century. “The earliest
of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”–
(Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7).
That is saying, they have no manuscript of Mark,. no manuscript
of Matthew nor Luke, nor John, written before the middle of the 4th century.
Episcopal Bishop says Hell is an invention of the church to control people with fear:
Information about Eusebius, Constantine, and Paul. FATHER EUSEBIUS, FORGER:http://www.christianity-revealed.com/cr/files/fathereusebiustheforger.html (One view, for what it’s worth-a bit harsh) _______________________________________
This False Prophet's name is John Hagee. An evangelical Zionist that is on record
stating the Jewish people don't need Christ John Rand https://www.facebook.com/groups/John.Rand.Group/permalink/207710599356617/SEE ALSO ...
How Americans Were Manipulated into Loving
The vast majority of Christians that I’ve met
are Zionists. They not only espouse a Jewish right to a homeland in Israel, but they refer to Jews as “God’s
Chosen People” and believe it is their duty as good Christians to defend Israel no matter what.
When I ask Christians whether Zionism is a valid position to hold,
I am not asking whether they believe in the Jewish right to their own homeland. I believe that every group of people should
have their own homeland, if they should desire one. Instead, I am talking about the reflexive posture of submission
and servility shown by Christian Zionists towards the state of Israel in the belief that doing so will bring blessings from
love Israel. While it is not unusual to find people of Irish or Polish descent who love Ireland or Poland, there
are millions of Americans who love Israel even though they have no connection to the small, Middle Eastern country. Why
is this the case?
Israel is a country with a clear purpose
There are things to admire about Israel. The
most important is its clarity of purpose. The primary goal of Israel is to protect the country and its citizens. Israelis
take attacks against their people personally. In 2015, when a terrorist stabbed two people in Jerusalem, civilians and even
a police officer beat and kicked the terrorist who had already been shot. But Americans and Europeans have been conditioned to think as atomized units, not as a
single people. Terrorism, which is an act of war against a nation, is treated merely has a crime.
Israel’s ability to put its own interests first has enabled
it to undertake efficient action in defending itself. In 2010, Mossad assassinated a Hamas official in a Dubai hotel. The
assassination, which involved nine agents, is like something out of a James Bond movie. When Israeli citizens were hijacked in Entebbe Airport in Uganda, the Israeli Defense Forces undertook a daring overnight raid. And while weak Western leaders hold hands and mouth platitudes after each terrorist attack, Israeli leaders like Benjamin
Netanyahu are strong, confident, and unabashedly pro-Israel. For many Americans, cheering for Israel is like supporting
a winning team, while their own country’s actions give them little reason to get excited.
The feeling that millions of Americans have about Israel is much deeper than mere admiration. It is better described
as idolization. There are several reasons this idolization exists.
First, Israel has a
powerful political lobby, AIPAC. American Jews are generally very successful and they use their money to support their politics,
and this includes Israel. American politicians from both sides of the aisle, anxious to get donations, make the most boot-licking speeches at the annual AIPAC conference. Thus, it doesn’t really matter whether you elect a Republican or a Democrat.
You can rest assured that they will be ardently pro-Israel.
MORE: WAR CRIMES: Israeli Planes Spray Crop-Killing Chemicals on Gaza Farms
The biggest reason why so Americans love Israel, even more than their own country, is not due to the work of AIPAC.
Rather, it is the result of a peculiar Christian heresy—the heresy of Dispensationalism.
Dispensationalism originated with John Nelson
Darby, an English Christian preacher who lived in the 1800s. It only received wide popularity, though, through the influence
of the Scofield Bible. The Scofield Bible contains Dispensationalist commentary by Cyrus I. Scofield (1843-1921).
There are allegations
that Scofield was influenced by Jewish Zionists. Though Scofield was a fundamentalist preacher, he was admitted as a member
of the Lotus Club, an elite NYC men’s club. One of the club’s committee members was Wall Street lawyer Samuel
Untermeyer. Author David Lutz suggests that it may have been Untermeyer who encouraged Scofield to write his commentary:
Untermeyer used Scofield… to inject Zionist ideas into American Protestantism. Untermeyer and other wealthy and influential Zionists whom he introduced to Scofield
promoted and funded the latter’s career, including travel in Europe.
What’s wrong with Dispensationalism
To understand why Dispensationalism is so perverted,
it’s necessary to explain what Christians believed before Dispensationalism came on the scene. Traditional Christian
theology teaches that the Christian covenant is the “new and eternal covenant” that fulfills
all the past covenants including God’s covenant with Israel.
John Charles Hagee
In Second Corinthians, St. Paul says
that the old covenant has “faded away.” The Epistle to the Romans says that Christ is “the end of the
law” meaning he was both the goal and the termination of the old covenant. Traditional theology also teaches that the
Christian Church is the true continuation of Israel: Jesus is Israel’s true Messiah and the fulfillment of Old Testament
prophecy. Therefore, the Church, which includes gentiles and Christians Jews, is “the Israel of God” (Gal. 6:16),
not Jews by physical descent. Let me say it again for emphasis: the traditional Christian belief is that the Church is the
true continuation of Israel.
SEE MORE: Jewish Survivors of Holocaust & Their Descendants Condemn Israel’s Massacre of Palestinians
Thus, for 1800 years, Christians did not believe the re-establishment of a Jewish state or modern
day Israel. They played no role in the biblical prophecy. Dispensationalism changed that. Dispensationalists believe
that the Christian Church is God’s “Plan B.” With the Church, God is merely taking a temporary break before
getting to what He really cares about—Israel according to the flesh. This can be seen in the picture at the head of
this section which portrays three horses—two large Jewish ones (don’t ask me why there are two) and one small
Christian one. The Church that Christ died for is an afterthought.
Dispensationalism is largely a Protestant phenomenon. Most Baptist
and non-denominational churches subscribe to it, which means that most Evangelical Christians are also dispensationalists.
While the Catholic Church does not teach dispensationalism, some Catholics have also succumbed. I had one Catholic on Twitter
block me after I told him that the modern state of Israel plays no special role in Christian theology.
Dispensationalism has practical impacts on how its adherents behave in the real world. Dispensationalist Christians
have applied the following verse to Israel and Jews in general: “I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses
you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you” (Gen 12:3). In context, the verse refers to
Abraham the patriarch, but Dispensationalist Christians take it to mean that whoever supports Jews and Israel, will be personally
John Charles Hagee is the founder and senior pastor of Cornerstone
Church, a megachurch in San Antonio, Texas. Hagee is also the CEO of his non-profit corporation, Global Evangelism Television
This type of thinking
is extremely powerful form of conditioning. Everyone wants to be personally blessed by God and here is a passage that Evangelicals believe guarantee them blessings.
More realistically, it guarantees Israel a large block of voters who will consistently and unquestioningly support pro-Israel
policies. No other countries, including staunch US allies France and Great Britain, have such a solid base of support.
are a potent force in American politics so US politicians go out of their way to appeal to this fervor. During one of the
GOP debates in 2015, each of the 16 candidates mentioned the security of Israel in their closing statement. This blatant
pandering caused Ann Coulter to tweet: “How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?”
But the candidates were not just targeting wealthy Jewish donors, but all those Evangelical voters who have been programmed
to support Israel.
This disordered love of Israel is not harmless. It has helped lead the United States into dubious wars in the Middle
East in support of Israel. It has also spurred the development of Islamic fundamentalism and Islamic terrorism. ISIS came
about due to US support of “moderate rebels” to depose Syrian president Assad, an enemy of Israel. And blind
support of Israel may eventually lead us into a war with Iran—a country that poses no military threat to the US.
SEE MORE: Balkanizing the Middle East: The REAL Goal of America and Israel: Shatter Syria and Iraq Into “Many Small Pieces”
The ethical defense of other people
Now that we have examined the “Old
vs. New Covenant” dilemma, let us move on to examining whether it’s truly ethical to defend any particular
group of people–no matter what they do.
I think it’s a fairly dangerous position to take, and one that leads to very negative
logical conclusions. After all, if one has made up one’s mind to defend a person or group of people no matter
what they do, then is there any point at which one would hold said person or people accountable?
Is there any crime so vicious, any act so heinous,
that your sense of decency (or self-preservation) would kick in and you would want to defend yourself from them,
instead of defending those actions?
Or, if the Israeli politicians are “God’s Chosen People” who can do no wrong,
do you simply turn a blind eye to anything bad they do out of fear of offending God?
This is a very serious matter, as the Old Testament does say
that those who curse the Israelites will be cursed in turn. It puts the thinking man in a difficult position, if he believes
in the Old Testament and ignores Paul’s thoughts on the topic.
Of course, the problem is easily solved if it is true that the “Jewish”
people currently running Israel have no blood relation to the ancient Biblical Israelites. If that’s the case, then
not only are Christians under no obligation whatsoever to mindlessly defend them, but we can also safely hold them accountable
for their actions without fear of divine retaliation.
Click on this text to get an idea of what Jews really think of Christ and Christians...
Click on this text to view the folly of Christian Zionism....
Nearly 70 million Christians in the United States accept
or are heavily influenced by the belief system of Christian Zionism. The primary requirement of Christian Zionism is the
belief that the modern state of Israel is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. So 20% of the population of America thinks
we MUST conduct WAR FOR Israel! Only 2% of the population is Jewish. So you can see what we are up against! This is the
biggest pro-war voting block in America. They do seem to be getting their way!
Zionism, also referred to as Premillennialism, Judeo-Christianity and Dispensationalism was considered heresy for the first
1800 years of the church until it reappeared in 1830. With the publishing of the Scofield Reference Bible in 1908, Christian
Zionism found a mainstream audience. Why would millions of Christians worldwide forsake fundamental Christian values in
favor of war, persecution and fear, yet continue to call this behavior Christian?
is replete with instances of people using religion for political and monetary gain. Jesus Christ warns of this in the New
Testament. Christianity today is being used as an excuse for theft, murder, destruction and deception. The majority of
Christians supporting this have no idea what they’re supporting or why they believe this.
This video proves the deception beyond question. It shows you how Christianity is being used for political purposes
in direct contradiction to the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Click on this text to see 'Marching to Zion' - Christian Zionism and 1948 Israel Exposed! ...
THE INCREDIBLE SCHOFIELD
And his perversion of Christianity
for the Zionist Jews.
In his 2008 book, The Rise
of Israel: A History of a Revolutionary State, Jonathan R. Adelman describes the crucial support Israel receives from Christian
fundamentalists as “totally fortuitous.” That assertion is belied, however, by the incredible career of the man
who wrote “the Bible of Fundamentalism.”
Two years after Scofield’s reported conversion to Christianity in 1879, the Atchison Patriot was less than impressed.
Describing the former Atchison resident as the “late lawyer, politician and shyster generally,” the article went
on to recount a few of Scofield’s “many malicious acts.” These included a series of forgeries in St. Louis,
for which he was sentenced to six months in jail.
Being a “born again” preacher did not preclude Scofield from becoming a member of an exclusive New York men’s
club in 1901, either. In his devastating biography, The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph M. Canfield suggests, “The
admission of Scofield to the Lotus Club, which could not have been sought by Scofield, strengthens the suspicion that has
cropped up before, that someone was directing the career of C.I. Scofield.”
That someone, Canfield suspects, was associated with one of the club’s committee
members, the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. As Canfield intimates, Scofield’s theology was “most helpful
in getting Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer’s pet projects—the
Others have been
even more explicit about the nature of Scofield’s service to the Zionist agenda. In “Unjust War Theory: Christian
Zionism and the Road to Jerusalem,” Prof. David W. Lutz writes, “Untermeyer used Scofield, a Kansas City lawyer
with no formal training in theology, to inject Zionist ideas into American Protestantism. Untermeyer and other wealthy and
influential Zionists whom he introduced to Scofield promoted and funded the latter’s career, including travel in Europe.”
On one of these European trips, Oxford University
Press publisher Henry Frowde “expressed immediate interest” in Scofield’s project. According to a biography
of Frowde, although the OUP publisher was “[n]ot demonstrative in his religious views, all his Christian life he was
associated with brethren known as ‘Exclusive.’” The “Exclusive Brethren” refers to the group
of Christian evangelicals that, in an 1848 split in the Plymouth Brethren, followed John Nelson Darby, the Anglo-Irish missionary
generally considered to have been the most influential figure in the development of Christian Zionism, and a major influence
Had the Scofield Bible never been published, American presidents influenced by Christian Zionism such as Truman,
Johnson, Reagan and George W. Bush might have been less sympathetic to Israeli demands, and consequently more attentive
to U.S. interests. Moreover, the American people could have been spared the pseudo-Christian rants of John Hagee, Pat Robertson
and the late Jerry Falwell, not to mention the lucrative End Times Rapture “prophecy” peddled by Hal Lindsey
and Tim LaHaye.
But it is the people of the Middle
East who have been most affected by an expansionist Israel emboldened by the unswerving allegiance of Christian Zionists
led to believe that Scofield’s words are God’s will. Not least among the many victims of the Scofield Bible are
5 million Palestinian refugees whose right to return is fervently opposed by America’s Zionized Christians. Thanks
to their indoctrination by Scofield’s unholy book, they believe that Palestine belongs not to the Palestinians—many
of whom are fellow Christians—but exclusively to “God’s chosen people.” ❑
Maidhc Ó Cathail writes extensively on U.S. foreign policy and the Middle
East. He is also the creator and editor of The Passionate Attachment blog, which focuses primarily on the U.S.-Israeli relationship.
Click on this text to see Christian Zionism : the biggest Deception Revealed ...
Roots of American Christian Zionism. Part I
Long before John Locke set about writing his late 17th century works which laid the foundations
for political liberalism in the Anglo-Saxon world (and the broader West), there existed the already deeply entrenched religious
views of Martin Luther and John Calvin. The works of these two founding fathers of Protestantism greatly influenced the
spiritual, cultural, political, social and economic Weltanschauung of Americans far more than anything written by Locke or
any of the other social contract philosophers of the Enlightenment (e.g. Hobbes, Rousseau, Kant, et al.). This unique American
worldview, or more specifically culture-soul, which arose on the rocky shores of New England during the first half
of the 17th century, can indeed be classified as “Calvinist” as it exhibits many distinctly Calvinist
traits such as the Protestant Ethic, staunch individualism, an obsession with the concept of God’s Chosen People,
the belief in exceptionalism, a universal world mission, etcetera. However, there is a specific ideological catalyst
within Calvinism which itself provided the foundation for the tradition of Christian Zionism to take root – a tradition
which for the past 400 years has flourished in North America and indeed is flourishing today like never before among evangelical
Christians, Neoconservatives and a variety of other groups. The ideological catalyst alluded to is Judeocentric prophecy
interpretation. Without this fundamental ideological catalyst firmly in place (implanted as it was in early Protestant
theology), it is highly doubtful whether the subsequent doctrine of Christian Zionism would have ever arisen – a doctrine
which has had an enormous influence not only on American religion and politics but on American culture and identity as well.
Without question, the strongest advocates of Christian Zionism in the United States today are evangelical
Christians. Here it is important to understand that the evangelicals are not only a religious group, but they are a highly
mobilized political bloc who enjoy an enormous amount of support nationwide (especially in the South and Midwest), and thus
they wield a great amount of political power. The defining characteristic or trait of evangelical Christians is not their
belief in Jesus (which would make them no different from other nominal Christian groups) but rather their unconditional
support for the modern terroristic state of Israel. Indeed, it is their unabashed Zionist fanaticism which has caused
many to refer to evangelicals as “Christian Zionists” – and indeed, in the author’s opinion, these
two terms (“evangelical” and “Christian Zionist”) are synonymous.
Understanding the two intertwined facts that (1) Christian Zionists possess a great deal of power in the U.S. and
(2) they are absolutely fanatical when it comes to supporting Israel also helps one to understand why a pro-Jewish lobbying
organization like AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) has so much political influence in the United States.
But then the following questions naturally arise: Why are there all of these
Zionist Christians? Where did they come from? Why is Christian Zionism so prevalent in America, etc.? To answer these questions
we must study both the historical and ideological bases of Judeocentric prophecy interpretation, as well
as the Judeocentric tradition of biblical hermeneutics in general. We must therefore begin our study in the most obvious
place: the Protestant Reformation and Martin Luther.
The important thing to know
about Luther with regard to Judeocentric prophecy interpretation is his absolute emphasis on biblical literalism
– i.e. his insistence on the idea that when one reads and interprets the bible, it must be taken literally. Luther
inaugurated this patently Protestant view which, it should be said, fundamentally differs from medieval hermeneutics. For
example, medieval theologians tried to embrace as many approaches as possible when interpreting biblical texts – they
were quite literally Catholic (i.e. universal) in this sense. They would interpret the bible metaphorically, allegorically,
anagogically – as many ways as possible in order to extract every last drop of biblical “juice” or meaning
from the text. But Luther went in a very different direction. He insisted on literalism. Thus, Luther insisted on interpreting
all history through a narrow biblical lens. In other words, he insisted on looking to historical events for confirmations
and clues to past and future prophecies.
As the unequivocal founder (or “first
father”) of Protestantism, Luther had obviously made prime enemies with the Pope and the entire Catholic Church as
a religious and political institution. Accordingly, Luther directed his most passionate attacks against Catholicism. Nevertheless,
there was another very powerful religio-political force which Luther frequently denounced – the Ottoman Empire. And
so, in his interpretation of biblical prophecy Luther considered the Antichrist as being a two-headed demonic entity, which
is to say a “Turco-Catholic” Antichrist. Both Muslims and Catholics were considered to be two sides of the same
satanic coin, as it were.
Regarding the Jews, it is well known that Luther became
notoriously anti-Jewish later in life, going so far as to publish a work in 1543 entitled On the Jews and Their Lies.
Nevertheless, Luther was the first theologian to advance the notion of Jewish national conversion – a belief
that still persists among some Christian Zionists. Those who subscribe to the doctrine of Jewish national conversion essentially
believe that preceding Christ’s return, there will be a mass conversion of Jews to Christianity, and that this conversion
will actually hasten the Second Coming of Christ. It must be stressed that John Calvin also believed in the idea of Jewish
national conversion, in addition to all of the other biblical-literalist ideas advanced by Luther.
Now then, many of the English followers of Luther and Calvin were absolutely captivated by the prospect
of a Jewish national conversion – and it is precisely in England where Christian Zionism first rears its
head as a popular religious force. It was on account of the pro-Jewish advocacy and intellectual influence of a number of
English Christian Zionists that Oliver Cromwell was persuaded to reverse the centuries-old prohibition on Jews entering
England, which had been enacted in 1290 by King Edward I. Thus, in 1657 Jews were once again permitted (and even encouraged)
to settle in England.
The English Puritans were, needless to say, very elated to
see the Jews return. They interpreted this historical event in the same way Luther or Calvin would – as a clear sign
from God which would mark the imminent return of Christ. And so they immediately began trying to convert as many Jews to
Protestantism as possible, only to find (to their great chagrin) that they were in fact converting no one. The Puritans
soon discovered that the conversion of a single Jew was something which was extremely rare. Moreover, they soon realized
that the Jews only wanted to be left alone – they wanted to remain in their own communities, maintain their own culture
and traditions, to conduct business and to go about their lives. In other words, the Jews wanted to remain Jews. This fact
greatly disappointed the English Puritans because, quite clearly, their apocalyptic hopes were “riding” on a
different outcome (as it were) and were thus not being fulfilled in a literal way. And so, their hermeneutical interpretation
changed from having a strong emphasis on literalism to favoring a more allegorical interpretation along the lines of preterism.
(Preterist theology maintains that the prophecies described in the bible are not really prophecies but sets of allegories
for events which have already occurred.)
Thus, preterist interpretations started
to arise among the Puritans of England, and philology began to be used in hermeneutics by leading European philosophers
like Hobbes, Grotius, Spinoza and others. It is important to stress, at this point, that on account of the relative isolation
of the American colonies from the events taking place in England, the turning away from literalism in hermeneutics did not
take hold in America. If anything, the intertwined ideas of biblical literalism and pro-Jewish sentiment would only grow
stronger becoming a staple of American religion, thereby distinguishing it greatly from its British counterpart.
In his famous 1630 “City upon a Hill” speech, John Winthrop (the first governor of the Massachusetts
Bay Colony) compared his fellow Puritan settlers to the Jews of the Old Testament. Winthrop stated that, like the Jews,
the Puritans were expelled from their homes in England; like the Jews, they were persecuted; and like the Jews, they had
a special covenant with God, which is to say that the Puritans believed they were given a special mission by God and that
they had a special or “exceptional” role to play in history. This 1630 speech by Winthrop – which was
actually just one part of his sermon, entitled “A Model of Christian Charity” – constituted the beginning
of what would emerge to create not only Christian Zionism but a general kind of ethos in America, and a general idea of
The next major “American” figure to mention
after Gov. John Winthrop is the Reverend John Cotton (1585-1652). Beginning in 1639 Cotton delivered a number of millenarian
and Judeocentric speeches which also tied in the idea that the people of the New England colonies were a special people
who possessed a special divinely ordained mission from God – that they were “Chosen,” just as the Old Testament
Israelites had been “Chosen.” This line of thought was developed further in the work of one of Cotton’s
close friends and associates (who happened also to possess a rather strange first name): the Reverend Increase Mather (1639-1723).
In 1669 Mather published a book entitled The Mystery of Israel’s Salvation. In this work,
Mather insisted on a literalist interpretation of biblical prophecy and of the entire bible in general. A man of considerable
erudition, Increase Mather was definitely aware of the anti-literalist (preterist) trends which were gaining ground in England
(trends with which he strongly disagreed), and so he committed himself to defending biblical literalism against all other
tendencies. Mather strongly believed that if one does not interpret the bible literally – if people allow themselves
to get caught up in metaphor and allegory – then eventually the concept of religious faith will lose its entire meaning.
Mather also repeated in his work many of the same themes of his Christian Zionist predecessors, going all the way back to
Calvin and Luther. Themes such as: Jewish national conversion paving the way for the return of Christ, the destruction of
the Catholic Church, the return of the Jews to Palestine and the concomitant destruction of Islam which would accompany
the return, etc.
Meanwhile, back in England, there was not only a growing sense
of anti-literalism taking root, but there was also a growing indifference to the overall destiny (spiritual or otherwise)
of the New England colonists themselves. For example, in 1634 the well-read English bible scholar Joseph Mead (1586-1639),
when asked for his opinion of the New England colonists, essentially said that he wished the colonists well but he did not
think that the colonies – or more specifically, North America – had any importance in an eschatological sense.
Mead even went as far as to say that he believed America was the land to which Satan and his armies had fled at some point
in the remote past, because Christ’s message (which had been spread throughout the rest of the known world) had not
been received by the indigenous peoples prior to the arrival of the Europeans. So according to Mead’s embarrassingly
simple logic, Satan had retreated into the vast American wilderness in order to prevent the Indians from coming to Christ
– and this would then explain the fact that the Indians had no clue as to who Christ was or what Christianity was
Here, one should understand that at this time in history, when Mead
made his judgment on North America, there already existed widespread speculation among Christian settlers as to the biblical
origins of American Indians – because at this time, it was still believed by most Christians that the origin of every
race, tribe and people on earth could be found in the pages of the Book of Genesis. The “discovery” of indigenous
non-White peoples in the New World presented the Christian theologians with a great conundrum. It was not enough to simply
state that the indigenous peoples had always lived in North America; a formal explanation would be required. So, many began
to assume that the Indians might have been the descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. However, speculation about
this eventually died out after countless attempts to convert the Indians had completely failed. In time, Joseph Mead’s
negative view of North America and its indigenous population eventually found a significant base of support in England. Some
people began to believe that the New World was in fact Satan’s den and that the Indians were nothing more than reincarnated
“Canaanite” heathens, i.e. savage, idol-worshipping pawns of Satan.
was only after Joseph Mead had been dead for more than half a century that a few New England colonists began responding (in
the 1690s) to what he had said about America all those decades before. One of the New England respondents was Judge Samuel
Sewall (1652-1730). Essentially Sewall stated in his response that he not only disagreed with the late Joseph Mead’s
view that America would have no place in the Millennium (i.e. millennial reign of Christ), but Sewall went so far as to say
that America would host the actual physical location of the future New Jerusalem. Accompanying this assertion was
an unmistakable expression of colonial patriotism, as Sewall was unquestionably offended by Mead’s statements. Another
New England respondent was the famous colonial preacher and polymath Cotton Mather (1663-1728) – the son of Increase
Mather and grandson of John Cotton. In his response to Mead, Cotton Mather did not exhibit as much patriotism as Sewall.
For example, he did not dare espouse the unorthodox view that the future seat of Christ’s Kingdom on earth would be
located in America. Nevertheless, Mather did state that it was unreasonable to believe that, upon Christ’s return,
America would have no role to play in the coming Millennium.
in these responses one could clearly detect an emerging, nascent American nationalism mixing with the older Puritan tradition
of Judeocentric prophecy interpretation. Indeed, both American patriotism and Judeocentrism coalesced to create an unmistakable
civic religion in what would become the United States.
of Cotton Mather should be discussed here a bit further because, in all honesty, he was quite an interesting historical figure
and one who is perhaps underestimated in his contribution to helping form American identity. As a prolific author and confirmed
polymath, Cotton Mather was interested and knowledgeable in a wide variety of subjects, and one of these subjects was Islam.
He was very interested in Islamic culture, history, the Ottoman Empire, etc. It should be said that at this time in colonial
history it was very popular to read the narratives of those who had been abducted and taken captive by the various American
Indian tribes. Thus in a similar fashion (due to his great knowledge of Muslim cultures), Mather produced a number of popular
stories on the experiences of Anglo-American sailors who had been taken captive by the infamous Barbary pirates.
Consequently, Cotton Mather’s writing contributed quite significantly to the formation of early American
nationalism. For example, he would write about the various trials and degradations suffered by the American captives, and
of the great need for them to persevere and hold on to their Christian faith. So these stories served to confirm and consolidate
American national identity, and to foster an already growing sense of patriotism in the colonies.
As Cotton Mather grew older he became more acquainted with the non-literalist trends and hermeneutics back
in England. And he saw that many people had been routinely disappointed with the literalist interpretations of various ministers
– which is to say, many had become disappointed with those ministers who, based on their own literal interpretations
of biblical text, had predicted that the Millennium would arrive on such and such a date. For example, some pastors predicted
the Millennium would come in 1697, others said it would come in 1716, etc. Needless to say they were all proven wrong. At
that point, after seeing the late 17th and early 18th century “great disappointments”
among the religious masses, Cotton Mather began to question whether a purely literal approach to interpreting biblical prophecy
was correct. Thus, Mather tried to establish something of a hybrid approach. Toward the end of his life, however, he became
a convinced pre-millennialist like Joseph Mead, which is to say that Mather no longer believed the Jews had to be converted
as a precondition prior to Christ’s return, and that the only thing preventing the events of the Apocalypse from being
set in motion is the Will of God. In other words, Christ could return at any moment and there are no essential preconditions
for the Second Coming.
In any event, by the mid-eighteenth century, after more than
a century of Judeocentric indoctrination and pulpit-based propaganda, the English colonists of North America (and especially
those in New England) began to see themselves as Jews, which is to say they began to strongly identify themselves
as a Second Israel. This belief comes out especially strong in the years leading up to the American War of Independence
– to form what the historian Nathan Hatch refers to as civil millenarianism. What Hatch means by the
term “civil millenarianism” is that the idea of civic or patriotic duty and political involvement eventually
coalesced with millenarian prophecy to create a civic belief system in which one’s political and national identity
combines with one’s religious beliefs. And indeed, this was a phenomenon which was occurring to an enormous extent
throughout New England and, by extension, throughout all of the other colonies as well – because, compared to all of
the other colonies, New England dominated in terms of intellectual influence. So it is important for the reader to comprehend
that practically all of these early “American” ideas and works have their origins in the long-deceased minds
of New England’s foremost religious zealots.
And so, as we pass into the second
half of the eighteenth century, when the British government intensified its perceived “tyranny” against the
considerably free and prosperous colonials (via the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, etc.), the long-established tradition of Judeocentric
prophecy interpretation (as well as the age-old belief in the “Turco-Catholic” Antichrist) was easily combined
with American civil millenarianism in such a way as to portray the British government – and the embodiment of that
government, King George III – as being the Antichrist or Satan incarnate. Naturally then, the eventual war against
Britain came to be seen by many of those descended from Puritan stock as a grand cosmic, apocalyptic struggle between the
forces of Good and Evil.
Of course many traditional American historians like to
emphasize the mainstream view that the founders of the United States were great admirers and followers of the ideas of John
Locke, and that they all categorically believed in “libertarian” type principles which include religious tolerance
among other “enlightened” views such as freedom of speech, civil rights, limited government, property rights,
etc. However, this mainstream view is not at all accurate. The truth of the matter is that the influence of millenarian
Puritanism (aka Judeocentrism aka Christian Zionism) on the ideological foundations of the United States is grossly understated
and underrepresented in the historiography of the American experience. This is a tradition which fundamentally denies
religious tolerance, denies minority rights and denies freedom of expression. And this is the tradition
upon which the United States was fundamentally founded.
Indeed it was civil millenarianism,
specifically, which was the driving ideological engine behind the so-called American “Revolution” (i.e. War
of Independence). Then, upon independence, the civil millenarian idea became embedded in the American national identity and
consciousness. In other words, it became a part of what it means to be “American.” Thus, more and more Americans,
post-independence, came to view themselves as the New Israel, the New Chosen People, the holders of another covenant with
God, the Redeemer Nation, the last bastion of freedom on earth, etc., etc. The “snowball” began rolling downhill,
so to speak. Hence it takes no great effort for one to see how this kind of civil millenarian belief system led to the modern
civic religion of American Exceptionalism and the patently false and hypocritical view that America stands for “freedom
and democracy” around the world.
Roots of American Christian Zionism, Part 2
the nineteenth century there came into being two quintessentially American religious movements: Mormonism and Seventh Day
Adventism (aka Millerism). One of the things that really stands out about Mormonism, especially within the context of Judeocentric
prophecy interpretation, is that the first Mormons (Joseph Smith, Orson Hyde, et al.) strongly believed that there were
two “Chosen People”: the Jews and the Americans (or the “Second Israelites”). Likewise, according
to Mormonism’s founder and life-long freemason Joseph Smith (1805-1844), there are two Jerusalems as well: the original
biblical Jerusalem located in Palestine, and a New Jerusalem which would someday be established in North America. According
to Smith, each city would house one of God’s two Chosen Peoples; the Jews would receive the old Jerusalem and the
Americans would inherit the new. The Jews would be granted the earthly kingdom of God in Palestine, and the Christians (i.e.
Protestants, and more specifically Mormons) would inherit the spiritual kingdom. Thus it was with
the Mormons and their distinct brand of Protestant theology that there really began to evolve a well-articulated theological
division between Jews and Americans, in contradistinction to the prior millennialist division between
Jews and Christians.
As mentioned above, the other
quintessentially “American” religious movement is Seventh Day Adventism founded by William Miller (1782-1849).
Miller was someone who was incredibly interested in Judeocentric prophecy interpretation, and he actually “borrowed”
the work of a number of English writers – and even the calendar system of the Karaite Jews – in order to advance
his religious views and, specifically, to determine the precise date of the Second Coming which would then usher in the
millennial reign of Christ on earth. He especially incorporated many of the writings of the renowned “Father of Classical
Physics” Sir Isaac Newton, who himself expended a prodigious amount of intellectual energy into examining and interpreting
biblical prophecies so as to determine the exact date of the “end of the world.”
According to Miller, the return of Christ would occur sometime between March 21, 1843
and March 21, 1844 – sometime in that one year period between the spring equinoxes. When the cut-off date came and
went, as it inevitably did, Miller gave the excuse that he had made a mistake in his “calculations.” And so,
he recalculated and came up with a new date: October 22, 1844. Of course, that date came and went and nothing happened –
but it was really quite sad for his loyal followers, because, in preparation for the “big event,” they had sold
off all of their earthly possessions and properties to the point where they had become penniless. This naturally caused
Miller’s followers to go into a deep depression, which came to be known historically as the Great Disappointment.
In any event, it is important to note that the way in which William
Miller differs from nearly all other Protestant religious leaders is that he was not Judeocentric at all. Instead he was
a “supersessionist,” meaning he believed that the covenant which the Jews had once held with God was now held
by Christians, i.e. the true Christian Church. Therefore, according to supersessionist belief, God no longer owed the Jews
anything. As Miller himself once stated, “the Jew has had his day.” So again, Miller was not at all Judeocentric.
And because he held a more negative opinion about Jews, Miller was harshly criticized and even condemned by many of America’s
leading Protestant figures.
Now we come
to the person who is regarded as the father of Evangelicalism: John Nelson Darby (1800-1882). Originally, Darby was an Anglican
priest in Ireland who was staunchly against the Catholic Church and very interested in eschatology and prophecy interpretation.
Eventually Darby came to repudiate the Anglican Church of Ireland and all churches everywhere. Darby then began advising
his followers to cut themselves off from the world (or “worldly affairs”) – to neither participate in
politics nor church life, and to fully prepare themselves for the return of Christ. Like the Mormons, Darby drew a sharp
distinction between true Christians (i.e. Protestants), whom he collectively considered to be the “spiritual bride
of Christ,” and Jews who comprised the “earthly bride.” Darby promoted the idea that Jews would receive
an earthly inheritance (Israel) and Christians would be raptured up into heaven to be with Christ. All those who remained
on earth would have to suffer greatly under the Antichrist due to all of the chaos and destruction generated through him.
Of course the most famous idea in all of Darby’s work is this idea of the “rapture”
– a theological concept which is certainly very popular today among evangelicals in the United States. However, unlike
many of his contemporaries and predecessors, Darby did not believe that the Jews would have to be converted to Protestantism
in order to usher in the apocalypse. In other words, Darby was a convinced premillennialist; he believed that when the appointed
time came, Christ would simply return. Then, upon his return, Christ would rapture up the elect (the spiritual bride) and
they would disappear from the face of the earth. The Jews (the earthly bride) would then return to Palestine to exterminate
all the Muslims and thus inherit the Holy Land. Then the Antichrist would emerge to usher in the Tribulation – a time
of great terror and destruction, where all of the people remaining on earth would be greatly punished. According to Darby,
this punishment would be meted out by God to non-Christians in general, but more specifically to Jews for their responsibility,
as he saw it, for the crucifixion of Christ.
Thus Darby is
often described as an anti-supersessionist (unlike the Seventh Day Adventists) because he, in some sense, does
believe that the Jews are still the people of God. Even so, this is only a kind of ornamental anti-supersessionism, as Darby
still believed that Jews would have to suffer during the Tribulation (like everyone else who remained on earth) and that
only true Christians would escape the sheer horror of the apocalypse. It should further be known that Darby was actually
quite harsh in his remarks on Jews and, indeed, he taught his followers to have this same contemptible attitude toward them
(in striking contrast to modern-day Christian Zionists). In Darby’s view the Jewish people were nothing more than
elements in the fulfillment of biblical prophecy; Jews were not people in themselves but only chess pieces in the fulfillment
of a grand cosmic drama.
As already mentioned, John Nelson
Darby was strongly anti-political. He quite openly stated (referring to himself and his followers), “We do not mix
in politics; we are not of the world: we do not vote.” This is yet another way in which Darby’s evangelicals
differ from their modern politically mobilized counterparts in America. And speaking of America, Darby did visit the country
a number of times, and he had quite a lot of influence on various American preachers, especially one by the name of Dwight
L. Moody (1837-1899). It was essentially Moody that began spreading Darby’s doctrine throughout the United States –
a unique strain of biblical interpretation called “dispensationalism,” because both Darby and Moody believed
that the Word of God comes forth and is revealed to humanity in special installments or “dispensations.”
And although John Nelson Darby’s anti-political message did resonate to an extent
among some nineteenth century American evangelicals, ultimately it was a message that failed. This is because Americans have
a long tradition of civil millenarianism (of mixing their religion in politics), which is fundamentally rooted in the New
England Puritan idea that Americans are the New Chosen People and America is the New Israel. So, as one can discern from
a number of his comments on America, Darby was quite dismayed at what he observed among those Americans who claimed to follow
his ideas. It is important to point this out because, again, modern Christian Zionism is extremely political or
“worldly.” Darbyite theology, on the other hand, advocated for a complete withdrawal from the world, not only
from politics but from organized churches as well – and of course this latter position of Darby’s earned him
a great deal of contempt and criticism from many of his contemporaries.
Perhaps the most important historical figure who laid the groundwork for modern Christian Zionism, which is to say
the one person who was instrumental in adding a powerful political dimension to Christian Zionism, was William E. Blackstone
(1841-1935). Blackstone was a businessman who found success early in life. Sometime after making his fortune, Blackstone
decided to remove himself from the business world and dedicated himself to religious matters, specifically to Judeocentric
prophecy interpretation. Here, he believed (unlike Darby) in active political involvement with the explicit mission of assisting
Jews (yes Jews, not Christians) as much as possible. Blackstone published his first book on this subject in 1878
entitled Jesus Is Coming. In it he highlighted various “signs” which, he thought, conclusively demonstrated
that the end of the age was near. It is important to note that, at this time in world history, the publishing of Blackstone’s
work roughly coincided with the emergence of political Zionism among Jews in Europe.
As far as prophetic “signs” go, William Blackstone viewed Zionism as a sign which was
very encouraging, and he did everything he possibly could to assist the likes of Theodor Herzl and other influential members
of the World Zionist Congress. And indeed, Blackstone was a major friend to the Zionists. So much so that from the late nineteenth
century into the early twentieth, Blackstone would write to one U.S. president after another, petitioning them to bring
as many eastern European Jews into the country as possible and to assist in helping Zionist leaders create a Jewish state
in Palestine. This was largely due to the news stories Blackstone read of the various anti-Jewish pogroms which were allegedly
occurring in Russia at the time. And so, Blackstone wrote first to President Harrison on this issue, advocating for millions
of eastern European Jews to come to America. Needless to say, his appeals were not successful immediately. But Blackstone
was a dogged political activist. He would continue writing to other presidents and politicians on the Jewish issue and was
especially successful in getting through to Woodrow Wilson. His letters to President Wilson were quite interesting because
he would repeatedly drive home the point that if Wilson would assist the Jews and the Zionist effort to establish a Jewish
state in Palestine, then Wilson would himself go down in history as one of the greatest world leaders of all time, along
the lines of Cyrus the Great. It is very well known to historians that over the course of his political career Wilson had
developed a deep-seated messiah complex, so Blackstone’s “tact” in dealing with Wilson (i.e. in comparing
him to one of history’s great kings) was very shrewd indeed, and it yielded great results.
It should be mentioned that there is quite a bit of irony in William Blackstone’s
career as a political activist, because despite the fact that he was someone who wanted to evict millions of Arabs from their
ancestral lands in the Middle East, and despite the fact that he is considered a “founding father” of extreme
right-wing Christian Zionism, Blackstone really was a progressive/left-wing “social gospel” Christian.
For example, one of the institutions he was responsible for helping to establish was the International Court of Justice.
And without question this is one of many “humanitarian” world bodies which today’s Christian Zionists
regularly deride due to the fact that the ICJ happens also to condemn Israel on a regular basis. So it is certainly ironic
that this man (Blackstone), whom Christian Zionists can trace their philosophical lineage to, was a strong supporter of the
International Court of Justice.
When, during the early years
of the twentieth century, the United States was witnessing the political formation of the burgeoning Jewish state via the
Balfour Declaration of 1917, there again sprouted a distinct millenarian ethos. Evangelical leaders became more and more
vocal in their support for the Jewish people to conquer Palestine and to dispossess and even exterminate all Muslims
because, they maintained, the Jews are God’s “Chosen People.” Comparisons were easily made (as more and
more Jewish “settlers” immigrated to Palestine) between what the Jews were doing to the Arabs and what the American
settlers had already done to North America’s indigenous population. This is to say that there was a conscious effort
– among religious, cultural and political elites – to associate the ongoing Jewish conquest of Palestine with
the “heroic” idea of American Manifest Destiny. The utter extermination of Palestinians was viewed in a positive
light, not only by Christian Zionist leaders but by major American media outlets as well. Americans and Jews were portrayed
as having come together, as God’s People, in order to carry out their God-given mission to expand Judeo-Christian
civilization as far afield as possible.
must also understand that as Zionism was gaining influence politically, during the late nineteenth century, the imperialist
mentality was also emerging in America. The cataclysmic War Between the States (1861-1865), in which nearly 1 million Americans
lost their lives, was still a recent memory for most, and the vast majority wanted to somehow forget all the many pains
which were caused by that especially cruel internecine war. Both Northerners and Southerners desperately craved some semblance
of patriotic unity. The Spanish-American War would provide such a display of patriotism and national unity.
The 20 year period between the Spanish-American War
(1898) and the end of World War I (1918) witnessed a profound resurgence of American patriotism which galvanized the nation
like never before. It just so happens that these two pivotal decades also witnessed the influx of millions of Jewish immigrants
(the largest influx of Jews in American history). In addition, the Federal Reserve System was also established during this
era (via the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913), and for the first time in history Jewish political and economic
power really began to consolidate itself in North America. So, all of these factors began to coalesce. It is by no means
accidental that the Puritanical belief that Americans are God’s Chosen People was then projected on to the Zionists.
Indeed, more and more Americans came to consider the Jews as a special kindred people – as being like themselves.
It is therefore easy to see how it is an integral part of American culture to be pro-Jewish – this has been true, historically,
since the earliest days of colonial settlement, long before the official establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. Today,
it is even highly doubtful whether a genuine American identity could exist without there being a firm pro-Jewish ethos in
place, despite what the ever-dwindling numbers of paleoconservatives have to say. It all goes back to the civil millenarian
tradition which arose out of a Puritanical religious source in the 17th century and then mixed with a late 19th
century imperialist worldview.
fanatical support for Israel among evangelicals (aka Christian Zionists) in the United States. The evangelical belief in
the rapture and Judeocentric prophecy interpretation, in addition to the central role which the Jews and the state of Israel
play in the evangelicals’ overall belief system – all these fundamental pillars of the Christian Zionist worldview
translate to mean that evangelicals (and Christian Zionists in general) have to support Israel and the Jewish lobby
in America. It is quite literally a part of their religion – and I dare say the number one tenet of their entire Weltanschauung
– to be pro-Israel. Their support for Israel is so important, in fact, that if Israel ever ceased to exist, their religion
would be proven wrong. So the evangelicals/Christian Zionists must do whatever they can to support Israel in any way possible.
Now, in addition to the Christian Zionists, there is
one other group of people that one can definitely say is an inheritor of the pro-Jewish/pro-Israel tradition – and
that group is the neoconservative faction. If neocons are not modern-day millenarians, then I (the author) don’t know
who is! Just take a look at Francis Fukuyama’s book, The End of History (1992). In this (his most famous)
work, Fukuyama states that, with the fall of the Soviet Union, liberal democracy has essentially triumphed over all other
political systems worldwide. And like many other neocons, Fukuyama believes that America has the right and the moral duty
to go forth and spread its special brand of “freedom and democracy” throughout the world. So again, one sees
this Puritanical idea of America being a Second Israel favored by God – the same great “bastion of freedom”
which the Puritans believed in from the time of their initial landing at Plymouth Rock all the way to the Revolutionary
era. And of course this ties into the millenarian aspect as well – the idea of the democratic millennium, that democracy
has conquered the world and dictatorship is gone forever. If Fukuyama’s book is not an overtly millenarian work, then
(again, in the author’s opinion) nothing is! Then there are groups of neocons like the one which rabidly pushed for
the Iraq War – the Project for the New American Century. I have a feeling that the only reason they did not call themselves
the “Project for a New American Millennium” was because that title would sound too grandiose, and perhaps also
blow their cover!
What is ironic about neoconservative historians
is that they tend to downplay the effect of religion on American culture and on the founding of the United States. They
claim that the founders were all secularists and that the religious nationalism of the Puritans was not an influential force
in the country’s founding. This premise is of course 100 percent wrong. Nevertheless, the neocons are definitely a
group which has inherited the millenarian tradition, and this fact explains quite well why neocons tend to agree on so many
points with Christian evangelicals, especially with regard to their shared support for the state of Israel and the American
Indeed, the pro-Israel lobby in the United States
is very influential, however were it not for the long tradition of forming American identity around Judeocentric and millenarian
lines, it is highly dubious to suggest that the Israel lobby would have any power in the United States whatsoever. As already
mentioned, it is simply a part of American culture to be pro-Jewish. This fact is what ultimately empowers
the Israel lobby and it is the ultimate source of American support for the state of Israel, despite the fact that Israel
offers no strategic benefit to the U.S. government, and despite the fact that Israel does not share any alleged “democratic
values” with the United States or the broader West.
his book Knowing Too Much (2012), American Jewish scholar Norman Finkelstein predicts that American support for
Israel will eventually end as the knowledge of Israel’s atrocities spreads throughout the news media and as American
Jews learn more and more about the true nature of Israeli aggression (given how cerebral and literate they tend to be).
American Jews will therefore come to the conclusion that supporting Israel conflicts with their own predominantly liberal
beliefs. And so, over time, as this tension becomes stronger and stronger, American Jews will cease supporting Israel as
fervently as they once had, and this will lead to the eventual end of American support for Israel in general. This is Finkelstein’s
claim, and it is ultimately flawed. Because, make no mistake: American support for Israel will not end.
Even if American Jews stop supporting Israel tomorrow, there are still
many tens of millions of evangelicals supporting the Jewish state. There is still an entire cultural context of pro-Jewishness
being a part of American identity and the belief (dating back to the time of the Puritans) that Americans are the New Israelites.
This deep-seated pro-Jewish ethos (ingrained in the psyche of tens of millions of Americans) is something that would be much
more difficult to uproot and eliminate than the pro-Israel views of the American Jewish minority (who are themselves split
on the issue).
If we consider the evangelicals,
support for Israel is the central tenet of their religion – it is not Jesus or God or the Holy Spirit, and it is certainly
not any of the teachings of Jesus’s Sermon on the Mount. Support for Israel is the most fundamental idea behind evangelical
Christianity or what could also be called Christian Zionism. And evangelicals will continue their support for Israel no matter
what heinous atrocities that that illegal terrorist state continues to perpetrate against the indigenous non-Jewish peoples
of the region. Evangelicals and Christian Zionists in general simply do not care. They evaluate the righteousness or unrighteousness
of someone by the degree to which that person supports Israel. That kind of fanatical support is not going to vanish any
time soon. So this problem is much more serious than Finkelstein realizes.
no mistake about it: the Zionist problem does not ultimately stem from American Jewish support for Israel. Rather, it is
entirely rooted in the pro-Jewish culture, history, politics, identity and religious traditions of Gentile Americans
– a religious, cultural, political and national bloc which constitutes the primary support for Israel’s dastardly
deeds, and without which the Zionist state of Israel would have never come into being.
Click on this text to see Brother Nathanael Exposing Zionist Christians...
Click on this text to see How Christians were Hoodwinked by the Scofield Bible...
What it means to be
It means you’ve lost your freedom
you think mass murder is OK
Americans are the hired hitmen of the Jews, destabilizing
all societies and then feasting on the carcasses, like true vampires.
is a new secret police in America and it is Jewish. This police force doesn’t fight crimes, it commits them.
The truth and the law no longer coincide.
By John Kaminski
main obstacle in dealing with most of my fellow Americans is how absent of moral compass they have become. Their actions
have shrunk to the size of their intellects. They genuflect toward goodness, but overlook the blood constantly spilled in
their names. To them, honesty has become a naive anachronism; profitable ways to circumvent the law are now admired.
How lost people are, how absolutely certain of their own ignorance, how they lie to themselves. As long as their addictions
and compulsions are sated, they are stunningly willing to fight to the death for ideas they do not thoroughly comprehend.
For instance, the United States surrounds Russia today with
tanks, troops and missiles, yet the only topic found in Western media is what a profound threat Russia is to the United
States. It’s a classic war-is-peace trick, and the world suffers mightily for it. The U.S. military budget is ten
times Russia’s. Sen. John “Insane” McCain was not happy until President Donald Trump fired missiles into
Syria for reasons that were totally bogus. How much more do you need to know? Apparently, a lot more.
Americans badly need to realize they have been consigned to the
wrong side of history, where all of their considerable triumphs have ended in a pockmarked landscape of abandoned businesses,
streetwalkers selling crack, and people shot in the back of the head because they developed health products that actually
worked. We have been set up for destruction by treasonous leaders who got rich by impoverishing our country.
In between taking bribes from billionaires and raping children,
our leaders remain securely in the pocket of a foreign power which makes them rich beyond their wildest dreams and the rest
of us broke beyond our worst nightmares.
are plucked of our money by bizarre schemes and programs that have nothing to do with the welfare of the people, the world
is plundered by charlatans who bet on disasters and then create them. Most of the people in the world are crushed, or at
least badly deformed, by this. Their cosmic destinies remain unfulfilled as they struggle for subsistence-level survival.
Americans are the hired hitmen of the Jews, destabilizing
all societies and then feasting on the carcasses, like true vampires. Criminalizing all thoughts that don’t ultimately
feed the beast, and murdering anyone who threatens their hateful hegemony.
Heck, they’re carving up the corpses of Syria and Iraq right now, terraforming them into military
bases and oil transport points, with tens of thousands dead in the process and the rest invading Europe. This process, including
the murder of Qaddafi, was a work of Jewish genius to destabilize all of Europe in one fell swoop.
I have always been amazed at how few people actually possess a
social conscience. And it has never been worse then now, when most people are trying to diagnose the ills of the world without
realizing their own attitude is the most relevant component of their task.
Relying on mainstream history guarantees you will not see the hidden hand behind the horror that
remains everpresent today in every law that says you are not permitted to think about certain subjects, nor should you express
If you believe in what’s
right, how can you tolerate two Rothschild candidates running for president, not just last time, but every time?
It’s like, throughout history, swindlers have won the
day every time and people have just gone along with it. So now we have bogus religion that doesn’t work except through
willful ignorance, and government that is obviously a robber’s free-for-all, and we still remain blockheaded about
why we are always invading some other country for reasons that are always false. Start with both World Wars and descend
into the pit of Hell from there.
I do know is so tragically horrible there’s no way to put a positive spin on it, when all of the elements of destruction
are massed on the horizon awaiting our next false move. It’s such a waste. Life could be so grand.
Specializing in horror and hate
If you’re pro-Israel you applaud the gratuitous murders
of Palestinian children, whose organs are then stolen and given to decrepit old Jews desperate to extend their warped lives.
From the middle 1940s on, Jews have decimated the local population in Palestine with a wanton genocide that continues to
this current moment. Pictures of what the Jews have done to this poor tribe (and the rest of the world) are straight out
visions of Hell, with crumbled houses, bleeding children and a world that has long since looked the other way.
Pro-Israel fans endorse poisoning wells, starvation and beheadings,
which are Jews’ favorite methods of eliminating those called goyim, a Hebrew word that means cattle. This
is why they have so many beheadings in Saudi Arabia, a member in good standing of those countries known as national killing
machines, or neocon nations (those fake conservatives who used to be Communists). Here is America we have all our food and
medicine poisoned by Jewish pharmaceutical giants and all our entertainment turned into suicidal psychodramas by Jewish
music producers that urge black people to rise up and kill whites.
If you are ‘pro-Israel’ you support all these things.
Lately the Jews have taken to incarcerating 80-year-old women for telling the truth about World
War II and lampooning the lies of the magic 6 million figure which Jewish media have made into a slogan central to their
new Holocaust religion — “We have suffered; you should pay us for that!”
In Germany especially but also in other European countries, the truth and the
law do not coincide. These EU countries have lost their freedom and people in them are not allowed to speak their minds in
any way that differs from what their government says about certain events of the past.
These restrictions always concern the Jewish history of the World Wars and
their fabricated death toll of the fabled 6 million that have enabled them to fleece billions out of innocent countries thanks
to strategically positioned Jewish judges and politicians. Hitler is the most hated man on the planet because of the false
stories Jews told about him. Yet in his own country, and among people around the world who understand what real freedom
is, Hitler was and is beloved as no U.S. president ever has been.
As you read this today, the negative feelings in your mind that you have about Hitler are all as a result of the
massive public relations campaign to denigrate his plan to escape from the clutches of the Jewish world bankers. It was
a war he would ultimately lose, and there went the last chance humanity had to escape from the Jewish world bank that is
now using its financial trickery to strangle the life out of the planet.
To be a Jew is a crime against humanity
There is a new secret police in America and it
is Jewish. This police force doesn’t fight crimes, it commits them.
Every politician in America owes his position to a Jewish financier, whose loans allow candidates
to prevail in manipulated elections.
correct functionaries determine which children will receive more complete educations. The rest are consigned to a pablum
exclusively designed for Deltas and Epsilons. This is how the Jews achieved dominance on a scholastic level, having Jewish
administrators ease their passage to the upper levels of non Jewish organizations.
To be a Jew is a crime against humanity. Jews have no integrity. They have only an instinctual urge
for vengeance which they are programmed to inflict on everyone else. Jews are immune to both logic and compassion, which
is why it makes no sense to ever argue with them. The bottom line is their only marker, which is why everything they touch
eventually sinks to the bottom, only they never suffer the losses, only their duped victims do.
They irradiated 100,000 of their own Sephardic children back in
the 1950s, presumably to maintain Ashkenazi supremacy within Israel. But that was only a single incident. <http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-ringworm-children.html>
Thanks to the multigenerational purveyor
of criminal sabotage Monsanto, we have a poison called Glyphosate sprayed on every piece of food in the supermarket which
assures serious diseases will seriously affect subsequent generations if the consumer is not killed outright.
The Jews are responsible for the murders of millions of people
throughout history, a fact that remains mostly unknown because these same Jews control virtually all of the world’s
I’ve seen the faces of Jewish soldiers
manhandling old Palestinian women. Worse is how the self-described Israeli defense forces shoot Arab children for sport
and joke about it. Even though they claim to be the only humans and everybody else to be farm animals, in this and so many
other matters, Jewish behavior is decidedly not human.
Bringers of darkness
Just remember you know nothing about what’s going on in the world, and you never will unless you become willing
to look at yourself and our situation much more seriously than you ever have. And as always, tomorrow
might be too late.
To be pro-Israel is to be
pro-genocide and profoundly deceitful about how you relate to the rest of the world. In the court of human opinion you’d
be declared insane by healthy people, who know that building your own fortune is the way to a healthy life whereas swindling
your way to happiness will ultimately make you sick.
Jews should never be allowed to hold positions of trust, because they will always be subverting
and sabotaging others in service to the dastardly schemes of their own tribe. You see it everywhere.
If you are pro-Israel, you can do anything
you want and get away with it. Especially if you are Jewish, you can commit any crime you choose and escape to Israel, where
no one can ever touch you.
As this hateful reality spreads through every country in the world, refusal to address this problem means the end
of freedom as we have known it. If you are pro-Israel, you like this idea.
All you pious Christians who think you can go to heaven while supporting a government that has become the hired
killer doing the dirty work of homicidal Jewish tyrants should be excluded from serious conversations about anything, for
it is your delusion that you could support Israel which has created this hell on Earth and still go to heaven when you die.
God knows there is no chance of that happening.
Registering Israel's Useful Idiots
FDD and AIPAC need adult supervision
Depending on what criteria one uses, there are between 200 and 600 groups in the United States that wholly
or in part are dedicated to furthering the interests of Israel. The organizations are both Jewish, like the Zionist Organization
of America, and Christian Zionist to include John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel, but the funding of the Israel
Lobby and both its political and media access comes overwhelmingly from Jewish supporters and advocates.
Many of the groups are registered with the Internal Revenue Service for tax purposes as 501(c)3 “educational”
or “charitable” foundations, which enables them to solicit tax exempt donations. One might dispute whether promoting
Israeli interests in the United States is actually educational, but as of right now the Department of the Treasury believes
it can be so construed, protected by the First Amendment.
But there is a more
serious consideration in terms of the actual relationships that many of the groups enjoy with the Israeli government. To
be sure, many of them boast on their promotional literature and websites about their relationships with the Benjamin Netanyahu
and his cabinet, so the issue of dual loyalty or, worse, acting as actual Israeli government agents must be considered.
There is a legal remedy to hostile foreigners acting against American interests and that
is the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA). Originally intended to identify and monitor agents of Nazi Germany
propagandizing in the United States, it has since been applied to individuals and groups linked to other nations. Most recently,
it was used against Russian news agencies RT America and Sputnik, which were forced to register. It is also being considered
for Qatar based al-Jazeera.
FARA requires identified agents to be transparent in terms of their funding and contacts while also being publicly identified as representing
the interests of a foreign nation. They must report to the Department of Justice every contact they have with congressmen
or other government officials. The text of the Act defines a foreign agent as
“any person who acts
as an agent, representative, employee, or servant, or any person who acts in any other capacity at the order, request, or
under the direction or control, of a foreign principal or of a person any of whose activities are directly or indirectly
supervised, directed, controlled, financed, or subsidized in whole or in major part by a foreign principal, and who directly
or through any other person— (i) engages within the United States in political activities for or in the interests
of such foreign principal; (ii) acts within the United States as a public relations counsel, publicity agent, information-service
employee or political consultant for or in the interests of such foreign principal; (iii) within the United States solicits,
collects, disburses, or dispenses contributions, loans, money, or other things of value for or in the interest of such foreign
principal; or (iv) within the United States represents the interests of such foreign principal before any agency or official
of the Government of the United States.”
In spite of language
that would presumably cover many of the hundreds of Jewish organizations acting for Israel, FARA has never been used to
compel registration of any such groups or individuals even when it was public knowledge that they were working closely with
the Israeli government to coordinate positions and promote other Israeli interests. That failure is at a minimum a tribute
to Jewish power in the United States, but it is also due to the fact that the organizations are funded from within the United
States by wealthy American Jews, not by Israel, which is the argument sometimes inaccurately made by the groups themselves to demonstrate that they are not being directed by the Israeli government.
difficulty in proving that one is directed by a foreign government has been definitively resolved regarding one group the
Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), which has become the leading neoconservative bastion seeking a war with
Iran, Israel’s bête noir. The recent al-Jazeera expose on the activities of the Israeli lobbies in both
Britain and the United States, which I wrote about last week, included a surreptitiously filmed conversation with Sima Vaknin-Gil, a former Israeli intelligence officer who now heads
the Ministry of Strategic Affairs, which is tasked with countering what is perceived to be anti-Israeli activity worldwide.
The Ministry is particularly focused on the non-violent Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS), which is increasingly
active in both the United States and Europe.
Vaknin-Gil was discussing
his activities with Tony Kleinfeld, an undercover investigative reporter who was secretly recording and filming his encounters
with various members of the Israel Lobby as well as of the Israeli government.Vaknin-Gil provided explicit confirmation that the FDD works directly with the Israeli government, making it an Israeli agent by the definition of FARA.
For those who are unfamiliar with FDD, it is probably currently the most prominent neocon
organization though it nevertheless claims to be a non-partisan “research group.” It focuses on foreign policy
and security issues by “Fighting Terrorism and Promoting Freedom,” as it informs us on its website masthead. It works to “defend free nations against their enemies,” which frequently means in practice anyone
whom Israel considers to be hostile, most particularly Iran. FDD’s Leadership Council has featured former CIA Director
James Woolsey, Senator Joe Lieberman, and Bill Kristol. Its Executive Director is Canadian import Mark Dubowitz, who is
obsessed with Iran. Its advisors and experts are mostly Jewish and most of its funding comes from Jewish oligarchs.
FDD’s auditorium has become a preferred venue for senior officials of the Trump Administration
to go and make hardline speeches, just as the American Enterprise Institute was under George W. Bush. Mike Pence, Mike Pompeo,
John Bolton and Nikki Haley have all spoken there recently, frequently focusing on Iran and the threat that it allegedly
FDD aside, Vaknin-Gil also confirmed that there were other groups in the United States doing the same sorts of things on behalf of Israel. He said “We
have FDD. We have others working on this,” elaborating that FDD is “working on” projects for Israel including
“data gathering, information analysis, working on activist organizations, money trail.”
So Vaknin-Gil was admitting that FDD and others were working as Israeli proxies, collecting information
on U.S. citizens, spying on legal organizations, and both planning and executing disinformation at Israeli direction. Kleinfeld
also spoke with a Jonathan Schanzer, a senior official in FDD, who filled in a bit more of what the foundation is up to
in terms of discrediting groups in the U.S. that support the BDS movement.
admitted “BDS has taken everybody by surprise” before complaining that the Jewish response has been “a
complete mess. I don’t think that anybody’s doing a good job. We’re not even doing a good job.” He
then complained that attempts to discredit Palestinian groups by linking them to terrorist groups had failed, as also had
the use of the label anti-Semitism. “Personally I think anti-Semitism as a smear is not what it used to be.”
So, when will the Justice Department move on FDD now that its true colors have been exposed
by al-Jazeera? The group must be required to register if justice be done, but will it? Its principal partner in crime the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has avoided registering for more than sixty years by claiming that it is
an American organization working to educate the U.S. public about the all the good things connected to Israel. Even though
it meets regularly with Israeli government officials, it claims not to be representing Israeli interests. But just as in
the case of FDD, it is time to require AIPAC to register as what it really is: a foreign agent. As a registered agent, it
will still be able to exercise First Amendment rights to defend Israel but it would not be able to be involved in lobbying
on Capitol Hill and directing money to politicians who are described as pro-Israeli, as it does now. Its finances will be
transparent and it will be perceived as an official advocate for Israel, not as an educational resource for what is happening
in the Middle East. Hopefully, when AIPAC stops throwing money around, the politicians and media types will find another
place to roost.
To be sure the lovefest for Israel in government extends
far beyond FDD and AIPAC. It can be found in many dark corners. National Security Advisor John Bolton recently received the “Defender of Israel” award from the Zionist Organization of America. And one might suggest that the U.S.
United Nations delegation, headed by Ambassador Nikki Haley, is directed by the Israeli government, particularly given events of last Friday whereby the U.S. voted against a motion condemning Israel’s continued illegal occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights,
thereby recognizing for the first time Israel’s sovereignty over the area. Whether Haley was speaking for herself
or for the administration was characteristically unclear, but it hardly matters. Nikki Haley might be referred to as a useful
idiot, as Lenin put it, but her consistent pattern of extreme loyalty in defense of Israel marks her out as being particularly
beholden to the Jewish state, which will no doubt arrange to richly reward her through some position in financial services
for which she is totally unqualified when she leaves her post in January. And then she will be well funded to run for president
in 2020. Having Haley in charge, one might just as well vote for Benjamin Netanyahu.
M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational
foundation that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is www.councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is email@example.com.
The following is a perfect example, that has been ommitted in history, of what JEWS and their
Commie minnions really think of Christians...
Communists Torture and Massacre Priests, Nuns, and Choir Boys in Marxist Upheavals in Spain
Josefina Sauleda Paulis, of the Dominican cloistered
monastery in Barcelona, has also been commended in Catholic sources.
After being captured and interrogated by the Jews and their commie acolytes, and when about
to be led away to be executed, she bravely and defiantly said: If you are going to kill me, why don’t you do it right
She was martyred and
her body was found outside the Hippodrome in Barcelona.
These two martyrs were listed among 731 other Christian martyrs of the Spanish Civil War, beatified by the Roman
Catholic Church in 2001 and 2007. In the beatification homily of Bonaventure Garcia Paredes and his companions, Pope Benedict
such a great number of martyrs to the list of beatified persons shows that the supreme witness of giving blood is not an
exception reserved only to some individuals, but a realistic possibility for all Christian people. It includes men and women
of different ages, vocations and social conditions, who pay with their lives in fidelity to Christ and his Church.
in his well-documented “Communist Atrocities in Spain”, tells of one murder squad which went to the Dominican
Convent in Barcelona and informed the Mother Superior that “because of possible mob violence” the nuns should
accompany the squad to a place of safety. They were then taken to the suburbs and murdered.
Their Jewish leader commented, “We needed the building. We didn’t
want to muss it up before we occupied it.”
E.M. Godden, in “Conflict in Spain,” says on p. 72, “During the last week of July, 1936, the bodies
of nuns were exhumed from their graves and propped up outside the walls of their convents. Obscene and offensive placards
were attached to their bodies.”
In Madrid, it was estimated that one tenth of the population of Spain was murdered by the Communist Jews by 1939.
De Fonteriz in “Red Terror in Madrid” tells how Cheka crews organized by Dimitrov and Rosenberg carried out
a program of torture and murder so obscene that it cannot be repeated or described.
To further their World Murder Plan, the Jews have occasionally allowed
a few of their numbers to be sacrificed. This was brought out at the meeting in Rothschild’s home in 1773, when it
was stated, “But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is
worth a thousand Goyim.”
the speaker meant was that if one Jew happens to be killed, he will be avenged by the death of one thousand Christians, or
“cattle” as the Christians are derisively referred to by the Jewish cult.
The speaker went on to point out to his rapt listeners that “We are
interested in just the opposite … in the diminution, the killing out of the Goyim.” The record of this meeting
in Rothschild’s house survived how?
Toll on the clergy
In the course of the Jews’ commie Red Terror, 6,832 members of the Catholic clergy, 20% percent of the nation’s
clergy, were killed. The figures break down the as follows: Some 283 women religious were killed. Some of them were badly
tortured. 13 bishops were killed from the dioceses of Siguenza Lleida, Cuenca, Barbastro, Segorbe, Jaén, Ciudad Real,
Almeria, Guadix, Barcelona, Teruel and the auxiliary of Tarragona. Aware of the dangers, they all decided to remain in their
cities. I cannot go, only here is my responsibility, whatever may happen, so said the Bishop of Cuenca.
In addition 4,172 diocesan priests, 2,364 monks and friars, among them
259 Claretians, 226 Franciscans, 204 Piarists, 176 Brothers of Mary, 165 Christian Brothers (also called the De La Salle
Brothers), 155 Augustinians, 132 Dominicans, and 114 Jesuits were killed. In some dioceses, the number of secular priests
killed are overwhelming:
Barbastro 123 of 140 priests were killed, about 88 percent of the secular clergy were murdered, 66 percent In Lleida, 270
of 410 priests were killed. about 62 percent In Tortosa, 44 percent of the secular priests were killed.
In Toledo 286 of 600 priests were killed. In the dioceses of Málaga,
Minorca and Segorbe, about half of the priests were killed”
In 2001 the Catholic Church beatified hundreds of Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War and beatified
498 more on October 28, 2007.
October 2008, the Spanish newspaper La Razon published an article on the number of people murdered for practicing Catholicism.”
May 1931: 100 church buildings are burned
while firefighters refuse to extinguish the flames.
1932: 3000 Jesuits expelled. Church buildings burned with impunity in 7 cities.
1934: 33 priests murdered in the Asturias Revolution.
1936: just a day before July 18, the day the war started, there already
have been 17 clergymen murdered.
July 18 to August 1: 861 clergymen murdered in 2 weeks.
August 1936: 2077 clergymen murdered, more than 70 a day. 10 of them bishops.
September 14: 3400 clergymen murdered during the first stages of the war.
1939: end of the war; a total of 7000 clergymen
and 3000 religious people murdered for practicing Catholicism.
More News You Won’t Hear Christians And Conservatives Talk About
By Chuck Baldwin
December 6, 2018
Continuing the theme of last week’s column, here is more news you won’t hear Christians and conservatives talk about.
First story: Over the past several days, we saw tremendous
courage from both the right and the left—and the cost of that courage.
I'm talking about both Senator Rand Paul and CNN analyst
Marc Lamont Hill. Both of these brave men had the courage to tell the truth about the Zionist State of Israel and, in the
case of Rand Paul, actually put serious action behind his words.
Senator Paul has blocked $38 billion in military aid
to Israel, and he is being pummeled for it. As you can imagine, powerful Zionist lobby groups such as AIPAC and Christians
United for Israel (CUI) are spending outlandish sums of money (CUI has already spent over $100 thousand on media advertising
across Kentucky) to exert pressure on Sen. Paul to withdraw his blockage.
The Trump White House and congressional Republicans
and Democrats are also exerting tremendous pressure on Dr. Paul to withdraw the blockage. How long Rand can withstand this
pressure is anybody's guess. As for Marc, you know what happened to him: CNN fired him.
Hill was fired after the Zionist attack-dog group,
the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), skewered him for his speech at the UN. The ADL said Hill was "anti-Semitic"
(the accusation they always make) and advocating violence against Israel. He wasn't. He was simply calling for Israel to
stop committing violence against Palestinians. Hill was clear. He said, "I support Palestinian freedom. I support Palestinian
self-determination." (So do I.) No matter. Without giving Hill an opportunity to defend himself, the network promptly
fired him. Now, the ADL is also demanding that Hill be fired from his teaching position at Temple University. One thing
Zionists deeply despise is the freedom of speech.
Everyone needs to read Joseph Margulies' take on Hill's firing. Margulies is an American Jew, by the way.
Once again, we see the power and influence that Zionism exerts over our national
news media and federal government. Israel is untouchable.
These two stories are just the tip of a very large iceberg. Maybe
more than anything else, the stranglehold that Zionism has on our government, media, entertainment industry and evangelical
churches is choking the life and liberty out of our nation.
And lest you think being anti-Zionist is being "anti-Semitic,"
IT'S NOT! (Nor am I. I love the Jewish people as much as I love the Palestinian people, or anyone else for that matter.)
a corrupt criminal cabal of international warmongers (comprising people from virtually all religions and races) who use politics,
economics and religion to enrich themselves off of global war. In fact, more than anyone else, Zionists are the ones who
are victimizing the Jewish people. And there are tens of thousands of Jewish people who reject Zionism and who do not support Israel’s persecution of Palestinians—and thousands of Jewish rabbis who are vehemently opposed to the Zionist government in Israel. (Research it for yourself, if you don't believe me.) America’s problem is, we have a Zionist government (or, at
the very least, a Zionist-manipulated government) in Washington, D.C., and we don’t even recognize it.
Second story: Donald Trump has replaced NAFTA with the United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which is nothing more than NAFTA on steroids. USMCA bludgeons national sovereignty and implements the globalist UN 2030 agenda.
Furthermore, USMCA gives tech giants in Silicon Valley the legal authority to censor anyone it wants to. Multiple reports are documenting the draconian threat to free speech that the USMCA poses.
Facebook, Twitter, Google, and YouTube all engaged in pre-election censorship
against Republicans and Trump supporters. Yet they’ve managed to sneak a liability protection into President Trump’s
trade bill that would make it even easier for them to censor their own users.
USMCA entrenches the tech giants’ legal protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency
Act, which grant them legal immunity for user-generated content. This is an important part of the law that allows tech platforms
to host a wide variety of speech with light-touch moderation.
But USMCA also entrenches
tech companies’ right to censor without liability. Article 19.17 of the trade agreement gives tech companies immunity from any lawsuits arising from actions taken to “restrict material it considers
to be harmful or objectionable.”
And Dr. Ron Paul condemns the USMCA for expanding government control over trade, increasing government protectionism, increasing the
cost of goods and decreasing employment. He also laments that USMCA forces unionism on Mexico, portends the potential nullification
of all right to work laws and increases inflation and government regulation. So much for Donald Trump’s commitment
to the First Amendment, freedom, less government and “America First” sovereignty.
Third story: Donald Trump’s foreign interventionism
is a repeat of the policies of Barack Obama and G.W. Bush, so says former Congressman Ron Paul:
Donald Trump campaigned with a promise to put ‘America first’ and to stay out of foreign conflicts.
As president, Trump has followed the same interventionist policies that failed his predecessors, says former Congressman
Rather than back out of the meeting, Paul wrote on Monday, Trump should have used the opportunity to declare that the US is not the “policeman of the world,”
and that “what flag flies over Crimea is none of our business.”
On the campaign trail, Trump had slammed President George W. Bush’s $1.9 trillion wars in Afghanistan
and Iraq, and promised to stay out of Syria. Since taking office, however, he signed off on multiple cruise missile strikes
against Syria, continues to arm anti-government rebels there –many of whom have links to Al-Qaeda–and continues
to hit all three countries with airstrikes, some of them deadly to civilians.
Fourth story: Israeli police officials are recommending bribery charges against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara.
In a bombshell announcement that could once again threaten the stability of the government, the Israel Police
announced on Sunday that it was recommending bribery charges against both Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife,
Sara Netanyahu, in the Bezeq corruption probe, known as Case 4000.
say that Benjamin Netanyahu advanced regulatory decisions benefiting Shaul Elovitch, the controlling shareholder in Bezeq,
the country’s largest telecommunications firm — despite opposition from the Communication Ministry’s career
officials — in exchange for positive coverage from Elovitch’s Walla news site.
In a blistering accusation, police said “the prime minister and his associates intervened in a blatant
and ongoing manner, and sometimes even daily, in the content published by the Walla News website, and also sought to influence
the appointment of senior officials (editors and reporters) via their contacts with Shaul and Iris Elovitch,” the Bezeq
“The main suspicion is that the prime minister
took bribes and acted in a conflict of interest by intervening and acting in regulatory decisions that favor Shaul Elovitch
and the Bezeq Group, while at the same time directly and indirectly demanded interference with the content of the Walla
site in a way that would benefit him,” police said in a joint statement with the Israel Securities Authority, which
also took part in the nine-month investigation.
Police said there was “improper
conduct between Netanyahu and Elovitch on two main axes: diverting media coverage in exchange for preferable regulation.”
Investigators said they believe there is enough evidence to bring Netanyahu to trial
on charges of accepting bribes, fraud and breach of trust and fraudulently accepting benefits.
I have tried to warn readers about the corruption and criminality of Netanyahu, but most Christians and conservatives ignore it, because, after all, Netanyahu is a Zionist, and Zionists are given
special elevated and protected status by Christians. But Netanyahu’s criminal activities finally seem to be catching
up to him. This could prove to be a bad omen for Donald Trump, who has his own closet full of criminality.
Fifth story: As soon
as the Democrats won the U.S. House, I predicted that Donald Trump would move leftward during the next two years in an effort
to appease Democrats. The day after the November elections, I wrote this on my Facebook page:
I think I should add one more prediction at this early stage following the Democrats winning the US House:
watch Trump move left during the next two years to accommodate House Donkeys. Trump has absolutely NO CENTER, NO CORE BELIEFS.
He will do whatever he needs to do to take care of Donald Trump. Watch as he even pressures Senate Republicans to compromise
and surrender to Democrats in the House. As I said in my post, Trump has MUCH to be concerned about as the House ramps up
their probes and investigations into his affairs. He has ten thousand skeletons in his closet that he doesn't want to be
discovered. Democrats KNOW he has MUCH to hide, and they will use it to coerce him to play ball with them. And Trump is
at his very best when he is making deals with the devil.
Well, it didn’t take long. Trump is already courting Democrats.
President Donald Trump, facing a Congress that will become dramatically more antagonistic toward him in January,
has begun courting Democrats who could determine whether his next two years are spent scoring legislative deals or staving
off an onslaught of congressional investigations.
In recent days, Trump has
invited the top Democratic congressional leaders to the White House amid a pressing government funding battle, and he privately
told a Democratic senator he would consider legislation to help stem the loss of auto manufacturing jobs in Ohio.
Trump's top aides have also been a regular presence on Capitol Hill, discussing legislative
goals even as Democrats begin plotting investigations into an administration they argue has escaped serious congressional
The overtures are a signal that Trump and his White House are at least
feeling out whether the self-professed dealmaker can find common ground with Democrats next year even as he faces pressure
from Republicans to keep the opposition party at arms [sic] length.
seen him when others advise not to make a deal and he moves ahead," said Marc Short, the former White House legislative
Sixth story: The vast majority of pastors, Christians and “conservatives”
are as ignorant of the principles of constitutionalism and Natural Law as are most liberals and unbelievers. That’s
why it normally doesn’t matter to a tinker’s dam which party controls Congress or whether a Republican or Democrat
is in the White House (including the current occupant). The political and religious right and left are operating in almost
total ignorance of the fundamental principles of liberty upon which America was built.
In my studies years ago, I sadly discovered that these
great American documents could not be found in one volume under one title. That’s why we created THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS.
is a giant compilation of America’s greatest historical documents in ONE volume: 212 full-size (8½ x 11) pages
containing 57 of our most important documents.
THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS are being shipped NOW. This is a special Christmas printing, and our supply will not last much longer.
A reader in
Post Falls, Idaho, wrote me and said, “I’m looking forward to sending THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS to each of
our seven children.”
A man in Austin, Texas, wrote me and said, “Thank you, Dr. Baldwin, for compiling this fantastic collection
of documents. I have purchased copies for our children, copies for our closest friends and copies for the children of our
closest friends. Again, thank you! Besides the Bible, this is the best book I have read in a long time.”
A man from
Massachusetts wrote me and said, “I have begun reading through my copy of THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS. I must admit, I was
somewhat skeptical of the price before purchase, but now that I am reading it, I understand what a bargain it is! Priceless!”
A man in Queensland,
Australia, wrote me and said, “You will be most happy to know that this morning THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS arrived. I went
into raptures. I cherish my FREEDOM DOCUMENTS. Thank you, Pastor Chuck, for getting it into one binding and making it possible
to hold such priceless documents for what is really a frugal price.”
And maybe this comment from Mansfield, Texas, said
it best: “THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS could save our country, if we can get enough people to order it.”
is a special Christmas printing, and our supply will not last much longer. To learn more or to order THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS,
THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS
© Chuck Baldwin
Still More News You Won’t Hear Christians And Conservatives
December 13, 2018
we are approaching the end of 2018, I am trying to do a little catch-up with all of the news we are not hearing talked about—especially
from Christians and conservatives. Sadly, the political right is as bad as the political left when it comes to honesty and
objectivity. And neither side seems to have a smidgen of knowledge of or commitment to the principles of Natural Law and
constitutionalism. As is usually the case, the most important news is the news we don’t hear.
story: Senator Rand Paul is voicing deep concern about Donald Trump’s appointment of William Barr as America’s
next Attorney General, and for good reason.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Sunday said he hasn't decided
whether to support President Donald Trump's pick to be the next attorney general because of concerns about privacy issues.
Speaking on NBC's "Meet the Press," Paul said he's concerned
that William Barr, who was attorney general from 1991 to 1993, "has been a big supporter of the PATRIOT Act, which
lowered the standard for spying on Americans, and he even went so far as to say the PATRIOT Act was pretty good — we
should go much further."
He also alleged that
Barr is a "big fan" of seizing people’s property through civil asset forfeiture.
"I haven't made a decision about him, but I can‘t tell you —
the first things I've learned about him being for more surveillance of Americans is very, very troubling," Paul said.
Barr, who served in the administration of President George H.W. Bush,
is Trump’s pick to replace Jeff Sessions.
Senator Paul is being very
generous in his remarks about William Barr. The truth is, Barr is a Deep State scoundrel of the highest (or lowest, depending
on how one uses the word) order. Veterans Today Editor Kevin Barrett speaks with much more candor.
Anybody who thinks Trump is out to drain the swamp and bust the Deep
State just got a dose of reality medicine, in the form of Trump’s nomination of swamp monster William Barr as our
next Attorney General.
According to former
Bush-CIA black ops specialist Chip Tatum, Barr was part of Operation 40, an Agency-linked criminal gang that moved huge quantities of drugs and was involved in many high-level political assassinations,
including those of the Kennedies, Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme, and dozens of others. Ironically, Trump—who tossed
a few rhetorical punches at the Bush Crime Family during the 2016 Republican primaries—has just nominated a man who
represented the Bush CIA drug cartel, both within the CIA itself (1973-1977) and later when he served as “Opium Poppy”
Bush’s Attorney General.
So why would Trump
fire Jeff Sessions and appoint a depraved denizen of the Deep State to replace him? Because Trump is the slimiest, scaliest
reptile from the deepest darkest part of the Deep State swamp. If you haven’t figured that out yet, you aren’t
I realize it’s hard for Christians and
conservatives to admit that Trump is a swamp creature; but the point about not paying attention is definitely germane. Christians
and conservatives aren’t paying attention, especially to all things Deep State, Warfare State, Police State, Zionist
State or New World Order. To the vast majority of Christians and conservatives, these realities do not exist. Donald Trump
can appoint all of the Deep State swamp creatures he wants (i.e., John Bolton, Elaine Chao, Nikki Haley, Gina Haspel, James
Mattis, H.R. McMaster, Steve Mnuchin, Mike Pompeo, Jerome Powell, Wilbur Ross and a cast of hundreds), and Christians and
conservatives will continue to hail the man as “the greatest President ever.”
Second story: After Saudi
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) ordered the brutal torture-killing of American resident and Saudi citizen, journalist
Jamal Khashoggi, Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser (and Deep State globalist) Jared Kushner actually coached MBS on “how to weather the storm” (the storm of MBS being caught murdering Khashoggi).
The President's son-in-law
and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, continued to have private conversations with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman following
the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, according to The New York Times.
Kushner offered the de facto Saudi ruler advice "about
how to weather the storm" following the death of Khashoggi, the Times reported on Saturday, citing a Saudi source familiar
with the conversations.
Although White House
protocol stipulated that National Security Council staff be present on all phone calls with foreign leaders, Kushner and
bin Salman continued to chat informally after Khashoggi's death, the Times reported, citing two former senior American officials
and two people briefed by the Saudis.
Third story: Senate Republicans are so convinced that MBS murdered Jamal Khashoggi that they are seriously considering withdrawing U.S.
support for Saudi Arabia’s war crimes against Yemen.
The United States has been helping Saudi Arabia bomb and starve the Middle
East’s poorest country for about three years now. One recent estimate suggests that 85,000 children under 5 years old have already died from malnutrition as a result of Riyadh’s intervention in Yemen’s
civil war. If the Saudis’ air strikes and blockade continue, Yemen is poised to face the worst famine that humanity has seen in 100 years, according to the U.N.
Eight months ago, the
fact that Saudi Arabia was routinely dropping American-made bombs on Yemeni school buses and hospitals — and in the process of deliberately starving tens of thousands of children to death — was not enough
to persuade the Senate that the United States should cease supporting the Saudi campaign. Back then, the upper chamber declined to even allow extended debate on a bill that would have ended such support.
then, Saudi agents murdered and dismembered a U.S. resident who wrote for the Washington Post, and had personal relationships with influential people
in our nation’s capital. And, for whatever reason, this convinced a critical mass of U.S. senators that not supporting
war crimes in Yemen was, at least, an idea worth considering.
In a last-ditch effort to change their minds, the
Trump administration sent Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary James Mattis to the Senate last week, to
brief all 100 lawmakers on the case for maintaining U.S. support for the Saudi war in Yemen. But many senators were less
concerned about the pros and cons of abetting war crimes than they were with whether Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman
(a.k.a. MBS) had ordered the murder of Jamal Khashoggi (the Washington Post columnist who knew
some people whom they also knew). They specifically wanted to hear from CIA director Gina Haspel on that subject, since her
intelligence agency had been strongly suggesting that it had proof of the crown prince’s guilt, even as the Trump
administration insisted that no such proof existed. But Haspel did not attend the hearing — and Pompeo and Mattis
would only reiterate the White House’s position that the U.S. possessed no “direct” evidence that MBS was
involved in the killing.
According to ABC News, several senators were so furious about Haspel’s absence, and “unhappy with the administration’s lack
of answers and unwavering support for the Saudis despite the murder of Khashoggi,” they decided to green-light debate
on withdrawing U.S. support for starving Yemeni children, so as to send a message to the administration about the need for
more information about Khashoggi’s death.
Of course, what should be
obvious is the fact that both President Trump and the U.S. Congress are much more concerned about keeping Saudi money pouring into the coffers of America’s politicians, especially Trump's (Trump’s business dealings with the Saudi kingdom are at the top of the heap—as in dung heap), than they
are owning up to the fact they are all complicit in mass murder and crimes against humanity. And Trump’s staunch defense of Saudi Arabia is downright pathetic. Anyone who claims to believe in even rudimentary moral law must be sick to their stomach at the way Donald Trump is covering
for, pandering to and partnering with the murderous, monstrous House of Saud.
story: FOX News channel host Tucker Carlson had the guts to go on national television and admit that Donald Trump is not capable and that he doesn’t keep
Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson set straight any misinformation
concerning his views on President Trump: “I don’t think he’s capable,” he said during an interview on Tuesday.
Urs Gehriger, an editor at “Die
Weltwoche,” Switzerland’s leading German-language opinion weekly, noted that Carlson’s new book, “Ship
of Fools,” is silent on Trump but comments on his critics. And so, Gehriger jump-started the conversation by asking
what Carlson thought of Trump’s first two years in office.
Carlson said he cannot stand Trump’s self-aggrandizement and boasting. [Where are America’s evangelical
pastors on this subject?] Then, when asked whether Trump has kept his promises, the usually quick-witted and long-winded
Carlson had just one word: “No.”
chief promises were that he would build the wall, defund Planned Parenthood and repeal Obamacare, and he hasn’t done
any of those things,” Carlson said, adding that those goals were probably lost causes. Trump, he said, doesn’t
understand the system, and his own agencies don’t support him.
“He [Trump] knows very little about the legislative process, hasn’t learned anything, hasn’t
surrounded himself with people that can get it done, hasn’t done all the things you need to do, so it’s mostly
his fault that he hasn’t achieved those things,” he added.
to Tucker Carlson. Truth and objectivity about Donald Trump on FOX News is almost impossible to find.
Fifth story: Despite what conservatives are saying about a robust U.S. economy, a market crash is already underway. Writing for Forbes, here is Clem Chambers:
That’s it – as far
as I’m concerned a crash is underway. Earlier today I wrote that my funky little U.K. indicator said another move down was due and we are in for a bad time.
Well, here it is, another move down and a big one, at least it is as I write
this, so as far as I’m concerned we are over the lip of ravine and in free fall.
So the key question now is how far can it fall?
In my mind from top to bottom of a crash on the Dow is somewhere between 25%-30%.
That would mean a normal Dow crash would bring us down to around 20,000.
The Nasdaq is a different kettle of fish and quite able to drop 40%-75% and the higher the Nasdaq has flown
the further it can fall.
So until further notice
my position is that the crash in now underway.
I’m 75% cash and I’m likely to reluctantly liquidate the rest over the coming days.
Even if it were to bounce, this is a market that wants to crash and if it’s
not doing so right now, that crash is unlikely to be far off.
luck to everyone, I’d like to be wrong.
And I have tried to tell people for years about the wisdom of transferring stocks-based IRAs to precious metals-based IRAs.
Sixth story: At a recent White House Hanukkah party, President Trump insinuated that American Jews have a dual loyalty to Israel.
US President Donald Trump told American Jews that his vice president
had great affection for “your country,” insinuating a dual loyalty to Israel.
“I want to thank Vice President Mike Pence,” Trump said Thursday
at one of two White House Hanukkah parties. “A tremendous supporter — a tremendous supporter of yours. And Karen.
And they go there and they love your country. They love your country. And they love this country. That’s a good combination,
One can only imagine what Christians and conservatives
would have done had any President other than Trump told a group of American Muslims (or American Hindus, Shintoists, etc.)
that Iran or Syria (or India or Japan, etc.) was “your country.” But, of course, Israel is different. Christians
believe that the Zionist State of Israel is a resurrected biblical Israel and that Benjamin Netanyahu and his gaggle of global
criminals are “God’s Chosen People.” But it’s not, and they aren’t! Oh, yes, we cannot forget
that Zionist billionaire (and huge Republican contributor) Sheldon Adelson was also in the room.
doubt that evangelical Christians will ever awaken to how Zionist Israel funds both sides of the political aisle in America
in order to secure support for the Zionist state no matter which side wins. Zionists such as Sheldon Adelson fund the GOP,
and Zionists such as George Soros fund the Democrats—and Christians, for the life of them, cannot seem to figure that
Seventh story: Trump’s appointee to the Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh—the
man who is supposed to bring an end to abortion-on-demand and overturn Roe v Wade—rendered his first abortion-related
vote as a Supreme Court justice—and he sided with pro-abort liberals, saying that states do not have a
constitutional right to defund Planned Parenthood. Writing for the Washington Examiner Magazine, Philip Klein reports:
In an early decision involving abortion, newly confirmed Supreme
Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with liberals in declining to hear a case that could have allowed states to defund
Planned Parenthood in state Medicaid programs.
colleague Kimberly Leonard has more background and details of the cases, but the basic gist is that lower court rulings prevented Louisiana and Kansas from blocking abortion
provider Planned Parenthood from participating in Medicaid. The Supreme Court has now decided to pass on the cases.
Only four justices are needed to agree to grant a hearing on any case.
So to stop it from reaching the high court, it took Kavanaugh siding with Chief Justice John Roberts and liberal justices.
Three conservative justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and
Neil Gorsuch — all voted to hear the case.
I tried to warn my readers
and listeners about Kavanaugh. And to my surprise, so did Cliff Kincaid:
Citizen journalist David Risselada has written a book, Psychopolitics in America: A Nation Under Conquest, in which he explains how so many are being led astray by what passes for the “conservative media.” Consider
the case of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was sold by Fox News and other beltway groups as a conservative pro-lifer.
After Kavanaugh’s Monday ruling in favor of Planned Parenthood, many grassroots conservatives are beginning to realize
they were misled about his real record. One conservative website called it a “betrayal.”
It wasn’t a surprise to us. My group, America’s Survival, Inc.,
was virtually alone but not alone in exposing Kavanaugh’s real record on abortion and other social issues. We published
the 44-page report, “The Deep State Wears Black Robes,” and called his nomination a “Trojan Horse.” Yet, Fox News and other conservative media, as well as various
Washington, D.C.-based conservative groups, had advertised Kavanaugh as a strong conservative. Many of them were invited
to the White House to listen to Kavanaugh hail the legacy of “liberty” of the man he would replace, pro-abortion
and pro-gay Justice Anthony Kennedy. That turned out to be an indication of Kavanaugh’s liberal direction on the court.
We had conducted a careful study of Kavanaugh’s record, noting
that he was a virtual clone of Justice Kennedy. A liberal Catholic, Kavanaugh actually had a record of ruling against evangelical
chaplains. But one leading conservative told me I had gone off “the deep end” by opposing Kavanaugh. Fox News
refused to cover our detailed critique of his record. It was a very controlled “debate” with “both sides”
defined so as to exclude the real truth.
Fox News wasn’t alone in stacking the deck. All of the major conservative websites fell for the ruse that Kavanaugh
was a conservative. They know who they are. They owe their readers an apology.
Many Pastors And Christians Behaving More Like Herod Than Wise
Men And Shepherds
By Chuck Baldwin
December 20, 2018
Preachers and Christians in America talk a lot about
loving Jesus. They sing songs to Him; wave their hands in the air; pray to Him; and talk about His teachings. And at Christmas
time, they retell the story of Christ’s virgin birth, and boys and girls sing songs and put on plays—complete
with shepherds and Wise Men. But in reality, a huge number of preachers and Christians today behave more like King Herod
than they do the Christmas shepherds and Magi.
What was Herod’s conduct at the time of Christ’s birth? He ordered
the deaths of all of the children in Bethlehem, males and females, two years old and younger. Herod used his authority as
a governmental head of state to murder innocent children. So, how does this relate to today’s pastors and Christians?
I’ll tell you.
Last week, the U.S. House and Senate voted on resolutions to discontinue U.S. support for Saudi Arabia's
three-year war against Yemen. As many as 80,000 men, women and children have been slaughtered in this ongoing bloodbath, and 85,000 Yemeni children have starved to death. And the United States, under Presidents Obama and Trump, has supported Saudi Arabia’s barbarism with financial and
military aid. In fact, without America’s aid, Saudi Arabia would not have been able to perpetuate this genocidal war.
So, this is as much America’s war as it is Saudi Arabia’s.
The brutal, torturous assassination of permanent U.S.
resident, journalist Jamal Khashoggi, by Saudi assassins (under orders from the Saudi crown prince) somehow jolted the dead
conscience of the U.S. Congress, and both legislative branches voted on resolutions to discontinue America's participation
in the brutal Saudi war against Yemen.
Of course, Donald Trump and his ranking cabinet members lobbied Congress hard
to NOT cut off funding for this illegal war. (Tell me again how Trump is so much different than Obama.) The House voted to
CONTINUE participating in the war, but the Senate voted to DISCONTINUE participating in the war.
The vote in the House was 206 to 203 to keep America involved in the Saudi war on Yemen; the vote in the Senate was 56 to 41 to stop America's involvement in the Saudi war on Yemen.
And here's the rub: The vast majority of congressmen and senators
who voted to continue America's participation in the Saudi barbarism against Yemen were Republicans.
In the House,
201 Republicans voted for the war and only 18 Republicans voted against it. In the Senate, only 7 Republicans voted against
the war and all 41 senators who voted for the war were Republicans.
The 7 brave Republican senators who voted to stop America's
involvement in Saudi Arabia's war against Yemen were:
Collins (Maine); Daines (Montana); Flake (Arizona); Lee (Utah);
Moran (Kansas); Paul (Kentucky); and Young (Indiana).
Enthusiastic kudos to these senators!
This is another example
of how the "left-right," "liberal-conservative" and Democrat-Republican paradigm is so phony and misleading.
Whatever praise one wants to heap on the GOP, when it comes to expanding America's never-ending "war on terror,”
its limitless wars of aggression overseas and the overall Warfare State, Republicans are almost always the first ones to
shout their enthusiastic support. These votes in the House and Senate reflect that reality.
It also further proves
that Donald Trump is just another warmonger, no better than Barack Obama or G.W. Bush. These presidents (and the members
of Congress who support their wars) have the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocent victims dripping from their hands.
I'll say it straight out: Donald Trump is a murderer! Forget King Cyrus; King Herod is the one that Trump more resembles.
Again, only 18 Republicans in the House of Representatives voted against the illegal, brutal war in Yemen,
and only 7 Republicans in the Senate voted against it. Thankfully, those 7 Republican votes in the Senate were enough to
help carry the vote against the war; but in the House, the 18 Republican votes fell 2 votes short.
Here are the 18 House
Republicans who bravely voted against America's participation in Saudi Arabia's brutal war in Yemen:
Amash (Michigan); Biggs
(Arizona); Blum (Iowa); Brat (Virginia); Cloud (Texas); Gaetz (Florida); Garrett (Virginia); Gohmert (Texas); Gosar (Arizona);
Graves (Louisiana); Jordan (Ohio); Labrador (Idaho); Massie (Kentucky); Meadows (North Carolina); Perry (Pennsylvania); Posey
(Florida); Sanford (South Carolina); and Schweikert (Arizona).
I don't expect that this will have any impact on the
millions of Christians and conservatives who are caught up in blind (almost idolizing) support for Donald Trump and in the
phony left-right paradigm. But in case you are interested in truth, there it is.
Here is the down and dirty little secret: Christians
and conservatives are the ones promoting and sustaining America's Warfare State and perpetual war doctrine. The absence
of outrage from Christians and conservatives at the Republicans in the U.S. House and Senate and at President Trump for
supporting and voting to continue providing financial and military assistance for Saudi Arabia's barbaric war against Yemen
is an eternal indictment against these right-wing warmongers.
God hates murder and wars of aggression. But today's evangelical pulpits are filled with warmongers; today’s churches are filled with warmongers;
today’s Christian colleges and universities are filled with warmongers; and today’s GOP is filled with warmongers.
Satan is the
author of murder, and nothing or no one commits murder on the scale or magnitude of government. Therefore, government is
Satan's most effective tool at fulfilling his highest priority: murder. And, disgustingly, millions of evangelical pastors
and Christians are among the most enthusiastic supporters of the wicked, wretched warmongers (many if not most of them
Republicans) in Washington, D.C.
Next year, the new U.S. House could take another vote on withdrawing support from the
Yemen war, but if it passed (and it probably would under Democratic control), Trump will surely veto it, and pastors, Christians
and conservatives everywhere will enthusiastically support Trump's veto—and these illegal and immoral wars will keep
going on and on.
The fact that Republicans are right on some issues (and they are) does NOT give them the right to commit
murder in the name of the American people. Nor should conservatives—and especially Christians—support them when
Bottom line: If America's pastors, Christians and conservatives would stop supporting America's perpetual
war machinations, most of these immoral wars would cease forthwith.
So, as you are watching and listening to your pastor
homilize about the miraculous birth of the Lord Jesus Christ this Sunday, and as you enjoy the boys and girls in their costumes
singing Christmas hymns about “peace, good will toward men,” pause for a moment to see the cadaverous, starving
bodies of tens of thousands of little Yemeni children, see the charred bodies of innocent grandfathers and grandmothers who
have been burned to death from the fires caused by U.S.-made missiles and bombs, see the arms and legs flying through the
air from the dismembered bodies of Yemeni sons and daughters from U.S.-made jet bombers and attack helicopters that have
been raining down death and destruction upon a hapless, helpless civilian population via the brutal, bloodthirsty regime
of America’s “great ally” (Trump’s words), Saudi Arabia, for three long years.
And as you
are watching all of this death and destruction in your mind, remember that it is a majority of evangelical pastors and churches
(maybe even the pastor and church where you attend) who are among the biggest cheerleaders for these murderous, immoral,
unjust and unconstitutional wars of aggression all over the world. In other words, they are behaving more like Herod than
they are the Christmas Wise Men and shepherds.